Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 740 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

Qualcomm Adreno 740

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 740

The Qualcomm Adreno 740 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SoC. The chip will be available starting early 2023 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices. 

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno GPU offers a 25% improved performance compared to the Adreno 730 predecessor in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. First benchmarks show that the Adreno GPU can even beat the Apple A16 GPU (iPhone 14 Pro series) in synthetic benchmarks. Therefore, the Adreno 740 is the fastest graphics chip for smartphones in 2022.

The iGPU supports hardware accelerated ray tracing and a game post processing accelerator (for bloom, depth of field and motion blur). Another first, is the support for Vulkan 1.3.

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is produced in the modern 4nm process at TSMC.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a professional workstation graphics card for laptops. It was announced early 2017 and is intended for Kaby-Lake based professional high-end notebooks. The AMD Radeon Pro (formerly known as FirePro) is the counterpart to the Quadro series from Nvidia and offers certified drivers for professional 3D applications (CAD and DCC).

The WX7100 is based on the Polaris 10 or 20 chip and offers 2304 shaders like the older AMD Radeon RX 480  (Polaris 10) or newer Radeon RX 580 (Polaris 20)

For more information on the features and specifications of the Polaris architecture, visit our in depth article here.

Qualcomm Adreno 740AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX Series
Adreno 750 compare
Adreno 740
Adreno 730 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Radeon Pro WX 7100 2304 @ 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4150 compare 896 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4130 compare 640 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 3200 compare 640 @ 1.08 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 2100 compare 512 @ 1.22 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Shared Memoryyesno
APIOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12, OpenGL Vulkan
technology4 nm14 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSync
Date of Announcement16.11.2022 01.03.2017
CodenamePolaris 12
ArchitecturePolaris
Pipelines2304 - unified
Core Speed1243 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com
CPU in Adreno 740GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy8 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 28 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 9805     avg: 13955     median: 14017.5 (7%)     max: 14789 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3088     avg: 3648     median: 3701 (4%)     max: 3900 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 18     avg: 29.1     median: 30 (12%)     max: 33 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 24     avg: 59.9     median: 62 (11%)     max: 72 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 82     avg: 144.6     median: 153 (11%)     max: 181 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 740
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 301     avg: 453.3     median: 479 (4%)     max: 502 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 208.55     avg: 211     median: 210.4 (1%)     max: 214.17 fps
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 6.49     avg: 9.6     median: 9.7 (4%)     max: 14.5 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 740 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 740:
60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra Ultra
100%
Adreno 740:
60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 740:
58.5  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 740:
59 59.2 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 740:
59 60 60 60 60 61 63 117 119 120 ~ 78 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 740:
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 87.8 89 90 90 ~ 71 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 740:
60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
100%
Adreno 740:
59 59.3 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 740:
40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
100%
Adreno 740:
60  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 740:
116  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 740:
60  fps
high
100%
Adreno 740:
60  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Adreno 740:
120  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 740 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Qualcomm Adreno 740lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal6060
Genshin Impact58.560
Armajet78
PUBG Mobile71606040
World of Tanks Blitz60
Dead Trigger 2116
Asphalt 9: Legends6060
Subway Surfers120
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
3


1


5
1

1
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 28. 06:16:10

#0 checking url part for id 11440 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7964 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719548169 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.056s ... 0.056s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.056s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.056s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11440 +0.019s ... 0.075s

#8 got single benchmarks 11440 +0.029s ... 0.105s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7964 +0.001s ... 0.105s

#10 got single benchmarks 7964 +0s ... 0.105s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.105s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.117s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.117s

#14 Got 97 rows for game benchmarks. +0.023s ... 0.139s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.139s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.14s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.143s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.143s

#19 return log +0.002s ... 0.145s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)