Notebookcheck Logo

XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) review: A compact RTX 4070 laptop for gamers and creators

Powerhouse. The lightweight, compact XMG Fusion 15 doesn't feature a conventional screen size: Instead of a 16-inch or 15.6-inch display, it is fitted with a 15.3-inch panel (2,560 x 1,600 pixels, 240 Hz) with a 16:10 aspect ratio. A Core i9 processor, RTX 4070, Thunderbolt 4 and very good runtimes round out its total package.

The XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)—a 15.3-inch laptop for gamers and creators—is based on a barebone (GM5IX7A) from the manufacturer Tongfang. Raptor Lake, Ada Lovelace and 32 GB RAM equip the laptop for streaming, rendering and gaming. The present variant can be purchased for around US$2,500. Competitors include devices such as the Aorus 16X (2024), Alienware m16 R2, HP Omen Transcend 16 and the Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9.

SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (XMG Fusion 15 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 170 W PL2 / Short Burst, 160 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2175 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.5222, Optimus + MUX-Switch
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5-5600, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Display
15.30 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 197 PPI, BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1, IPS, sRGB, glossy: no, 240 Hz, Adaptive Sync
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 894 GB free
Soundcard
Conexant SN6140
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Audiokombo, Card Reader: SD, SDXC, SDHC, TPM 2.0
Networking
Motorcomm YT6801 (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 21.9 x 342.5 x 245 ( = 0.86 x 13.48 x 9.65 in)
Battery
99.8 Wh, 6450 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, USB Thundrive (drivers, manuals), stickers, mousepad, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.13 kg ( = 75.13 oz / 4.7 pounds), Power Supply: 864 g ( = 30.48 oz / 1.9 pounds)
Price
2293 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors compared

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.9 %
05/2024
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg21.9 mm15.30"2560x1600
87.4 %
04/2024
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
90.2 %
03/2024
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg23.5 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.4 %
02/2024
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
89.3 %
03/2024
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.95 mm16.00"2560x1600

Case - The XMG laptop with an aluminum case

Schenker has gone for a sleek, matte black aluminium case with smooth surfaces. The laptop doesn't feature any eye-catching design elements or LED strips—only its keyboard backlighting (RGB) gives the device a bit of color. The laptop would barely stick out in professional environments. 

We noted no material protrusions and all the gaps line up perfectly. The base unit and lid can be twisted ever so slightly, but this is nothing out of the ordinary. Pressing onto the back of the lid doesn't result in any picture changes. The stiff hinges allow a maximum opening angle of 180 degrees. It is possible to open it with one hand.

XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)

No surprise: Within the comparison field, the Fusion is the most compact device—it features the smallest display. At the same time, it is also the most lightweight of them all.

Size comparison

363.4 mm / 14.3 inch 261.75 mm / 10.3 inch 26.95 mm / 1.061 inch 2.5 kg5.42 lbs363.9 mm / 14.3 inch 249.4 mm / 9.82 inch 23.5 mm / 0.925 inch 2.5 kg5.44 lbs356 mm / 14 inch 254 mm / 10 inch 20 mm / 0.787 inch 2.3 kg5.14 lbs356 mm / 14 inch 269 mm / 10.6 inch 20 mm / 0.787 inch 2.3 kg5.04 lbs342.5 mm / 13.5 inch 245 mm / 9.65 inch 21.9 mm / 0.862 inch 2.1 kg4.7 lbs297 mm / 11.7 inch 210 mm / 8.27 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Connectivity - The Fusion 15 with Thunderbolt 4

The Fusion features three USB-A ports (USB 3.2 Gen 1) and two USB-C ports (1x USB 3.2 Gen 1, 1x Thunderbolt 4). The TB4 port supports Power Delivery and can output a DisplayPort signal. In total, the laptop has two video outputs (1x HDMI, 1x DP). An audio jack and a Gigabit Ethernet port round out its connectivity options. Its video outputs and power connection are located on the back of the device. Corresponding cables would run out the back, so they would not get in your way.

Left side: Slot for a cable lock, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C), audio combo
Left side: Slot for a cable lock, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C), audio combo
Right side: SD card reader, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
Right side: SD card reader, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
Back: Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery), HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, power connection
Back: Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery), HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, power connection

SD card reader

With transfer rates of 81 MB/s (transferring 250 jpg images, each 5 MB in size) and 82 MB/s (copying large data blocks), the SD card reader (reference card: AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) is of average speed. The competition largely offers faster readers.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
186 MB/s +130%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=97, last 2 years)
97.6 MB/s +20%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
81 MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
75.3 MB/s -7%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
205.32 MB/s +150%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
188 MB/s +129%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=92, last 2 years)
120.5 MB/s +47%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
82 MB/s

Communication

The Fusion uses a WiFi 6E chip (Intel AX211) which, in the best-case scenario (no WiFi devices in close vicinity, short distance between laptop and server), reaches very good data rates. Wired connections are taken care of by a Gigabit Ethernet controller (YT6801) from Motorcomm—a manufacturer which we have not encountered before.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1444 (1378min - 1489max) MBit/s
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1411 (1327min - 1472max) MBit/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1793, n=150, last 2 years)
1266 MBit/s -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1861, n=189)
1244 MBit/s -14%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202
1205 (875min - 1438max) MBit/s -17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
636 (485min - 769max) MBit/s -56%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
469 (304min - 548max) MBit/s -68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1697 (849min - 1712max) MBit/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1632 (1454min - 1700max) MBit/s
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1577 (1237min - 1665max) MBit/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=156, last 2 years)
1399 MBit/s -14%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=189)
1394 MBit/s -15%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202
1227 (1074min - 1317max) MBit/s -25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1040 (739min - 1218max) MBit/s -36%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1631 (1454-1700)
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1576 (1237-1665)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1227 (1074-1317)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1668 (849-1712)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1039 (739-1218)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1444 (1378-1489)
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø469 (304-548)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1205 (875-1438)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1411 (1327-1472)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø636 (485-769)

