Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-380M vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U vs Intel Core i3-380UM

Intel Core i3-380M

► remove from comparison Intel 380M

The Intel Core i3-380M is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops and clocks with 2.53 GHz. The difference to the Core i5 and i7 series is the lacking TurboBoost overclocking, and the missing AES, VT-d and Trusted Execution functions. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). It is part of the Arrandale refresh and successor to the 2.4 GHz i3-370M.

A feature of the new Core i3-380M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and the memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the Core i3-380M should be at a level of a 2.6-2.7 GHz Core 2 Duo (upper class CPUs in the last year). This is mainly due to the efficient HyperThreading function and the integrated memory controller. In single threaded applications it should be at least as fast, as a similar clocked Core 2 Duo.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-667 MHz (due to Turbo Boost) and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. The Core i5 and i7 models should still be a bit faster because of the higher max. clock speed of the GPU. The performance of the graphics in 3D should be on par with a Radeon HD 4200 but the driver support is usually worse.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone).

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 PRO 3500U

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is a mobile SoC for business laptops that was announced in April  2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.7 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics card with 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 5 3500U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 5 3500U should be ahead the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz) and nearly on par with the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U (2.2 - 3.8 GHz).

Intel Core i3-380UM

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i3-380UM is a Ultra Low Voltage dual-core processor for small and light laptops. It is clocked with 1.3 GHz and does not feature Turbo Boost to overclock the CPU cores. Another feature missing compared to the i5 and i7 lineup is the AES function block. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). 

The similar Core i5-470UM, i5-560UM, and i7-660UM are also clocked at a base speed of 1.3 GHz, but feature Turbo Boost and are therefore faster.

A feature of the new Core i3-380UM is the integrated graphics card (called Intel HD Graphics) and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process. The also called GMA HD is able to use Turbo Boost to overclock from 133 to 500 MHz.

Due to the integrated memory controller and HyperThreading, the  Core i3-380UM is faster than a similar clocked Core 2 Duo (1.3 GHz) in all (us known) applications and benchmarks. Therefore it beats the 1.3 GHz Pentium SU7300 and performs in some areas even as fast as a 2 GHz Core 2 Duo. Still the gaming performance can suffer from the low clock speed.

The power consumption of 18 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 17 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo SL-series (CPU alone).

