Qualcomm Adreno 690 vs Qualcomm Adreno 725 vs Qualcomm Adreno 730
Qualcomm Adreno 690 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 690 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm, the 690 is up to 60% faster than the previous generation. In our tests with the Lenovo ThinkPad X13s, the Adreno 690 was only on par with a low en Intel UHD Graphics iGPU and not well suited for 3D games.
The chip is manufactured in 5nm at Samsung (5LPE) and suited for fanless laptops.
Qualcomm Adreno 725 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 725 is an integrated graphics unit for smartphones and tablets, which is used in the Snapdragon 7+ Gen. 2 and is designed for smartphones as well as tablets. The associated SoC (system-on-a-chip) was introduced at the beginning of 2023.
Qualcomm promises a performance increase of up to 100 percent compared with the predecessor Adreno 644 .
The Adreno 725 supports all common Android APIs like Vulkan 1.1 and is already prepared for use with the Unreal 5 engine.
Qualcomm Adreno 730 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 730 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SoC . The chip will be available starting early 2022 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 730 GPU offers a 30% improved performance thanks to 30% more ALUs over the Adreno 660 , its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 888 SoC. Thanks to the new 4nm process, the power efficiency should also be improved.
The Adreno 730 supports Vulkan 1.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP.
Qualcomm Adreno 690 Qualcomm Adreno 725 Qualcomm Adreno 730 Adreno 700 Series Shared Memory yes yes yes API DirectX 12 DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 Power Consumption 7 Watt technology 5 nm 4 nm 4 nm Date of Announcement 06.12.2018 30.11.2021 30.11.2021 Core Speed 800 (Boost) MHz 800 (Boost) MHz Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Adreno 690
1.3 pt (4%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
909 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
811 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 8602 avg: 9818 median: 9818 (10%) max: 11034 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 13768 avg: 16708 median: 16707.5 (4%) max: 19647 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2758 avg: 2835 median: 2834.5 (5%) max: 2911 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2837 avg: 2933 median: 2932.5 (3%) max: 3028 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
14652 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
11837 Points (51%)
min: 1067 avg: 11770 median: 11974 (52%) max: 15306 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
20476 Points (45%)
min: 15268 avg: 24195 median: 25285 (56%) max: 27751 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
10274 Points (51%)
min: 5983 avg: 10709 median: 10618 (53%) max: 13386 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
14801 Points (44%)
min: 11082 avg: 17815 median: 18581 (56%) max: 20955 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
7701 Points (4%)
min: 6483 avg: 10241 median: 10384 (5%) max: 11201 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
3067 Points (4%)
1968 Points (2%)
min: 1567 avg: 2534 median: 2549 (3%) max: 2899 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3063 avg: 3085 median: 3077 (4%) max: 3115 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2898 avg: 2930 median: 2912 (3%) max: 2979 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 690 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
558 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 13.4 avg: 13.7 median: 13.7 (1%) max: 14 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 690 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
16 fps (7%)
min: 13 avg: 19.7 median: 20 (8%) max: 23 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
34 fps (6%)
min: 19 avg: 41 median: 41.5 (8%) max: 52 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
35 fps (3%)
min: 60 avg: 103.8 median: 101 (7%) max: 138 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
79 fps (9%)
min: 50 avg: 84.6 median: 84 (9%) max: 108 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
137 fps (3%)
min: 95 avg: 142.6 median: 136 (3%) max: 189 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
232 fps (14%)
min: 126 avg: 208.6 median: 209 (12%) max: 282 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 725 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
359 fps (3%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 730
min: 245 avg: 385.5 median: 381 (3%) max: 468 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 333810 avg: 347058 median: 347058 (43%) max: 360306 Points
min: 293017 avg: 423760 median: 430076 (54%) max: 479126 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
120.9 fps (1%)
min: 128.28 avg: 144.8 median: 144.8 (1%) max: 161.33 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
4056 Points (1%)
min: 5301 avg: 5418 median: 5418 (2%) max: 5535 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
5338 Points (2%)
min: 6354 avg: 6655 median: 6503 (2%) max: 7108 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 17 avg: 19.7 median: 19.7 (3%) max: 22.3 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
15.8 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
16.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
6.3 Watt (2%)
min: 5.52 avg: 9.5 median: 9.6 (4%) max: 14.2 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 690 → 100% n=1 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 725 → 64% n=1 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 730 → 83% n=1
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Adreno 730:
60 60 [X] Honor Magic Vs 1.7.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 730
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 730:
60 60 [X] Honor Magic Vs 1.7.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 730
min:
58 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 730:
60 60 [X] Sony Xperia 5 IV 3.5.0.6093
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 730
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 60 fps
Adreno 730:
60 60 61 [X] Xiaomi 12 Pro 3.0.0.5295
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 730
min:
60 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 60 fps
Adreno 730:
55 [X] Oppo Find X5 Pro 1.0.30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 730
min:
54 fps, max:
56 fps
91 ~ 73 fps
Adreno 730:
55 [X] Oppo Find X5 Pro 1.0.30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 730
min:
9 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 730:
55 [X] Oppo Find X5 Pro 1.0.30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 730
min:
53 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 58 fps
Adreno 730:
35 [X] Xiaomi 12 Pro 2.4.0_5199000_5224067
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 730
min:
21 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 730:
35 [X] Xiaomi 12 Pro 2.4.0_5199000_5224067
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 730
min:
25 fps, max:
36 fps
60 [X] Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro 4.3.0_19705728_19706476
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 730
min:
51 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 48 fps
Adreno 730:
30 34 [X] Xiaomi 12 Pro 2.4.0_5199000_5224067
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 730
min:
22 fps, max:
36 fps
60 [X] Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro 4.3.0_19705728_19706476
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 730
min:
53 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 41 fps
Adreno 730:
60 [X] Vivo X80 Pro 1.8.18
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 730
min:
58 fps, max:
61 fps
60 [X] Sony Xperia 5 IV 1.8.22
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 730
min:
59 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 60 fps
Adreno 730:
30 [X] Xiaomi 12 3.3.7a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 730
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
60 ~ 45 fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 690 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Qualcomm Adreno 690 low med. high ultra QHD 4K F1 22 26 22.5 17 12.6 X-Plane 11.11 14 12 11 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 19 12.3 7.29 Dota 2 Reborn 58 55 44 37 The Witcher 3 25 16 10 4 GTA V 29.9 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 5 1 4 1 4 1 2 1
Qualcomm Adreno 730 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 60 60 League of Legends: Wild Rift 110 60 60 Call of Duty Mobile 73 55 58 Genshin Impact 35 48 41 Armajet 75 PUBG Mobile 59 59 57 40 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 45 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 3 2 3 3 3 2
Qualcomm Adreno 725 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Genshin Impact 56 32 Armajet 54 PUBG Mobile 60 60 40 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 2
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.28
log 01. 23:15:22
#0 checking url part for id 11411 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 11590 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 11105 +0s ... 0s
#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719868520 +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:16:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.029s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.029s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11411 +0.031s ... 0.06s
#9 got single benchmarks 11411 +0.005s ... 0.065s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11590 +0s ... 0.065s
#11 got single benchmarks 11590 +0.004s ... 0.069s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11105 +0s ... 0.069s
#13 got single benchmarks 11105 +0.035s ... 0.104s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.104s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.025s ... 0.129s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.129s
#17 Got 182 rows for game benchmarks. +0.024s ... 0.153s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.153s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.154s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.006s ... 0.16s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.16s
#22 return log +0.001s ... 0.16s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)