Webcam

Its webcam (2.1 MP) is of average quality. It fails when it comes to color accuracy: With a deviation of about 9, the target value (DeltaE<3) has been missed. It does, however, support Windows Hello. Furthermore, it is fitted with a mechanical cover.

ColorChecker
8.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
11 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24): 8.97 ∆E min: 2.36 - max: 15.16 ∆E

Accessories

The laptop comes delivered with a USB stick (driver, manuals), stickers and a mousepad.

Maintenance

After removing all of the screws on the bottom of the device, the bottom case part can be taken off quite easily—you may just need a plectrum or a flat spatula to assist in this. Subsequently, you can access the RAM banks (both occupied), SSD (PCIe 4, M.2-2280), second SSD slot (PCIe 4, M.2-2280), WLAN module, fans, BIOS battery and the laptop's battery.

Hardware XMG Fusion 15 (Early 2024)
Hardware XMG Fusion 15 (Early 2024)
Hardware XMG Fusion 15 (Early 2024)
Hardware XMG Fusion 15 (Early 2024)
Hardware XMG Fusion 15 (Early 2024)

Warranty

The device is covered by a base warranty lasting for two years—this includes pickup service and a 6-month quick repair service (repair within 48 hours). You can extend this warranty to 36 months for a fee.

Input devices - Single-key RGB backlighting

Keyboard

The chiclet keyboard's keys (four-level RGB backlighting) feature a medium lift and a clear pressure point. Their resistance could be a little more crisp—but this is a matter of taste. The keyboard yields minimally when typing, but didn't prove to be annoying during our test. Positive: The four arrow keys are not only fully sized but they are also separated from the other keys.

Touchpad

A multi-touch clickpad (approx. 12.3 x 7.8 cm) replaces the need for a mouse and its smooth surface makes it easy for fingers to glide over. It features a short lift and a clear pressure point.

Keyboard XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Keyboard XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)

Display - Bright panel with sRGB coverage

Schenker has equipped the Fusion with a 15.3-inch screen (2,560 x 1,600 pixels) with an aspect ratio of 16:10. The matte 240-Hz panel boasts Adaptive Sync, no PWM flickering, short response times and great brightness. Alternative displays are not available.

Sub-pixel array
Sub-pixel array
No visible backlight bleeding
No visible backlight bleeding
467
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
437
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 491 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 460 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 491 cd/m²
Contrast: 1045:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.14
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
75% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
73.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.204
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 15.30
Aorus 16X 2024
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Alienware m16 R2
BOE NE16NYH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4), OLED, 2560x1600, 16.00
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
BOE NE160QDM-NYC, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display
-7%
-3%
22%
-5%
Display P3 Coverage
73.5
67.2
-9%
71
-3%
99.8
36%
69.3
-6%
sRGB Coverage
100
96.7
-3%
100
0%
100
0%
99.4
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
75
69.3
-8%
71.4
-5%
97
29%
70.1
-7%
Response Times
-27%
-41%
96%
-105%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
5 ?(2.3, 2.7)
7.5 ?(3.3, 4.2)
-50%
5.7 ?(2.6, 3.1)
-14%
0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)
96%
11.9 ?(5.5, 6.4)
-138%
Response Time Black / White *
5.2 ?(1.5, 3.7)
5.4 ?(1.5, 3.9)
-4%
8.7 ?(4.6, 4.1)
-67%
0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)
96%
8.9 ?(4.8, 4.1)
-71%
PWM Frequency
120 ?(100)
Screen
-1%
11%
182%
17%
Brightness middle
491
542
10%
345.8
-30%
390
-21%
384
-22%
Brightness
460
504
10%
337
-27%
392
-15%
366
-20%
Brightness Distribution
89
86
-3%
87
-2%
98
10%
91
2%
Black Level *
0.47
0.45
4%
0.3
36%
0.02
96%
0.35
26%
Contrast
1045
1204
15%
1153
10%
19500
1766%
1097
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.16
2.73
-26%
1.99
8%
1.94
10%
0.97
55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.44
5.29
-19%
3.52
21%
4.26
4%
3.57
20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.14
1.32
-16%
0.62
46%
4.21
-269%
0.77
32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.3
2.9
12%
2.1
36%
1.5
55%
1.5
55%
Gamma
2.204 100%
2.192 100%
2.32 95%
2.221 99%
2.24 98%
CCT
6286 103%
6173 105%
6369 102%
6395 102%
6709 97%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-12% / -6%
-11% / 1%
100% / 135%
-31% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

The display already showed good color depiction straight out of the box: With a deviation of around 2.2, the target value (DeltaE < 3) has been reached. Calibrating the display lowers its deviation to 1.14 and results in more balanced gray tones. The panel is able to cover the sRGB color space completely but not the color spaces AdobeRGB or DCI P3. This isn't any different on most of its competitors' screens.

CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Color saturation
CalMAN: Color saturation
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: Color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
XMG Fusion 15 E24 vs sRGB
XMG Fusion 15 E24 vs sRGB
XMG Fusion 15 E24 vs AdobeRGB
XMG Fusion 15 E24 vs AdobeRGB
XMG Fusion 15 E24 vs DCI-P3
XMG Fusion 15 E24 vs DCI-P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
5.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.5 ms rise
↘ 3.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.3 ms rise
↘ 2.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17803 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The device's viewing-angle stable IPS panel remains legible from every angle. Outside, you can read from the display as long as the sun isn't shining too brightly. 

The Fusion outside.
The Fusion outside.
The Fusion 15 (Early 24)'s viewing angles
The Fusion 15 (Early 24)'s viewing angles

Performance - Raptor Lake and Ada Lovelace power the laptop

The powerful, compact XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) is directed toward gamers and creators. Raptor Lake and Ada Lovelace deliver the necessary performance. The laptop can be individually configured via the Schenker online shop. The present variant costs about US$2,500. Cheaper models start from approx. US$1,700.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Nvidia System info
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 

Testing conditions

The laptop offers three manufacturer-specific performance modes (see table), which can be quickly switched between using a separate button (next to the power button). Individual profiles can be created using the pre-installed Control Center software. For example, the power limits of the CPU, the TGP of the GPU and/or the device's upper temperature limits can be adjusted.

The modes Enthusiast (benchmarks) and Balanced (battery tests) were used during our test. The GPU mode was set to Hybrid (= Optimus).

Enthusiast Overboost Balanced
Power Limit 1 (HWInfo) 160 watts 160 watts 160 watts
Power Limit 2 (HWInfo) 170 watts 170 watts 170 watts
Noise (Witcher 3) 51 dB(A) 53 dB(A) 39 dB(A)
Performance (Witcher 3) 128 fps 130 fps 14-128 fps
Control Center
Control Center
Control Center
Control Center
Control Center
Control Center
Control Center
Control Center
Control Center
Control Center
Control Center
Control Center
Control Center
Control Center
Control Center

Undervolting

The processor can be operated with lower voltages than intended by the manufacturer (undervolting). As a result, the device's power consumption and heat emissions are reduced. But be careful: Lowering the voltage too much can lead to an unstable or faulty system. In this case, the changes must be reversed—undervolting must be undertaken at your own risk.

BIOS XMG Fusion 15
BIOS XMG Fusion 15
BIOS XMG Fusion 15
BIOS XMG Fusion 15

Processor

The Core i9-14900HX (Raptor Lake)'s 24 CPU cores (8P + 16E = 32 threads) achieve maximum clock rates of 5.8 GHz (P) and 4.1 GHz (E). Permanent multi-thread load (CB15 Loop) results in stable clock rates—the level depends on the selected power mode.

Enthusiast delivers benchmark values below the CPU average, whereas Overboost raises them significantly above the average—this primarily applies to the laptop's multi-thread performance. Its single-thread performance ranges on a high and very similar level when using all three profiles.

More information about the Core i9 can be found in our analysis article.

Multi-thread (connected to mains)
Multi-thread (connected to mains)
Single-thread (connected to mains)
Single-thread (connected to mains)

