Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A10 Pro-7350B vs Intel Core i7-1270P

AMD A10 Pro-7350B

► remove from comparison AMD A10 Pro-7350B

The AMD A10 Pro-7350B is a power efficient ULV (Ultra Low Voltage) quad-core processor based on the Kaveri architecture. It was revealed in June 2014 for notebooks and is manufactured by GlobalFoundries using a 28 nm SHP process. In addition to having two CPU modules for a total of four integer cores clocked at 2.1 - 3.3 GHz, the AMD chip also integrates a Radeon R6 GPU clocked at up to 553 MHz with 384 GCN shaders and a dual-channel DDR3-1600 memory controller.

Technically, the 7350B is almost identical with the consumer model FX-7500. However, AMD guarantees an especially high stability and durability for the business-oriented Pro-Series.

Architecture 

Kaveri is the successor to the 2013 Richland architecture (e.g. A10-5750M). The revised CPU cores, codenamed Steamroller, represent the third generation of the module-based Bulldozer design. A number of major changes include modified decoders (now one per integer core), optimized branch prediction, and increased L1 I-cache from 64 KB to 96 KB per module. These revisions boost the performance per clock slightly over a similarly clocked Richland APU. For more details about the AMD Kaveri architecture, see our detailed analysis here:

Analysis of the AMD Kaveri Notebook Platform

Performance 

According to our benchmarks (shown below), the A10 Pro-7350B offers a CPU performance level similar to the Haswell-based Intel Core i3-4100U. Overall, the 7350B will be sufficient for all daily workloads (Office, Internet browsing, multimedia) as well as light multitasking.

Graphics

The Radeon R6 (Kaveri) GPU of the A10 Pro-7350B features a core clock of up to 553 MHz and 384 shader units. Since the GPU is based on AMD's GCN 1.1 architecture, both DirectX 11.2 "Tier 2" and Mantle are supported. Furthermore, the GPU can be used for general purpose computing in various applications, such as Adobe Photoshop via the OpenCL API. 

In terms of 3D performance, the GPU is almost as fast as a dedicated GeForce GT 720M and can handle many current games at low or medium settings at (W)XGA resolution.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 19 Watts, which is somewhat above the Haswell ULV CPUs from Intel (15 W including chipset). Nevertheless, the A10 Pro-7350B is suited for 12 - 13-inch notebooks or larger.

Intel Core i7-1270P

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1270P

The Intel Core i7-1270P is a higher-end Alder Lake-P family CPU, an expensive 28 W part meant for use in ultra-light, ultra-thin (yet actively cooled) laptops. This CPU was announced in early 2022 and it has 4 performance cores as opposed to the 6 cores of the top-of-the-line 1280P (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) mated to 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores are Hyper-Threading-enabled for a total of 16 threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock speeds range from 2.2 GHz to 4.8 GHz for the performance cluster and 1.6 GHz to 3.5 GHz for the efficient cluster. Full vPro feature set is supported by this Core i7 ("Enterprise" tier, allowing for remote device management). Its shortcomings as compared with the mighty i7-1280P include the smaller L3 cache, lower core count, lower clock speeds; the performance is slated to be significantly lower as a result.

A brief look at the specifications instantly reveals this i7 series chip to be very similar to the Core i5-12600H, a more power-hungry processor targeted at gaming laptops.

Architecture

The i7 is a continuation of Intel's efforts to use the ARM-developed big.LITTLE technology for its own benefit. A single "little" Alder Lake core is supposed to be as fast as a Skylake core (as found in the venerable Core i7-6700HQ among other options) which is six years old at this point. All of an Intel Core i7-1270P's CPU cores enjoy access to 18 MB of L3 cache. The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to LPDDR5-5200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR4x-4267 or DDR4-3200. Intel suggests using no more than 64 GB, for reference. Just like the other 12th Gen Intel Core processors, Core i7-1270P comes with Thread Director which is a new functionality designed to help Windows 11 decide which cores to use for what workload for best performance and efficiency possible. Hardware acceleration of AI algorithms is supported via GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). PCI-Express 5.0 support has not found its way into Alder Lake P processors, so users will have to be content with PCI-Express 4.0 for the time being. Four PCI-Express 4 lanes allow for a read/write rate of up to 7.9 GB/s, provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets soldered permanently on to the motherboard (BGA1744 socket interface).

Performance

The 12 CPU cores are not just able to outshine any outgoing quad-core Tiger Lake part, the i7-1195G7 included. The average 1270P in our database directly competes with the Ryzen 7 5825U, the Ryzen 7 7730U and the Ryzen 7 7735U, meaning this little Core i7 is fast enough to make most consumers happy as of mid 2023.

The fairly high processing power comes at a cost. A single Golden Cove core can consume more than 20 W when under heavy load. Your mileage may thus vary depending on how high the Power Limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The built-in graphics adapter in the form of the 96 EU Iris Xe running at up to 1.40 GHz has seen no change from what was built into the 11th Gen Tiger Lake-UP3 processors, like an i7-1165G7, which is hardly a downside as this iGPU is loaded with modern features such as AV1 video decoding capability and SUHD 4320p monitor support. Up to 4 monitors can be used simultaneously with this iGPU. We expect the gaming performance to be reasonably close to that of NVIDIA's MX350.

In other words, the Xe is good enough for most games at 1080p resolution / Medium settings, provided the Power Limits are high enough and the cooling solution is competent enough. Fast RAM is a prerequisite for decent performance as well (the Xe has to make do with no dedicated video memory).

Last but not the least, we discovered that the GPU utilization when playing YouTube UHD 2160p60 videos is higher than it was with Tiger Lake chips.