ModelIntel Core i3-380MAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500UIntel Core i3-380UM
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)Intel Core i3
CodenameArrandaleZen+Arrandale
Series: Core i3 Arrandale
Intel Core i3-390M2.67 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-380M « 2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-370M2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-350M2.26 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-330M2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-380UM1.33 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-330UM1.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U « 2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-390M2.67 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-380M2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-370M2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-350M2.26 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-330M2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-380UM « 1.33 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-330UM1.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Clock2533 MHz2100 - 3700 MHz1333 MHz
FSB25002500
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB512 KB
L3 Cache3 MB4 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 82 / 4
TDP35 Watt15 Watt18 Watt
Transistors382+177 Million4500 Million382+177 Million
Technology32 nm12 nm32 nm
Die Size81+114 mm281+114 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA1288, PGA988AM4BGA1288
FeaturesHyper Threading, Enhanced Speedstep, integrierte GMA HD 500-667MHz,XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel HD Graphics 166-500MHz, DDR3-800 Memory Controller (max 8GB), Hyper-Threading, Virtualization Technology VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Fast Memory Access, Flex Memory Access, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache384 KB
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 PRO 3500U
26.2 pt (36%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 354     avg: 361.5     median: 361.5 (40%)     max: 369 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1328     avg: 1339     median: 1338.5 (3%)     max: 1349 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 611     avg: 624     median: 624 (4%)     max: 637 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 140     avg: 142     median: 142 (43%)     max: 144 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 380M +
min: 2.07     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (3%)     max: 2.2 Points
53%
1 380UM +
min: 0.99     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (1%)     max: 1.11 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 380M +
min: 2719     avg: 2788     median: 2808 (17%)     max: 2830 Points
53%
1 380UM +
min: 1268     avg: 1451     median: 1502 (9%)     max: 1530 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 380M +
min: 6512     avg: 6558     median: 6554 (5%)     max: 6602 Points
53%
1 380UM +
min: 3052     avg: 3385     median: 3471 (3%)     max: 3546 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 380M +
min: 7602     avg: 7797     median: 7810.5 (5%)     max: 7966 Points
53%
1 380UM +
min: 3729     avg: 4054     median: 4166 (3%)     max: 4266 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 380M +
min: 3349     avg: 3434     median: 3457.5 (4%)     max: 3472 Points
53%
1 380UM +
min: 1499     avg: 1733     median: 1845 (2%)     max: 1856 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 380M +
min: 620     avg: 621     median: 621 (7%)     max: 623 s
92%
1 380UM +
min: 1178     avg: 1687     median: 1264.5 (15%)     max: 3039 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 380M +
min: 19.7     avg: 20.1     median: 20 (4%)     max: 20.5 s
96%
1 380UM +
min: 38.2     avg: 53.6     median: 40.5 (8%)     max: 95 s
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 15910     avg: 16221     median: 16220.5 (9%)     max: 16531 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3432     avg: 3474     median: 3474 (42%)     max: 3516 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.36     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (6%)     max: 3.6 fps
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 786     avg: 796     median: 795.5 (6%)     max: 805 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.8 sec (17%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 380M +
min: 2671     avg: 2697     median: 2699 (6%)     max: 2731 Points
54%
1 380UM +
min: 1314     avg: 1426     median: 1463 (3%)     max: 1464 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 380M +
min: 14     avg: 16.5     median: 17.3 (4%)     max: 17.5 s
97%
1 380UM +
min: 31.92     avg: 32     median: 32 (7%)     max: 32 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 380M +
min: 41     avg: 42.2     median: 41.8 (2%)     max: 44.3 s
99%
1 380UM +
min: 72     avg: 72.9     median: 72.9 (3%)     max: 73.6 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 380M +
min: 947     avg: 954     median: 951 (4%)     max: 964 s
97%
1 380UM +
min: 1676     avg: 1719     median: 1695 (8%)     max: 1786 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 380M +
31000 MIPS (15%)
58%
1 380UM +
min: 16560     avg: 18035     median: 18035 (9%)     max: 19510 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 380M +
min: 26160     avg: 26285     median: 26285 (20%)     max: 26410 MFLOPS
54%
1 380UM +
min: 13800     avg: 14325     median: 14325 (11%)     max: 14850 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 380M +
6.8 Points (87%)
71%
1 380UM +
min: 4.5     avg: 4.7     median: 4.8 (62%)     max: 4.8 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 380M +
min: 7240     avg: 7262     median: 7246 (6%)     max: 7300 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 380M +
min: 2073     avg: 2338     median: 2391.5 (6%)     max: 2497 Points
min: 5150     avg: 5781     median: 5781 (16%)     max: 6412 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
43514 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5629     avg: 5860     median: 5859.5 (15%)     max: 6090 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 8547     avg: 8809     median: 8808.5 (16%)     max: 9070 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2595     avg: 2638     median: 2638 (11%)     max: 2681 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
863 Points (36%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2824 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3820 Points (38%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10419 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1097     avg: 1211     median: 1211 (1%)     max: 1325 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 27185     avg: 27437     median: 27437 (24%)     max: 27689 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
142 Points (30%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-380M → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-380UM → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 03. 19:16:32

#0 checking url part for id 1264 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11334 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1232 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720026992 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1264 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 1264 +0.016s ... 0.024s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11334 +0.004s ... 0.028s

#10 got single benchmarks 11334 +0.004s ... 0.032s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 1232 +0.001s ... 0.033s

#12 got single benchmarks 1232 +0.007s ... 0.04s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.04s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.024s ... 0.064s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.064s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)