Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A4-7210 vs Intel Core i7-13800H

AMD A4-7210

► remove from comparison AMD A4-7210

The AMD A4-7210 is a mobile quad-core SoC (codenamed "Carrizo-L") for entry-level devices and subnotebooks, which has been presented in May 2015. In addition to 4 CPU cores clocked at up to 2.2 GHz (boost clock), the 28 nanometer chip also integrates a Radeon R3 GPU, a single-channel DDR3L-1600 memory controller and the southbridge with various I/O-ports. The TDP of the A4-7210 can be configured from 12 to 25 Watt. The predecessor AMD A4-6210 features similar specifications except the slower clock speed (at least boost), the configurable TDP, and the new FP4 package (compatible to the mainstream Carrizo SoCs). 

Architecture

Carrizo-L, Beema (for notebooks) and Mullins (for tablets and compact subnotebooks, same die) are based on AMD's Puma+ architecture, which is the successor to the previous Jaguar design (Kabini and Temash APUs). Neither the performance per clock nor the feature set (including SSE up to 4.2, AVX and AES) have been modified. However, AMD managed to reduce the leakage current, enabling significantly higher (boost) clock speeds. This leads to a more responsive system and better overall performance. As its predecessor, the chip is manufactured in 28 nm.

Performance

The processor performance depends on the configured TDP of the SoC. Set to 25 Watt, the CPU should be faster than the old A6-6210.

Graphics

The integrated Radeon R3 should be similar to the Beema based Radeon R3 GPU with 128 shaders. In our first review sample the GPU was clocked at 686 MHz and therefore 86 MHz faster than in the A4-6210. Only a few current games (as of 2014) are thus playable in low settings.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the entire SoC is rated at 12 to 25 watts. Thus, the APU is also suitable for small subnotebooks.

Intel Core i7-13800H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13800H

The Intel Core i9-13900H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Raptor Lake-H series (Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.5 to 5.2 GHz (single core turbo, all-core 4.8 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 4 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports the full set of vPro Enterprise management features.

Performance

Thanks to the high core count and high clock speed, the Core i7-13800H should be faster than the older Core i9-12900HK. Therefore, the CPU is very well suited for all demanding use cases like gaming, content creation, and scientific calculations.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from 4800 MHz for the 12th gen). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) .

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (115 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7 (improved over the 12th Gen).

ModelAMD A4-7210Intel Core i7-13800H
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-H
CodenameCarrizo-LRaptor Lake-H
Series: Raptor Lake-H Raptor Lake-H
AMD A8-7410 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-7310 compare2 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A4-7210 « 1.8 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Core i9-13900HK compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H « 1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H compare2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H compare1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock1800 - 2200 MHz1800 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB1.2 MB
L2 Cache2 MB11.5 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 414 / 20
TDP12-25 Watt45 Watt
Transistors930 Million
Technology28 nm10 nm
SocketFP4 BGAFCBGA1744
FeaturesMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTThread Director
iGPUAMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) ( - 686 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.comark.intel.com
L3 Cache24 MB
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13800H
46.8 pt (65%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
119.3 Points (83%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
976 Points (18%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
17591 Points (16%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2017 Points (86%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
776 Points (86%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6714 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
157 Points (1%)
2765 Points (17%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
46 Points (14%)
287 Points (86%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 A4-7210 +
2 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 A4-7210 +
0.6 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 A4-7210 +
1732 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 A4-7210 +
5593 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 A4-7210 +
856 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 A4-7210 +
26.9 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 A4-7210 +
1236 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
70500 MIPS (40%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6310 MIPS (75%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 A4-7210 +
10.9 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 A4-7210 +
51.3 fps (12%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
20 fps (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 A4-7210 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 A4-7210 +
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 A4-7210 +
1.2 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
337 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
191 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 A4-7210 +
2681 Points (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 A4-7210 +
36.9 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 A4-7210 +
79.7 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 A4-7210 +
1608 s (7%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 A4-7210 +
5547 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1800     avg: 1886     median: 1886 (5%)     max: 1972 Points
23253 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 A4-7210 +
21617 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 A4-7210 +
24223 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 A4-7210 +
min: 1881     avg: 1915     median: 1914.5 (5%)     max: 1948 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2301 Points (4%)
29543 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
12662 Points (53%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2766 Points (74%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
12876 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1972 Points (83%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12880 Points (23%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 A4-7210 +
3524 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 A4-7210 +
1207 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
477 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 A4-7210 +
264.5 ms (3%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
283 Points (81%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
314 Points (65%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1823 Points (70%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
150.1 Watt (26%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
155.6 Watt (28%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.6 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
8.9 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
17.8 Points per Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A4-7210 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13800H → 1225% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 16:19:35

#0 checking url part for id 6864 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14719 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720102775 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 6864 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#7 got single benchmarks 6864 +0.006s ... 0.012s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14719 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 14719 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.024s ... 0.043s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.045s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)