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0230460690920115013801610184020702300253027602990322034503680391041404370Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3246 (3155.57-3458.12)
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3877 (3701.99-4280.82)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2777 (2743.86-2839.9)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø2840 (2582.31-3904.72)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4230 (4151.1-4590.84)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX; Overboost: Ø4247 (4169.27-4354.93)
CB15 Loop (Enthusiast)
CB15 Loop (Enthusiast)
CB15 Loop (Overboost)
CB15 Loop (Overboost)
CB15 Loop (Balanced)
CB15 Loop (Balanced)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
87.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
83.3 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
82.4 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
82.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
75.2 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
71.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
61.6 pt
Alienware m16 R2 -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
60.2 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
30709 Points +33%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
29686 (26317.7min - 29686max) Points +28%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (20702 - 32996, n=23)
28967 Points +25%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
27818 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
23124 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
20702 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=223, last 2 years)
19900 Points -14%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
18419 (18019.3min - 18419.5max) Points -20%
Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
2211 Points +8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2188 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2182 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2043 - 2235, n=23)
2175 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2122 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2043 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=221, last 2 years)
1824 Points -11%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1749 Points -14%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
11673 Points +38%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
11319 Points +34%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8427 - 12419, n=23)
11018 Points +30%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
10655 Points +26%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
8465 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
8427 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=221, last 2 years)
7566 Points -11%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7050 Points -17%
CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
844 Points +8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
841 Points +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
836 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (779 - 859, n=23)
833 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
812 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
779 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=221, last 2 years)
702 Points -10%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
674 Points -13%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4591 (4151.1min - 4590.84max) Points +33%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
4557 Points +32%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3263 - 4875, n=23)
4406 Points +27%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4280 Points +24%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3905 (2582.31min - 3904.72max) Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3458 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=226, last 2 years)
3140 Points -9%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2840 (2743.86min - 2839.9max) Points -18%
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
312 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
312 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (287 - 320, n=23)
309 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
299 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
298 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
287 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=225, last 2 years)
269 Points -6%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
256 Points -11%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=218, last 2 years)
197.4 Seconds * -43%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
164 Seconds * -19%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
138 Seconds *
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
126 Seconds * +9%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (102 - 164, n=23)
118.9 Seconds * +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
113 Seconds * +18%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
110 Seconds * +20%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
121665 MIPS +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
115585 MIPS +18%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (87555 - 127108, n=23)
112774 MIPS +15%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
106866 MIPS +9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
97929 MIPS
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
88012 MIPS -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=220, last 2 years)
78482 MIPS -20%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
67581 MIPS -31%
7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7508 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
7409 MIPS -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7297 MIPS -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7142 MIPS -5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6206 - 7508, n=23)
7105 MIPS -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6776 MIPS -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=220, last 2 years)
6164 MIPS -18%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5037 MIPS -33%
Geekbench 6.2
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
18126 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost)
18056 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (15849 - 18643, n=23)
17564 Points +8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
17408 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
16196 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
16011 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 18590, n=80, last 2 years)
14136 Points -13%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.2.1)
12670 Points -22%
Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
3081 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
3054 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost)
3032 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2800 - 3095, n=23)
2995 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
2889 Points -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
2800 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1599 - 3095, n=80, last 2 years)
2651 Points -14%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.2.1)
2383 Points -23%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
21299 Points +24%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
20994 Points +22%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19607 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8618 - 21606, n=23)
19446 Points +13%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17612 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17214 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=225, last 2 years)
13839 Points -20%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12328 Points -28%
Single-Core
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2183 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
2152 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2107 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1669 - 2210, n=23)
2102 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2053 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2046 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=225, last 2 years)
1819 Points -14%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1741 Points -17%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
32.4 fps +35%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
30.1 fps +25%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (22.7 - 34.4, n=23)
29.6 fps +23%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
27 fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
24 fps
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
22.7 fps -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=221, last 2 years)
21.6 fps -10%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
21.2 fps -12%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
53.1 s * -37%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.3.4.2)
49.8 s * -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=217, last 2 years)
49.5 s * -27%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (33.9 - 85.1, n=23)
44.6 s * -15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
40.7 s * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
38.9 s *
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
38.5 s * +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2, Overboost)
36.1 s * +7%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.487 sec * -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=220, last 2 years)
0.4684 sec * -28%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3955 sec * -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3917 sec * -7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (0.3609 - 0.4225, n=23)
0.3818 sec * -5%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3782 sec * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
0.3684 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.365 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
3458 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
276 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
287 Points
Help
Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
99.4 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
89.6 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
80.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
68.5 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67.6 pt
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63.6 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
27412 KRay/s +36%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (17244 - 29351, n=22)
25121 KRay/s +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
25072 KRay/s +24%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
23082 KRay/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
20224 KRay/s
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=216, last 2 years)
19192 KRay/s -5%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
18470 KRay/s -9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
17244 KRay/s -15%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
137215 Points +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
129169 Points +24%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (88537 - 148888, n=22)
125646 Points +20%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
116836 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
104545 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=216, last 2 years)
96250 Points -8%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
92996 Points -11%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
88537 Points -15%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
6905 MB/s +30%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
6285 MB/s +19%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (4267 - 7229, n=22)
6189 MB/s +17%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
5723 MB/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
5293 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=216, last 2 years)
4420 MB/s -16%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
4267 MB/s -19%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
4242 MB/s -20%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
142503 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
139673 Points +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
139355 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (118405 - 148773, n=22)
138500 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
131076 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
118405 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=216, last 2 years)
110691 Points -16%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
84180 Points -36%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
15756 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
15401 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (12217 - 18256, n=22)
15333 Points +10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
14830 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
13913 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=216, last 2 years)
12328 Points -11%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
12217 Points -12%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
10617 Points -24%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
68400 Points +34%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
62567 Points +22%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (43302 - 72594, n=22)
61661 Points +21%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
57633 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
51088 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=216, last 2 years)
48934 Points -4%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
47685 Points -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
43302 Points -15%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
236096 MB/s +24%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
190740 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (86964 - 241777, n=22)
138443 MB/s -27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
120213 MB/s -37%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
112833 MB/s -41%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=216, last 2 years)
108450 MB/s -43%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
86964 MB/s -54%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
82757 MB/s -57%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
1957 MB/s +32%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1866 MB/s +26%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1265 - 2149, n=22)
1802 MB/s +21%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1662 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1485 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1265 MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=216, last 2 years)
1230 MB/s -17%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1219 MB/s -18%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
14882 KRay/s +35%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
13776 KRay/s +25%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (9170 - 16128, n=22)
13530 KRay/s +23%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
12355 KRay/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
11009 KRay/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=216, last 2 years)
10371 KRay/s -6%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
9802 KRay/s -11%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
9170 KRay/s -17%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49676 MPixel/s +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49507 MPixel/s +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49217 MPixel/s +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (33960 - 51118, n=22)
48315 MPixel/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
47721 MPixel/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
47411 MPixel/s
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
39532 MPixel/s -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=217, last 2 years)
37306 MPixel/s -21%

System performance

The smooth-running system is not lacking in computing power. Gaming, streaming and rendering do not pose any major challenges for the laptop. The RAM's transfer rates range within a normal level for DDR5-5600 RAM. Its PCMark results were also good.

