Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M3 Max 14-Core vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

Apple M3 Max 14-Core

► remove from comparison Apple Apple M3 Max 14-Core

The Apple M3 Max 14 core CPU is a system on a chip (SoC) from Apple for notebooks that was introduced towards the end of 2023. It integrates a new 14-core CPU with 10 performance cores with up to 4.06 GHz and 4 efficiency cores with 2.8 GHz. There is also a more powerful 16-core variant with 40 GPU cores.

Thanks to the higher clock rates and architectural improvements, the processor performance is also significantly better than the M2 Max in benchmarks and can keep up with the fastest mobile CPUs.

The M3 also integrates a new graphics card with dynamic caching, mesh shading and ray tracing acceleration via hardware. In the cheaper model, 30 of the chip's 40 cores are used and support up to 5 displays simultaneously (internal and 4 external).

GPU and CPU can jointly access the shared memory on the package (unified memory). This is available in 36 and 96 GB variants and offers 400 GB/s maximum bandwidth (512 bit bus).

The integrated 16-core Neural Engine has also been revised and now offers 18 TOPS peak performance (compared to 15.8 TOPS in the M2 but 35 TOPS in the new A17 Pro). The video engine now also supports AV1 decoding in hardware. H.264, HEVC and ProRes (RAW) can still be decoded and encoded. Like its predecessor, the Max chip offers two video engines and can therefore encode and decode two streams simultaneously.

Unfortunately, the integrated WLAN only continues to support WiFi 6E (no WiFi 7), unlike the small M3 SoC thunderbolt 4 is also supported (max 40 Gbit/s).

The chip is manufactured in the current 3nm process (N3B) at TSMC and contains 92 billion transistors (+37% vs. Apple M2 Max).

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100

The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 is a pretty fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops. The X1E-80-100 is the second-fastest member of the Snapdragon X series, as of May 2024; as such, it has 12 Oryon CPU cores (3 clusters of equally powerful cores; 12 threads) running at up to 4.0 GHz, the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The faster Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 is thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU and the same number of CPU cores but with a higher GPU and CPU clock speeds.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if it is is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The Qualcomm SoC is thought to have at least 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

When all of the 12 cores are under load, they can run at up to 3.4 GHz. The much more desirable 4.0 GHz clock speed is only achievable under single-thread or dual-thread loads.

Given the very similar clock speeds, its multi-thread benchmark scores should be about the same as that of the X1E-78-100 for Ryzen 7 7840U and Apple M3-like performance in most real-world tasks. We'll make sure to update this section once we get our hands on a system powered by the X1E-80-100.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The integrated 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that delivers up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is somewhat underwhelming. While slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno is not fast enough to outpace the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1E-80-100 is most likely going to be less power-hungry than its more powerful brother (the latter can be set to consume up to 80 Watts). Expect to see anything between 20 W and 45 W under long-term workloads because that's what Ryzen HS chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

ModelApple M3 Max 14-CoreQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
SeriesApple Apple M3Qualcomm Snapdragon X
Series: Snapdragon X Oryon
Apple M3 Max 16-Core compare2.75 - 4.06 GHz16 / 16 cores
Apple M3 Max 14-Core « 2.75 - 4.06 GHz14 / 14 cores
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core compare2.75 - 4.06 GHz12 / 12 cores
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core compare2.75 - 4.06 GHz11 / 11 cores
Apple M3 compare2.75 - 4.06 GHz8 / 8 cores
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 compare - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 « - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 compare - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 compare - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 compare8 / 8 cores Oryon
Clock2748 - 4056 MHz <=4000 MHz
Cores / Threads14 / 14
10 x 4.1 GHz Apple M3 P-Core
4 x 2.7 GHz Apple M3 E-Core
12 / 12
12 x 4.0 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
TDP78 Watt
Transistors92000 Million
Technology3 nm4 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction Set
iGPUApple M3 Max 30-Core GPUQualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.apple.comwww.qualcomm.com
CodenameOryon
TDP Turbo PL280 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100
37.7 pt (52%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
123 Points (85%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
893 Points (17%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
9927 Points (9%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1321 Points (56%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
490 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3640 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2249 Points (14%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
248 Points (75%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
44404 MIPS (25%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5359 MIPS (64%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.8 fps (12%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
637 Seconds (8%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
351 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
14877 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
18559 Points (33%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2845 Points (77%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
14458 Points (57%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
400.3 ms (0%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
92123 Points (81%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
4.7 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
3.3 Watt (4%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 30. 16:36:04

#0 checking url part for id 16356 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17575 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719758164 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.01s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 16356 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#7 got single benchmarks 16356 +0s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17575 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 17575 +0.005s ... 0.021s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.035s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.037s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)