Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-4810MQ vs Intel Core i9-12900K

Intel Core i7-4810MQ

► remove from comparison Intel 4810MQ

The Intel Core i7-4810MQ is a high-end quad-core processor for laptops which has been launched in Q1/2014. It is based on the Haswell architecture and manufactured in 22nm. Due to Hyperthreading, the four cores can handle up to eight threads in parallel leading to better utilization of the CPU. Each core offers a base speed of 2.8 GHz but can dynamically increase clock rates with Turbo Boost up to 3.6 GHz (for 4 active cores), 3.7 GHz (for 2 active cores) and 3.8 GHz (for 1 active core).

Architecture

Haswell is the successor to the Ivy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm and offer an optimized branch prediction as well as additional execution ports, improving the performance per clock by 5 - 10 percent. Furthermore, new features like AVX2 and FMA should increase the performance in future applications.

Performance

Compared to the Core i7-4800MQ, the 4810MQ is clocked just 100 MHz higher and therefore only slightly faster. Overall, the performance is almost similar to the Core i7-4900MQ. Even extremly demanding software or multitasking will be handled easily.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 4600 offers 20 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 400 MHz up to 1300 MHz with Turbo Boost, making it about 30 % faster than the HD 4000. This is slightly slower than the AMD Radeon HD 8650G, but similar to a dedicated GeForce GT 720M.

Power Consumption

The i7-4810MQ is rated at a TDP of 47 W including graphics card, memory controller and VRMs.  Therefore, the CPU is only suited for laptops 15-inches or greater.

Intel Core i9-12900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900K

The Intel Core i9-12900K is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 24 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 5.2 GHz (Turbo Boost Max 3.0), the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.9 GHz. All cores can use 30 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (most likely only using AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.55 GHz.

Performance

The average 12900K in our database nearly matches the Ryzen 9 3950X and the Ryzen 9 5950X in multi-thread performance. This is a great result, as of mid 2022.

Learn more by reading the Corsair One i300 review.

Power consumption

This Core i9 series chip has a Base power consumption of 125 W, with 241 W being its "Maximum Turbo" power consumption.

