Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A4-3320M vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9400

AMD A4-3320M

► remove from comparison AMD A4-3320M

The AMD A4-3320M (Codename Llano) is a dual-core processor for entry level laptops. It is part of the Fusion family of APUs (=Accelerated Processing Units) and features an integrated Radeon HD 6480G graphics card. The processor core is clocked at 2 GHz base clock speed and is able to automatically overclock up to 2.6GHz (TurboCore, depending on temperature and used cores). 

The processor core is based on the Husky familiy 12h. Compared to the older Phenom II mobile processors, the Husky core is very similar but features an additional hardware divider. However, the performance per clock should be similar to the old Turion II, Athlon II, Phenom II mobile processors (as the Llano APU they did not feature a Level 3 cache).

The performance of the processor part should be comparable to a previous AMD Athlon II M340. Due to TurboCore the single threaded performance should be slightly better and the multithreaded slightly slower. Therefore, the performance is clearly worse than similar clocked Sandy Bridge based processors (e.g. Core i3-2310M).

The Llano APUs feature an integrated DirectX 11 capable graphics card with a maximum of 400 cores. The AMD Radeon HD 6480G called version in the A4-Series however offers only 240 cores at 444MHz. It has no dedicated memory and also is not able to use the integrated cache (in difference to the Intel HD 3000). Furthermore the APU also features an integrated UVD3 video processor to fully decode most used HD videos (like H.264, VC-1, MPEG4).

The A4-3320M also features an integrated dual-channel memory controller with support for DDR3(L)-1333 memory and a PCIe 2.0 controller.

The TDP of 35 Watt for the APU (including graphics card and memory controller) makes it best suited for 14 to 15-inch laptops.

Intel Core 2 Duo T9400

► remove from comparison Intel T9400

The Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 was a uppder middle class dual core CPU for laptops, at the time of introduction. It is similar to the Core 2 Duo P9500 except for the higher TDP of 35 versus 25 Watt).

Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the T9400 offers enough performance for most demanding games (in 2009) and applications.

The T9400 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).

ModelAMD A4-3320MIntel Core 2 Duo T9400
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameLlanoPenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
AMD A8-3550MX compare2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-3530MX compare1.9 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-3510MX compare1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-3430MX compare1.7 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-3520M compare1.6 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-3410MX compare1.6 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-3500M compare1.5 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-3420M compare1.5 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-3400M compare1.4 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A4-3330MX compare2.2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-3310MX compare2.1 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-3320M « 2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-3300M compare1.9 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-3305M compare1.9 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 « 2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 - 2600 MHz2530 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors1000 Million410 Million
32 nm45 nm, 1.050V-1.162V
Die Size226 mm2107 mm2
Features3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, DDR3 Memory Controller, Radeon HD 6480GVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 6480G (444 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
FSB1066
L1 Cache128 KB
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA479, PGA478
$316 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T9400 +
min: 2713     avg: 2848     median: 2818 (17%)     max: 3207 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T9400 +
min: 5008     avg: 5341     median: 5267.5 (4%)     max: 6173 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T9400 +
1641 s (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T9400 +
min: 30.1     avg: 37.7     median: 31 (6%)     max: 52.1 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T9400 +
min: 2026     avg: 2262     median: 2304 (5%)     max: 2349 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T9400 +
min: 17.75     avg: 18.1     median: 18.1 (4%)     max: 18.55 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T9400 +
min: 42.53     avg: 43.1     median: 43 (2%)     max: 44.02 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T9400 +
min: 1107     avg: 1150     median: 1164 (5%)     max: 1180 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T9400 +
23652 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T9400 +
17818 MFLOPS (14%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T9400 +
min: 2293     avg: 5930     median: 6175 (13%)     max: 7555 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T9400 +
5.4 Points (77%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T9400 +
min: 3066     avg: 4502     median: 4892 (4%)     max: 5156 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 30. 17:07:26

#0 checking url part for id 2865 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 393 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719760046 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 2865 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#7 got single benchmarks 2865 +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 393 +0s ... 0.006s

#9 got single benchmarks 393 +0.013s ... 0.019s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.024s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.026s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)