Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-460M vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 vs Intel Core i5-430M

Intel Core i5-460M

► remove from comparison Intel 460M

The Intel Core i5-460M is a high end dual core CPU for laptops and clocks (due to the Turbo Mode) from 2.53 to 2.8 GHz. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the Core i5-540M, the 460M does not support AES, VT-d and Trusted Execution functions and features a slower Turbo Boost (2.8 versus 3.06 GHz).

A feature of the new Core i5-460M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the Core i5-460M is on average faster than a 2.8 GHz Core 2 Duo T9800 and in some benchmarks even faster than the fastest Core 2 Duo T9900 (e.g. 3DMark 06 CPU Score). Therefore, the Core i5-460M is a high end dual core cpu which should handle all daily work and gaming tasks. Only the quad core i7 CPUs can be noticeably faster at tasks that require four or more threads (e.g. rendering).

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-766 MHz and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). According to rumors, the GMA core will also use the Turbo Mode regulate the clock speed.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone). Due to the Turbo Boost, the Core i5 is likely to use the whole TDP of 35 Watt under load and therefore can use more power than a similar specified Core 2 Duo. In Idle mode, the i5 uses clearly less power than the Core 2 Duo CPUs.

Intel Core 2 Duo T6600

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 is an entry to mid-range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn architecture, but features only 2 MB level 2 cache and a mediocre clock rate of 2.2 GHz. Compared to the similar T6670, the T6600 does not feature Virtualization features in hardware and is speced at a lower maximum temperature.

The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6600.

Intel Core i5-430M

► remove from comparison Intel 430M

The Intel Core i5-430M is a fast middle class dual core CPU for laptops and clocks (due to the Turbo Mode) from 2.26 to 2.53 GHz. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the faster Core i7-620M, the 430M only has 3 MB Level 3 Cache, missing VT-d, Trusted Execution, and AES features and a lower clock speed.

A feature of the new Core i5-430M is the integrated graphics card (called Intel HD Graphics) and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

Due to the integrated memory controller, the HyperThreading and Turbo Boost, the  Core i5-430M is faster than a similar clocked Core 2 Duo in all (us known) applications and benchmarks. In fact, the 430M even came close to a fast Core 2 Duo T9600 (2.8 GHz) in some benchmarks (e.g. Cinebench 10 Multi Threaded). This means the 430M is a fast middle class - performance CPU and much faster than the top AMD model, the Turion II Ultra M660 (at the time of announcement).

The 32nm cpu cores of the Westmere generation can also process some new instructions to accelerate AES encryptions. Still, these functions are deactivated on the Core i5-430M leading to some performance drawbacks in modern applications that support AES encoding using the new instructions (e.g. the Communications Suite test in the PCMark Vantage boosts up to 70% using AES in the faster Core i5-520M).

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is between 500-766 MHz (Turbo Boost) and is clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). The Turbo Boost can overclock the Intel HD Graphics up to 733 MHz when the cores are not fully used.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone).