The RAM runs in dual-channel mode.
The RAM runs in dual-channel mode.
PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8550 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8522 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
8389 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7866 - 8550, n=5)
8270 Points -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
7866 Points -8%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7761 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=192, last 2 years)
7614 Points -11%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11815 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11286 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (10621 - 11815, n=5)
11150 Points -6%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
11071 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=191, last 2 years)
10744 Points -9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10621 Points -10%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10330 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
11103 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10731 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9701 - 11103, n=5)
10388 Points -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10268 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10139 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=191, last 2 years)
9744 Points -9%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9422 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
14827 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12114 - 14827, n=5)
13282 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
13247 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
13036 Points -2%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
13035 Points -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
12114 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=191, last 2 years)
11541 Points -13%
CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2312 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2002 - 2312, n=4)
2207 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2203 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2002 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=165, last 2 years)
1881 Points -15%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1762 Points -20%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2191 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2109 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1827 - 2191, n=4)
2075 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1827 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=165, last 2 years)
1790 Points -15%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1684 Points -20%
CrossMark / Creativity
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2458 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2287 - 2458, n=4)
2389 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2358 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2287 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=165, last 2 years)
2050 Points -13%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1913 Points -19%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2259 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1769 - 2330, n=4)
2102 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2049 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1769 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=165, last 2 years)
1698 Points -17%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1576 Points -23%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
342 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
342 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (322 - 342, n=5)
336 Points -2%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
330 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
322 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=190, last 2 years)
300 Points -12%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
294 Points -14%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
301 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (291 - 301, n=3)
297 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
291 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (157.9 - 328, n=165, last 2 years)
263 Points -13%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
257 Points -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
546 ms * -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 824, n=203, last 2 years)
518 ms * -20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
449 ms * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (431 - 449, n=5)
439 ms * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
438 ms * -2%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
436 ms * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
431 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
8522 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78979 MB/s +2%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78854 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78330 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77669 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (56992 - 83392, n=22)
77573 MB/s 0%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63008 MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=216, last 2 years)
60079 MB/s -23%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86538 MB/s +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86376 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85867 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85070 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (54443 - 87507, n=22)
84273 MB/s -2%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76370 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 90647, n=216, last 2 years)
64143 MB/s -25%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77579 MB/s +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77406 MB/s +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77346 MB/s +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (51387 - 78199, n=22)
74508 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72287 MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66009 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=216, last 2 years)
62196 MB/s -14%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126.2 ns * -52%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=212, last 2 years)
88.6 ns * -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.5 ns * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (79.7 - 105, n=22)
84.1 ns * -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.4 ns * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.1 ns *
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.5 ns * +1%

* ... smaller is better

DPC latencies

The standardized latency monitor test (surfing the web, 4k video playback, Prime95 high load) revealed some anomalies. The system does not appear to be suitable for video and audio editing in real-time. Future software updates could lead to improvements or even deteriorations.

Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2037.7 μs * -192%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1566 μs * -124%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
1162.9 μs * -66%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
989.1 μs * -42%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
698.6 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Storage devices

The Fusion can accommodate a total of two M.2-2280-format PCIe-4 SSDs. RAID-0/1 is supported. Our test device's Samsung SSD (1TB) delivered excellent data rates. Positive: We didn't note any thermal throttling.

The laptop can accommodate two PCIe-4 SSDs.
The laptop can accommodate two PCIe-4 SSDs.
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7119 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6895 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 790 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 550.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2954 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4529 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 65.05 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 281.6 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
89.8 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
 
