Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A4-3320M vs Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300

AMD A4-3320M

► remove from comparison AMD A4-3320M

The AMD A4-3320M (Codename Llano) is a dual-core processor for entry level laptops. It is part of the Fusion family of APUs (=Accelerated Processing Units) and features an integrated Radeon HD 6480G graphics card. The processor core is clocked at 2 GHz base clock speed and is able to automatically overclock up to 2.6GHz (TurboCore, depending on temperature and used cores). 

The processor core is based on the Husky familiy 12h. Compared to the older Phenom II mobile processors, the Husky core is very similar but features an additional hardware divider. However, the performance per clock should be similar to the old Turion II, Athlon II, Phenom II mobile processors (as the Llano APU they did not feature a Level 3 cache).

The performance of the processor part should be comparable to a previous AMD Athlon II M340. Due to TurboCore the single threaded performance should be slightly better and the multithreaded slightly slower. Therefore, the performance is clearly worse than similar clocked Sandy Bridge based processors (e.g. Core i3-2310M).

The Llano APUs feature an integrated DirectX 11 capable graphics card with a maximum of 400 cores. The AMD Radeon HD 6480G called version in the A4-Series however offers only 240 cores at 444MHz. It has no dedicated memory and also is not able to use the integrated cache (in difference to the Intel HD 3000). Furthermore the APU also features an integrated UVD3 video processor to fully decode most used HD videos (like H.264, VC-1, MPEG4).

The A4-3320M also features an integrated dual-channel memory controller with support for DDR3(L)-1333 memory and a PCIe 2.0 controller.

The TDP of 35 Watt for the APU (including graphics card and memory controller) makes it best suited for 14 to 15-inch laptops.

Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 is a CULV laptop processor for small and light laptops. Due to the small clock speed, the CPU is specified with a TDP of only 10 Watt. For non demanding tasks, the performance of both cores is sufficient. Many laptops with the SU7300 feature an overclocking option to run the CPU at higher clock rates (e.g. 1.7 GHz in the Asus UL series). Compared to the Atom series, the SU7300 is signifantly faster.

ModelAMD A4-3320MIntel Core 2 Duo SU7300
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameLlanoPenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
AMD A8-3550MX compare2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-3530MX compare1.9 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-3510MX compare1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-3430MX compare1.7 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-3520M compare1.6 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-3410MX compare1.6 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-3500M compare1.5 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-3420M compare1.5 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-3400M compare1.4 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A4-3330MX compare2.2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-3310MX compare2.1 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-3320M « 2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-3300M compare1.9 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-3305M compare1.9 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 « 1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 - 2600 MHz1300 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt10 Watt
Transistors1000 Million410 Million
Technology32 nm45 nm
Die Size226 mm2107 mm2
Features3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, DDR3 Memory Controller, Radeon HD 6480GEnhanced Speedstep, VT-x, TXT
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 6480G (444 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
FSB800
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA956
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 SU7300 +
392 Points (0%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 SU7300 +
208 Points (9%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 SU7300 +
84 Points (9%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 149     avg: 154.5     median: 154.5 (0%)     max: 160 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 72     avg: 72.2     median: 72.2 (0%)     max: 72.4 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 38.39     avg: 38.7     median: 38.7 (12%)     max: 39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 0.77     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.79 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.4 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 869     avg: 1462     median: 1496 (9%)     max: 1645 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 1642     avg: 2777     median: 2813 (2%)     max: 3181 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 3020     avg: 3045     median: 3045.5 (2%)     max: 3067 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 1501     avg: 1576     median: 1586 (2%)     max: 1629 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 2029     avg: 3417     median: 3615 (43%)     max: 4608 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 37.2     avg: 67.6     median: 61.3 (12%)     max: 118.5 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
885 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 2492     avg: 2515     median: 2514.5 (1%)     max: 2537 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 1445     avg: 1450     median: 1450 (17%)     max: 1455 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
4.8 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
26.5 fps (6%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 SU7300 +
0.5 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 SU7300 +
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 SU7300 +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 SU7300 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 SU7300 +
8394 Seconds (59%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 2.84     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (62%)     max: 2.86 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 1078     avg: 1167     median: 1178 (3%)     max: 1229 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 22     avg: 34.2     median: 37.2 (8%)     max: 38 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 54     avg: 78     median: 85 (4%)     max: 88 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 1341     avg: 1830     median: 2059 (9%)     max: 2091 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 10480     avg: 11679     median: 11968.5 (6%)     max: 12300 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 8790     avg: 9118     median: 8911 (7%)     max: 9860 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 2440     avg: 2819     median: 2819 (6%)     max: 3198 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 SU7300 +
4.2 Points (60%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 SU7300 +
4.1 Points (53%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 2303     avg: 2494     median: 2579 (2%)     max: 2600 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 SU7300 +
11926 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 SU7300 +
983 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SU7300 +
207 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SU7300 +
392 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1024 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1707 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
1536 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
855 Points (13%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 17:22:59

#0 checking url part for id 2865 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 503 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720106579 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 2865 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#7 got single benchmarks 2865 +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 503 +0s ... 0.004s

#9 got single benchmarks 503 +0.002s ... 0.007s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.007s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.009s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.011s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.012s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.012s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.018s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.018s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.018s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.019s

#19 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.019s

#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.021s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)