Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 725 vs Qualcomm Adreno 620

Qualcomm Adreno 725

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 725

The Qualcomm Adreno 725 is an integrated graphics unit for smartphones and tablets, which is used in the Snapdragon 7+ Gen. 2 and is designed for smartphones as well as tablets. The associated SoC (system-on-a-chip) was introduced at the beginning of 2023. 

Qualcomm promises a performance increase of up to 100 percent compared with the predecessor Adreno 644.

The Adreno 725 supports all common Android APIs like Vulkan 1.1 and is already prepared for use with the Unreal 5 engine.

Qualcomm Adreno 620

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 620

The Qualcomm Adreno 620 is a mobile graphics card for upper mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G and 765 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 620 in the 765G is 10% faster than the one in the 765 and 20% faster than the old Adreno 618. In our benchmarks, the Adreno 620 in the Snapdragon 765G even was 25% faster in selected benchmarks, but the faster CPU will also influence the results.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 725Qualcomm Adreno 620
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 750 compare
Adreno 740 compare
Adreno 730 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1
technology4 nm14 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 11_1)
Date of Announcement30.11.2021 09.04.2019
ArchitectureAdreno 600
CPU in Adreno 725GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 28 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 620GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7658 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 56690     avg: 67038     median: 68764 (8%)     max: 70216 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
11837 Points (51%)
min: 3678     avg: 4551     median: 4663 (20%)     max: 4893 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
20476 Points (45%)
min: 4036     avg: 5146     median: 5344 (12%)     max: 5437 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
10274 Points (51%)
min: 2934     avg: 3394     median: 3494 (17%)     max: 3605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
14801 Points (44%)
min: 2814     avg: 3435     median: 3554 (11%)     max: 3592 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
7701 Points (4%)
min: 1022     avg: 1402     median: 1604 (1%)     max: 1681 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
1968 Points (2%)
min: 443     avg: 443.5     median: 443.5 (1%)     max: 444 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
16 fps (7%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
34 fps (6%)
min: 5.3     avg: 8.3     median: 8.5 (2%)     max: 13 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
35 fps (3%)
min: 12     avg: 21.5     median: 23 (2%)     max: 24 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
79 fps (9%)
min: 12     avg: 19.7     median: 21 (2%)     max: 21 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
137 fps (3%)
min: 22     avg: 35     median: 37 (1%)     max: 38 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
232 fps (14%)
min: 31     avg: 50.9     median: 54 (3%)     max: 56 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 725
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
359 fps (3%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 620
min: 48     avg: 88.4     median: 95 (1%)     max: 97 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 333810     avg: 347058     median: 347058 (43%)     max: 360306 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
120.9 fps (1%)
30.4 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
4056 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
5338 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 11776     avg: 21536     median: 21536 (22%)     max: 31296 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 5334     avg: 16658     median: 16657.5 (29%)     max: 27981 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
6.3 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 725 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 620 → 30% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 620:
60  fps
high
Adreno 620:
60  fps
ultra
Adreno 620:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 725:
56  fps
med.
Adreno 620:
52  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 725:
32  fps
72%
Adreno 620:
23  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 725:
54  fps
139%
Adreno 620:
60 90 ~ 75 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 725:
60  fps
63%
Adreno 620:
30 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps
med.
Adreno 620:
40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Adreno 725:
60  fps
52%
Adreno 620:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 40 ~ 31 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 725:
40  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 620:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
ultra
Adreno 620:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 620:
62 120 ~ 91 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 620:
29 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Adreno 620:
21 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 29 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 725 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 620 → 81%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 58%

Qualcomm Adreno 620lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift606060
Genshin Impact5223
Armajet75
PUBG Mobile384031
Arena of Valor4545
Dead Trigger 291
Asphalt 9: Legends3029
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3
1

2

1
1
3
1
1
1






Qualcomm Adreno 725lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact5632
Armajet54
PUBG Mobile606040
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1




1
1

2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 01:18:51

#0 checking url part for id 11590 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10317 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720048731 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:16:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11590 +0.018s ... 0.021s

#8 got single benchmarks 11590 +0.004s ... 0.025s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10317 +0s ... 0.025s

#10 got single benchmarks 10317 +0.016s ... 0.041s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.055s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.055s

#14 Got 50 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.063s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.063s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.063s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.066s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.066s

#19 return log +0.002s ... 0.068s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)