83.8 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.4 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
78.3 pt
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
77.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
68.2 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
57.6 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4480 (4426.62min - 4479.73max) MB/s +23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4037 (3964.04min - 4036.7max) MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3645 (3579.03min - 3644.85max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=191, last 2 years)
3500 MB/s -4%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2809 - 4234, n=11)
3355 MB/s -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3102 (3080.64min - 3101.78max) MB/s -15%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2620 (2556.56min - 2619.76max) MB/s -28%
seq write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3637 - 5842, n=11)
4901 MB/s +13%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4757 (4720.06min - 4757.31max) MB/s +10%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4371 (4342.15min - 4371.09max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4342 (4320.81min - 4342.28max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4093 (4016.82min - 4092.8max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=191, last 2 years)
3749 MB/s -14%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3038 (2862.26min - 3038.15max) MB/s -30%
seq q8 t1 read
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (7011 - 7148, n=11)
7103 MB/s +1%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7079 (6575.14min - 7078.73max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7011 (6063.46min - 7010.81max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6636 (6205.02min - 6635.75max) MB/s -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
6388 (5544.27min - 6387.72max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2268 - 16089, n=191, last 2 years)
6279 MB/s -10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
5181 (4323.23min - 5181.35max) MB/s -26%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6897 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (6531 - 6897, n=11)
6775 MB/s -2%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5250 (5191.5min - 5250.22max) MB/s -24%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5234 (5167.11min - 5234.47max) MB/s -24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4949 (4932.28min - 4948.61max) MB/s -28%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4821 (4606.6min - 4820.72max) MB/s -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=191, last 2 years)
4721 MB/s -32%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
92.7 (91.49min - 92.68max) MB/s +29%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
83.5 (82.8min - 83.52max) MB/s +16%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (55.3 - 84.5, n=11)
74.7 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
71.8 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=191, last 2 years)
67.5 MB/s -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
51.3 (50.48min - 51.25max) MB/s -29%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
47.2 (45.9min - 47.16max) MB/s -34%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
340 (329.38min - 339.78max) MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
290 (278.05min - 290.22max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
251 (249.74min - 251.16max) MB/s -13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (146.3 - 343, n=11)
250 MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=191, last 2 years)
223 MB/s -23%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
198.1 (195.9min - 198.06max) MB/s -32%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
128.1 (123.78min - 128.05max) MB/s -56%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4915 (4860.82min - 4914.87max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4055 (4044.11min - 4055.48max) MB/s -17%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3630 (3471.35min - 3629.9max) MB/s -26%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (818 - 4923, n=11)
3366 MB/s -32%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3302 (3194.22min - 3302.44max) MB/s -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=191, last 2 years)
2576 MB/s -48%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
900 (832.36min - 900.34max) MB/s -82%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3542 (3491.17min - 3541.69max) MB/s +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3443 (3007.99min - 3443.05max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3406 (3365.94min - 3405.88max) MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3003 (2991.33min - 3002.71max) MB/s -12%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (413 - 4683, n=11)
2709 MB/s -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=191, last 2 years)
2127 MB/s -38%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
438 (405.08min - 437.5max) MB/s -87%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9475 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
8778 Points -7%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (5405 - 10265, n=11)
8463 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8364 Points -12%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8059 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=179, last 2 years)
6785 Points -28%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5138 Points -46%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3530 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3233 Points -8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3152 Points -11%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1349 - 4721, n=11)
3049 Points -14%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3005 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (760 - 4721, n=179, last 2 years)
2480 Points -30%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1458 Points -59%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4145 Points
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2308 - 4684, n=11)
4009 Points -3%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4006 Points -3%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3573 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3543 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=179, last 2 years)
3106 Points -25%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3029 Points -27%
Seq Read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5760.15 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5625.54 MB/s -2%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5592.15 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5355.36 MB/s -7%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (4362 - 5760, n=11)
5138 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=179, last 2 years)
4908 MB/s -15%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4161.31 MB/s -28%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5243.63 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3376 - 5609, n=11)
4780 MB/s -9%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4431.76 MB/s -15%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4431.18 MB/s -15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3950.35 MB/s -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=179, last 2 years)
3612 MB/s -31%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3587.95 MB/s -32%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
82.62 MB/s +29%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
71.52 MB/s +12%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (61.2 - 76.8, n=11)
70.4 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 112.1, n=179, last 2 years)
66.5 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
63.85 MB/s
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
61.86 MB/s -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
49.79 MB/s -22%
4K Write
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
283.44 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
242.28 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (181.9 - 306, n=11)
226 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
213.76 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (96.3 - 512, n=179, last 2 years)
210 MB/s -13%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
191.79 MB/s -21%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
179.15 MB/s -26%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2982.47 MB/s
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2673.76 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2615.17 MB/s -12%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (787 - 3164, n=11)
2383 MB/s -20%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2374.63 MB/s -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (442 - 3475, n=179, last 2 years)
1917 MB/s -36%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
845.48 MB/s -72%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3413.79 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1592 - 3975, n=11)
3317 MB/s -3%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3279.44 MB/s -4%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2951.09 MB/s -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2933.74 MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=179, last 2 years)
2537 MB/s -26%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2478.06 MB/s -27%
Access Time Read
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
0.088 ms * -76%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=178, last 2 years)
0.05465 ms * -9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.054 ms * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.05 ms *
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.047 ms * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.042 ms * +16%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.018 - 0.074, n=11)
0.03891 ms * +22%
Access Time Write
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.07 ms * -268%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.059 ms * -211%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=179, last 2 years)
0.04746 ms * -150%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.012 - 0.053, n=11)
0.02091 ms * -10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.02 ms * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.019 ms *
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
0.015 ms * +21%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6988 (6262.46-7033.01)
Aorus 16X 2024 Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5164 (4823.45-5192.86)
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7063 (6446.85-7107.46)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6318 (5640.08-6341.89)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5723 (3286.38-6614.84)

Graphics card

Schenker has allowed the laptop's GeForce RTX 4070 a maximum TGP of 140 watts (115 watts + 25 watts Dynamic Boost)—more isn't recommended by Nvidia. The GPU has access to 8 GB VRAM (GDDR6)—a little on the low side for today's demands. The benchmarks delivered results above the RTX-4070 average (Enthusiast) and Overboost only resulted in a small advantage. Switching between the dGPU and Optimus requires a restart.