ModelIntel Core i5-460MIntel Core 2 Duo T6600Intel Core i5-430M
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Core 2 DuoIntel Core i5
CodenameArrandalePenrynArrandale
Series: Core i5 Arrandale
Intel Core i5-580M2.67 - 3.33 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560M2.67 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-480M2.67 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540M2.53 - 3.07 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-460M « 2.53 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520M2.4 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-450M2.4 - 2.66 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430M2.26 - 2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560UM1.33 - 2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-470UM1.33 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540UM1.2 - 2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520UM1.06 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430UM1.2 - 1.73 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 « 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i5-580M2.67 - 3.33 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560M2.67 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-480M2.67 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540M2.53 - 3.07 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-460M2.53 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520M2.4 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-450M2.4 - 2.66 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430M « 2.26 - 2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560UM1.33 - 2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-470UM1.33 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540UM1.2 - 2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520UM1.06 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430UM1.2 - 1.73 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Clock2530 - 2800 MHz2200 MHz2260 - 2533 MHz
FSB24008002500
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB512 KB
L3 Cache3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 22 / 4
TDP35 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors382+177 Million410 Million177 Million
Technology32 nm45 nm, 1.00-1.25V32 nm
Die Size81+114 mm2107 mm2144 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1288, PGA988PGA478BGA1288, PGA988
Featuresintegrated DDR3 memory controller, GMA HD Graphics, MMX, SSE (1,2,3,3S, 4.1, 3.2), EM64T, VT-xIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit, SSE4.1Turbo Boost, Hyper Threading, Enhanced Speedstep, integrierte GMA HD 500-733MHz, SSE4.1, SSE4.2
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 460M +
min: 1.7     avg: 2.2     median: 2.3 (3%)     max: 2.48 Points
90%
1 430M +
min: 1.56     avg: 2     median: 2 (3%)     max: 2.09 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
460M +
min: 2971     avg: 3106     median: 3080 (19%)     max: 3491 Points
min: 2308     avg: 2391     median: 2355 (14%)     max: 2631 Points
min: 2573     avg: 2736     median: 2748 (17%)     max: 2953 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
460M +
min: 6634     avg: 7073     median: 7085 (5%)     max: 7898 Points
min: 4335     avg: 4525     median: 4472 (3%)     max: 4833 Points
min: 5073     avg: 6300     median: 6357 (5%)     max: 6591 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
460M +
min: 8060     avg: 8437     median: 8468 (6%)     max: 9160 Points
min: 4229     avg: 4727     median: 4864.5 (3%)     max: 4948 Points
min: 5917     avg: 7558     median: 7717.5 (5%)     max: 7937 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
460M +
min: 3569     avg: 3807     median: 3818.5 (5%)     max: 4034 Points
min: 2257     avg: 2454     median: 2463 (3%)     max: 2633 Points
min: 2954     avg: 3350     median: 3372 (4%)     max: 3454 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
460M +
min: 515     avg: 596     median: 575 (7%)     max: 837 s
min: 1190     avg: 2015     median: 2269 (27%)     max: 2331 s
min: 407.4     avg: 727     median: 642 (8%)     max: 1602 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
460M +
min: 16.7     avg: 19.4     median: 18.6 (4%)     max: 27 s
min: 37     avg: 63.1     median: 71.1 (14%)     max: 73.3 s
100%
430M +
min: 12.68     avg: 23.5     median: 20.7 (4%)     max: 54 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
460M +
min: 2770     avg: 2938     median: 2945 (6%)     max: 3142 Points
min: 1852     avg: 1942     median: 1947 (4%)     max: 1989 Points
min: 2330     avg: 2568     median: 2584 (5%)     max: 2654 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
460M +
min: 14.09     avg: 16     median: 16 (3%)     max: 18 s
min: 22     avg: 23     median: 23 (5%)     max: 24 s
100%
430M +
min: 16     avg: 17.5     median: 17.7 (4%)     max: 18 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
460M +
min: 33.03     avg: 37.3     median: 37 (2%)     max: 42.6 s
min: 54     avg: 59     median: 60.5 (3%)     max: 61 s
100%
430M +
min: 38     avg: 41.4     median: 41.3 (2%)     max: 43.85 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
460M +
min: 782     avg: 918     median: 880 (4%)     max: 1521 s
min: 1322     avg: 1334     median: 1334.5 (6%)     max: 1343 s
100%
430M +
min: 900     avg: 962     median: 962 (4%)     max: 1034 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
460M +
38480 MIPS (18%)
min: 20109     avg: 20199     median: 20216 (10%)     max: 20254 MIPS
min: 27890     avg: 29299     median: 28910 (14%)     max: 31740 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
460M +
28160 MFLOPS (22%)
min: 14760     avg: 15060     median: 15119.5 (12%)     max: 15241 MFLOPS
min: 22500     avg: 23713     median: 23820 (18%)     max: 26530 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
460M +
min: 5942     avg: 6910     median: 6880 (14%)     max: 7682 Points
min: 3511     avg: 4691     median: 4746.5 (10%)     max: 5758 Points
min: 5506     avg: 6342     median: 6525.5 (13%)     max: 6809 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
460M +
min: 6.8     avg: 6.9     median: 6.9 (88%)     max: 6.9 Points
min: 5.6     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (73%)     max: 5.7 Points
min: 6.3     avg: 6.6     median: 6.7 (86%)     max: 6.7 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
460M +
min: 6382     avg: 7659     median: 7826 (7%)     max: 7985 Points
min: 4198     avg: 4217     median: 4216.5 (4%)     max: 4235 Points
min: 6803     avg: 7160     median: 7189.5 (6%)     max: 7366 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 460M +
min: 2402     avg: 2583     median: 2587 (7%)     max: 2756 Points
100%
1 430M +
2594 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 430M +
27418 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 430M +
2190 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 430M +
3173 Points (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-460M → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 → 73% n=15

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-430M → 92% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 01. 20:08:51

#0 checking url part for id 1214 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 485 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 535 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719857328 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1214 +0s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 1214 +0.005s ... 0.009s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 485 +0s ... 0.01s

#10 got single benchmarks 485 +0.002s ... 0.012s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 535 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#12 got single benchmarks 535 +0.042s ... 0.054s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.054s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.076s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.076s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)