The i9-12900K is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower than average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-4810MQIntel Core i9-12900K
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Alder Lake-S
CodenameHaswellAlder Lake
Series: Alder Lake-S Alder Lake
Intel Core i7-4940MX compare3.1 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4930MX compare3 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4980HQ compare2.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4910MQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4900MQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4960HQ compare2.6 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4810MQ « 2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4870HQ compare2.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4800MQ compare2.7 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4950HQ compare2.4 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4860HQ compare2.4 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4720HQ compare2.6 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4850HQ compare2.3 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4710HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4710MQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4770HQ compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4700HQ compare2.4 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4700MQ compare2.4 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4760HQ compare2.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4722HQ compare2.4 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4712HQ compare2.3 - 3.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4712MQ compare2.3 - 3.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4750HQ compare2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4702HQ compare2.2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4702MQ compare2.2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4610M compare3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4600M compare2.9 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4578U compare3 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4558U compare2.8 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4600U compare2.1 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4650U compare1.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4510U compare2 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4500U compare1.8 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4550U compare1.5 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4610Y compare1.7 - 2.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900K « 3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock2800 - 3800 MHz3200 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB1.4 MB
L2 Cache1 MB14 MB
L3 Cache6 MB30 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 816 / 24
TDP47 Watt125 Watt
Transistors1400 Million
Technology22 nm10 nm
Die Size177 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketrPGALGA1700
FeaturesHD Graphics 4600 (400 - 1300 MHz), DDR3(L)-1600 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro, AES-NIDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 5, Thread Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterprise, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 4600 (400 - 1300 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$378 U.S.$589 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900K
50.7 pt (70%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 25245     avg: 26125     median: 26125 (24%)     max: 27005 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1998     avg: 2005     median: 2004.5 (85%)     max: 2011 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 766     avg: 772     median: 771.5 (86%)     max: 777 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 9630     avg: 9935     median: 9935 (24%)     max: 10240 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 623     avg: 650     median: 647 (4%)     max: 696 Points
min: 3473     avg: 3877     median: 4057 (26%)     max: 4102 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 145     avg: 147.6     median: 148 (45%)     max: 151 Points
min: 286     avg: 289     median: 289 (87%)     max: 292 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 6.66     avg: 7     median: 7 (9%)     max: 7.5 Points
min: 44.18     avg: 45.6     median: 45.6 (59%)     max: 47.06 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.64     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (42%)     max: 1.68 Points
min: 3.49     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (87%)     max: 3.5 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5430     avg: 5445     median: 5445 (33%)     max: 5460 Points
min: 9812     avg: 9859     median: 9859 (60%)     max: 9906 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 18564     avg: 19148     median: 19147.5 (14%)     max: 19731 Points
min: 70420     avg: 71819     median: 71819 (52%)     max: 73218 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 23921     avg: 24926     median: 24926 (17%)     max: 25931 Points
min: 112749     avg: 112821     median: 112821 (78%)     max: 112893 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 6954     avg: 7059     median: 7058.5 (9%)     max: 7163 Points
min: 16144     avg: 16271     median: 16270.5 (20%)     max: 16397 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 270     avg: 326.2     median: 326.2 (4%)     max: 382.3 s
min: 190.6     avg: 192.8     median: 192.8 (2%)     max: 195 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 7.64     avg: 9.9     median: 9.9 (2%)     max: 12.22 s
min: 2.398     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (1%)     max: 4.924 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 3054     avg: 3467     median: 3466.5 (5%)     max: 3879 Points
min: 10792     avg: 11834     median: 11834 (19%)     max: 12876 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 96960     avg: 97316     median: 97315.5 (56%)     max: 97671 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6571     avg: 6576     median: 6575.5 (79%)     max: 6580 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
38.3 fps (13%)
min: 196     avg: 201     median: 201 (70%)     max: 206 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
146 fps (34%)
min: 365     avg: 366.8     median: 366.8 (85%)     max: 368.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 29     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (52%)     max: 30 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (0%)
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2 (0%)     max: 2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.6 GB/s (10%)
min: 3.5     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (62%)     max: 3.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.7 GB/s (10%)
min: 18.5     avg: 19.3     median: 19.3 (50%)     max: 20 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 121.1     avg: 124.7     median: 124.7 (1%)     max: 128.3 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3946     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4216 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
7049 Points (15%)
min: 18426     avg: 18753     median: 18752.5 (40%)     max: 19079 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 9.86     avg: 10.9     median: 10.9 (2%)     max: 12 s
min: 7.04     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.063 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 22.26     avg: 22.6     median: 22.6 (1%)     max: 23 s
min: 15.59     avg: 15.6     median: 15.6 (1%)     max: 15.67 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 522     avg: 547     median: 546.5 (2%)     max: 571 s
min: 338.6     avg: 347     median: 347 (2%)     max: 355.4 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 4810MQ +
min: 107890     avg: 126580     median: 126580 (60%)     max: 145270 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 4810MQ +
min: 79690     avg: 79945     median: 79945 (61%)     max: 80200 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 4810MQ +
min: 7.6     avg: 7.7     median: 7.7 (98%)     max: 7.7 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 22292     avg: 23470     median: 23348 (20%)     max: 24893 Points
min: 97859     avg: 97907     median: 97907 (86%)     max: 97955 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7507     avg: 8043     median: 8012 (22%)     max: 8498 Points
min: 23010     avg: 25787     median: 26223 (71%)     max: 28789 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 42114     avg: 45670     median: 46717 (38%)     max: 48857 Points
min: 81757     avg: 101311     median: 101311 (82%)     max: 120865 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 78981     avg: 99892     median: 99891.5 (81%)     max: 120802 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 80654     avg: 99678     median: 99678 (84%)     max: 118702 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 6064     avg: 6572     median: 6426 (16%)     max: 7231 Points
min: 25449     avg: 25582     median: 25581.5 (65%)     max: 25714 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 8331     avg: 9150     median: 9175 (16%)     max: 10087 Points
min: 39112     avg: 39903     median: 39903 (71%)     max: 40694 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 18431     avg: 18556     median: 18555.5 (78%)     max: 18680 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1969     avg: 2006     median: 2005.5 (85%)     max: 2042 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17698     avg: 17776     median: 17776 (32%)     max: 17854 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1927     avg: 1948     median: 1947.5 (8%)     max: 1968 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17697     avg: 17828     median: 17828 (56%)     max: 17959 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8593     avg: 8629     median: 8629 (86%)     max: 8665 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 63583     avg: 63911     median: 63910.5 (70%)     max: 64238 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 4810MQ +
11663 Points (21%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 4810MQ +
3506 Points (68%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 4810MQ +
min: 8714     avg: 8744     median: 8744 (71%)     max: 8774 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 4810MQ +
min: 8038     avg: 8083     median: 8082.5 (73%)     max: 8127 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 4810MQ +
min: 12740     avg: 13182     median: 13181.5 (26%)     max: 13623 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 4810MQ +
min: 11277     avg: 11803     median: 11803 (24%)     max: 12329 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 4810MQ +
min: 10908     avg: 11235     median: 11235 (29%)     max: 11562 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 475     avg: 478     median: 478 (1%)     max: 481 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
96769 Points (85%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 320     avg: 325     median: 325 (68%)     max: 330 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2308 Points (88%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 257     avg: 268.3     median: 268.3 (46%)     max: 279.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 265     avg: 294.7     median: 294.7 (54%)     max: 324.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
56.1 Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 12.5     avg: 12.8     median: 12.8 (10%)     max: 13.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-4810MQ → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900K → 334% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 19:37:05

#0 checking url part for id 5001 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13851 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720114625 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 5001 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#7 got single benchmarks 5001 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13851 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 13851 +0.009s ... 0.02s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.039s ... 0.059s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.061s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)