Power consumption

The i7's base power consumption (also known as the default TDP or Power Limit 1) is 28 W, with 64 W being its maximum Turbo power consumption (also known as the PL2). As for the "Minimum Assured" power consumption, Intel's guidelines mention 20 W. All in all, an active cooling solution is a must for such a chip.

The CPU is built with Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency. It's still a rather power-hungry CPU; a single P-core will happily consume more than 20 W when under heavy load. A couple of the higher-end 7 nm U-class AMD Ryzen 5000 chips are not nearly as power-hungry while delivering similar or higher performance levels.

ModelAMD A10 Pro-7350BIntel Core i7-1270P
SeriesAMD KaveriIntel Alder Lake-P
CodenameKaveriAlder Lake-P
Series: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-P
AMD FX-7600P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-7400P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-7200P compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-7500 compare2.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10 Pro-7350B « 2.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-7300 compare1.9 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8 Pro-7150B compare1.9 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-7100 compare1.8 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6 Pro-7050B compare2.2 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-7000 compare2.2 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i7-1280P compare1.3 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1270P « 1.6 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260P compare1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1250P compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240P compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1220P compare1.1 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock2100 - 3300 MHz1600 - 4800 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB10 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 412 / 16
TDP19 Watt28 Watt
Transistors2410 Million
Technology28 nm10 nm
Die Size245 mm2
FeaturesSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 ControllerDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, Rem. Platf. Erase, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri) (? - 553 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache1.1 MB
L3 Cache18 MB
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1744

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1270P
37.7 pt (52%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 8426     avg: 9718     median: 9718 (9%)     max: 11010 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1552     avg: 1620     median: 1620 (69%)     max: 1688 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 595     avg: 611     median: 611 (68%)     max: 627 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3167     avg: 3536     median: 3536 (9%)     max: 3905 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 151     avg: 160     median: 162 (1%)     max: 167 Points
min: 1695     avg: 1739     median: 1739 (11%)     max: 1783 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 49     avg: 55.3     median: 55 (17%)     max: 62 Points
min: 226     avg: 229.5     median: 229.5 (69%)     max: 233 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.69     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (2%)     max: 1.91 Points
19.9 Points (26%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.63     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (17%)     max: 0.7 Points
2.7 Points (68%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1907     avg: 2004     median: 2003.5 (12%)     max: 2100 Points
7886 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4951     avg: 5276     median: 5275.5 (4%)     max: 5600 Points
36271 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 6750     avg: 7166     median: 7166 (5%)     max: 7582 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 2573     avg: 2685     median: 2684.5 (3%)     max: 2796 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
914 s (11%)
344.6 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
23.3 s (5%)
9.8 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1456     avg: 1484     median: 1484 (2%)     max: 1512 Points
16497 Points (26%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 38099     avg: 38274     median: 38274 (22%)     max: 38449 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4874     avg: 5279     median: 5279 (63%)     max: 5684 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 11.18     avg: 12.1     median: 12.1 (4%)     max: 12.98 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 65.4     avg: 68.1     median: 68.1 (16%)     max: 70.8 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.56     avg: 10.4     median: 10.4 (18%)     max: 11.3 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.132     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.158 GB/s
0.8 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.202     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (4%)     max: 0.244 GB/s
1.1 GB/s (19%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 1.1     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (3%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
5.8 GB/s (15%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
714 Seconds (9%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 372     avg: 373.5     median: 373.5 (3%)     max: 375 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4926     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (12%)     max: 0.575 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2506     avg: 2525     median: 2525 (5%)     max: 2544 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 23.46     avg: 24.4     median: 24.4 (5%)     max: 25.42 s
7.6 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 63     avg: 64.6     median: 64.6 (3%)     max: 66.1 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1532     avg: 1574     median: 1574 (7%)     max: 1616 s
436.4 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 5498     avg: 5533     median: 5533 (5%)     max: 5568 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1812     avg: 1984     median: 2066 (6%)     max: 2075 Points
min: 10981     avg: 12323     median: 12323 (33%)     max: 13665 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 16380     avg: 17970     median: 18395 (15%)     max: 19136 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1395     avg: 1528     median: 1576 (4%)     max: 1613 Points
min: 9451     avg: 9958     median: 9958 (25%)     max: 10465 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1940     avg: 2129     median: 2193 (4%)     max: 2254 Points
min: 18221     avg: 18284     median: 18283.5 (33%)     max: 18346 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5316     avg: 6022     median: 6021.5 (25%)     max: 6727 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1564     avg: 1644     median: 1644 (69%)     max: 1724 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8610     avg: 8660     median: 8660 (16%)     max: 8710 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1683 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8537 Points (27%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3733     avg: 3869     median: 3868.5 (7%)     max: 4004 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1390     avg: 1449     median: 1449 (28%)     max: 1508 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2728 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2660 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3786 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4812 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3814 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 537     avg: 541     median: 540.5 (1%)     max: 544 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
78273 Points (69%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
251 Points (72%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 279     avg: 285     median: 285 (59%)     max: 291 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1585     avg: 1649     median: 1648.5 (63%)     max: 1712 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 47.3     avg: 53.2     median: 53.2 (9%)     max: 59.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 61.3     avg: 63.1     median: 63.1 (12%)     max: 64.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
4 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 27.5     avg: 27.6     median: 27.6 (21%)     max: 27.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD A10 Pro-7350B → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1270P → 543% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 16:42:46

#0 checking url part for id 5994 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14062 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720104166 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 5994 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 5994 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14062 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#9 got single benchmarks 14062 +0.005s ... 0.024s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.031s ... 0.055s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.057s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)