Fire Strike (Enthusiast, connected to mains)
Fire Strike (Enthusiast, connected to mains)
Fire Strike (Enthusiast, battery mode)
Fire Strike (Enthusiast, battery mode)
Fire Strike (Overboost, connected to mains)
Fire Strike (Overboost, connected to mains)
Fire Strike (Balanced, connected to mains)
Fire Strike (Balanced, connected to mains)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
100 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
96.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
95.8 pt
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
94.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
90.1 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
89.6 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
88.3 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
85.3 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
46434 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
44902 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
43689 Points -3%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
42296 Points -6%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
41457 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=220, last 2 years)
40873 Points -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24229 - 46434, n=50)
40358 Points -10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
39424 Points -12%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
32533 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
31274 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
31105 Points -1%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
30932 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=225, last 2 years)
29710 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (16212 - 33451, n=50)
29284 Points -6%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
29156 Points -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
28461 Points -9%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
13391 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13336 Points +5%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12997 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12682 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=222, last 2 years)
12161 Points -4%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12048 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (6241 - 13391, n=49)
11762 Points -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
11181 Points -12%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
63892 points
3DMark 11 Performance
36008 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
26661 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
13067 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
23 Seconds * -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 142, n=183, last 2 years)
23 Seconds * -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18 - 28, n=49)
21.4 Seconds * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
21 Seconds *
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3.3.3)
20 Seconds * +5%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
20 Seconds * +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Overboost)
20 Seconds * +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
19 Seconds * +10%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=190, last 2 years)
39.1 Seconds * -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 142, n=52)
38.9 Seconds * -22%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
36 Seconds * -13%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3.3.3)
33 Seconds * -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
32 Seconds * -0%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
32 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
32 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Overboost)
32 Seconds * -0%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=203, last 2 years)
314 Seconds * -29%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
298 Seconds * -23%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3.3.3)
296 Seconds * -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 428, n=49)
286 Seconds * -18%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
243 Seconds *
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
227 Seconds * +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
205 Seconds * +16%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Overboost)
185 Seconds * +24%
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
129366 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
128643 Points -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
126537 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 226512, n=224, last 2 years)
121764 Points -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
118601 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
112841 Points -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (17391 - 129366, n=49)
112810 Points -13%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
111153 Points -14%
Vulkan Score
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
93143 Points +32%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
75575 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
70440 Points
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
65414 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
58476 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (1952 - 160279, n=220, last 2 years)
43311 Points -39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (4898 - 93339, n=48)
41270 Points -41%
Geekbench 6.2
GPU OpenCL
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
129836 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost)
129433 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
120468 Points -7%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
120176 Points -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (101474 - 129836, n=26)
116734 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (4321 - 207373, n=80, last 2 years)
116579 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
115718 Points -11%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.2.1)
112875 Points -13%
GPU Vulkan
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost)
120033 Points +14%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.2.1)
110951 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
105334 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
104883 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
90584 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (4286 - 196201, n=77, last 2 years)
73235 Points -30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9035 - 120033, n=24)
61467 Points -41%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=122, last 2 years)
2066 mpaths +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1868 mpaths +6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, Overboost)
1854 mpaths +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1758 mpaths
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5.0.1)
1738 mpaths -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1737 mpaths -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (171 - 1872, n=28)
1647 mpaths -6%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=126, last 2 years)
1480 mpaths +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1333 mpaths +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, Overboost)
1325 mpaths +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1266 mpaths
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5.0.1)
1259 mpaths -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1256 mpaths -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (120 - 1333, n=28)
1185 mpaths -6%
CPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, Overboost)
20388 mpaths +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
19077 mpaths +23%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
17465 mpaths +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
15556 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (10005 - 20388, n=27)
14768 mpaths -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1690 - 26944, n=136, last 2 years)
13716 mpaths -12%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5.0.1)
12776 mpaths -18%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
675 mpaths +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07, Overboost)
635 mpaths +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1334, n=178, last 2 years)
615 mpaths +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (500 - 686, n=35)
605 mpaths 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
602 mpaths
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
596 mpaths -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
587 mpaths -2%
CPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07, Overboost)
30730 ksamples +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
28791 ksamples +23%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
26677 ksamples +14%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
23407 ksamples
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
21634 ksamples -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12638 - 35173, n=35)
21282 ksamples -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2741 - 37629, n=178, last 2 years)
19548 ksamples -16%

* ... smaller is better

Gaming performance

The hardware is intended for QHD gaming at high to maximum settings. By using DLSS 3 and Frame Generation, you could play games at higher resolutions and maximum settings including ray tracing—but only with games which support these functions. We noted frame rates above the RTX-4070 average (Enthusiast) and Overboost resulted in a small advantage.

Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
99.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
98 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95.9 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.8 pt
Alienware m16 R2 -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
82.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
81.8 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
133.7 (126min) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
133 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
128 (110min) fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
122 fps -5%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
121.3 (115min) fps -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=216, last 2 years)
118.3 fps -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
114 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69.8 - 133.7, n=52)
111.9 fps -13%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
140.5 (9.33min, 90.9P1) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
137.6 (8.45min, 90.9P1) fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
127.2 (5.17min, 83.3P1) fps -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.8 (21.8min, 83.3P1) fps -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (63.5 - 140.5, n=44)
112.6 fps -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=208, last 2 years)
107.9 fps -22%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
107.2 (4.31min, 71.4P1) fps -22%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost)
131.9 fps +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
131 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
124.6 fps
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
119.3 fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (66 - 131.9, n=47)
112.5 fps -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.13 - 194.9, n=218, last 2 years)
112.2 fps -10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
111.5 fps -11%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
108.3 fps -13%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
234 (27.8min, 175.8P1) fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost)
222 (29.4min, 167.7P1) fps +4%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
219 (38.5min, 163.7P1) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
214 (38.2min, 161.4P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 421, n=215, last 2 years)
209 fps -2%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
204 (69.2min, 153P1) fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (117.7 - 234, n=47)
198.1 fps -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
194.2 (59.2min, 144.5P1) fps -9%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
187.5 (160.5min) fps +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
185.3 (161min) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
182.1 (158.8min) fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
180.9 (156.5min) fps -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
154.1 (133.3min) fps -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (89.7 - 187.5, n=48)
150.8 fps -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (26.9 - 220, n=227, last 2 years)
143.9 fps -21%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
139.7 (120.9min) fps -23%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
138.4 fps +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
137.6 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
136.9 fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126.4 fps -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
114.9 fps -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (72.2 - 144.4, n=50)
108.2 fps -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=233, last 2 years)
102.9 fps -25%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90.8 fps -34%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02, Overboost)
90.7 (67.4min) fps +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 144.7, n=47, last 2 years)
89.2 fps +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
87.1 (52.5min) fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
87 (55.2min) fps
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
83.1 (28.4min) fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (64.3 - 90.7, n=18)
82.6 fps -5%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
75.8 (32.9min) fps -13%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Gaming
  (32.9 - 103.9, n=38, last 2 years)
66.5 fps +26%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02, Overboost)
55.6 (42.5min) fps +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
52.8 (33.2min) fps 0%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
52.7 (40.5min) fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
52.6 (39.5min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (39.6 - 57.1, n=18)
51 fps -3%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
49.4 (29.5min) fps -6%
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.9 - 75.5, n=31, last 2 years)
49.3 fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02, Overboost)
46.8 (23.6min) fps +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
44.8 (15.7min) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
43.8 (34.3min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (40.9 - 46.8, n=11)
43.6 fps 0%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
42.4 (28.4min) fps -3%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
40.9 (21.5min) fps -7%
Dragon's Dogma 2
1920x1080 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
80 (32.5min, 42.2P0.1, 60.3P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (65.7 - 80, n=2)
72.9 fps -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (49.5 - 80, n=3, last 2 years)
64.3 fps -20%
2560x1440 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
61.3 (37.3min, 38.9P0.1, 48.6P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (57.4 - 61.3, n=2)
59.4 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (34.6 - 61.3, n=2, last 2 years)
48 fps -22%
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
128.5 fps +22%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
125.6 fps +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (34.5 - 208, n=26, last 2 years)
106.1 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105 (60.3min, 63.9P0.1, 89.7P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (71.3 - 128.5, n=13)
105 fps 0%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89.6 fps +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (44 - 155.2, n=19, last 2 years)
89 fps +8%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88.3 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.1 (30.4min, 49.4P0.1, 68.2P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (54.4 - 89.6, n=12)
74 fps -10%
Alone in the Dark
1920x1080 Cinematic Preset
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126 (31.5min, 37.7P0.1, 88.8P1) fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
124.7 (21.3min, 36.4P0.1, 57.1P1) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (114 - 126, n=3)
121.6 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.6 - 176.4, n=4, last 2 years)
110.2 fps -13%
2560x1440 Cinematic Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (64.7 - 91.6, n=3, last 2 years)
77.6 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76.6 (24.8min, 34.2P0.1, 53.6P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (64.7 - 76.6, n=3)
71.1 fps -7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64.7 (22.8min, 23.8P0.1, 30.9P1) fps -16%
Alan Wake 2
1920x1080 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70.1 (30.2min, 35.2P0.1, 41.2P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (65.1 - 70.1, n=4)
68.5 fps -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.1 - 121.1, n=17, last 2 years)
67.7 fps -3%
2560x1440 High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (22.5 - 83.7, n=12, last 2 years)
59.9 fps +40%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
42.8 (10.4min, 22.7P0.1, 29.2P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (40.2 - 43.8, n=4)
42.3 fps -1%
The Witcher 3 v4.00
1920x1080 Ultra Preset / On AA:FX
Average of class Gaming
  (25.7 - 150, n=17, last 2 years)
87.3 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.5 (7.86min, 52.7P0.1, 64.6P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (85 - 86.5, n=2)
85.8 fps -1%
1920x1080 RT Ultra Preset / On AA:FX
Average of class Gaming
  (12.9 - 66, n=11, last 2 years)
42.3 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
40.4 (8.77min, 13.8P0.1, 30.3P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (36 - 40.4, n=2)
38.2 fps -5%

In order to test whether its frame rates remain stable over a longer period of time, we let the game The Witcher 3 run for around 60 minutes in Full HD and with the settings set to the maximum. We didn't move the game character. We didn't note a collapse in frame rate, however, they sank by a few per cent after about 50 minutes (Enthusiast). With the profile Overboost activated, this behavior did not occur.

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; FPS: Ø123.4 (111-129)
Aorus 16X 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; FPS: Ø118.6 (114-123)
Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø110 (97-116)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø113.2 (109-118)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø118.3 (114-125)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Overboost: Ø130.2 (125-135)
Witcher 3 (Enthusiast)
Witcher 3 (Enthusiast)
Witcher 3 (Overboost)
Witcher 3 (Overboost)
low med. high ultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 187.8 187 186.4 137.6 98.2
The Witcher 3 (2015) 603.3 418.4 246.2 128 92.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 234 207 196.5 182.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 226 175.5 124.6 90.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 205 173.3 136.9
Far Cry 5 (2018) 204 176 166 157 124
Strange Brigade (2018) 558 313 245 214 139.2
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) 271 215 176.2 86.5
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 157.2 121.2 106.1 105 82.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) 156.6 124.5 103.6 87 52.6
Alan Wake 2 (2023) 74.3 71.4 70.1 42.8
Alone in the Dark (2024) 222 209 196.5 126 76.6
Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) 83.9 80 61.3

Emissions - The Schenker laptop gets pretty hot

Noise emissions

In everyday use and when idling, the laptop runs very quietly. Although the fans are permanently activated (they can be deactivated via the BIOS), they can only be heard in very quiet surroundings. Under load, things quickly change: We noted nose emissions up to 53 dB(A) (Enthusiast). The mode Overboost resulted in even higher values. The device runs considerably quieter when using the mode Balanced—at the cost of some performance.

Noise Level

Idle
27 / 28 / 33 dB(A)
Load
52 / 53 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.640.242.642.940.92534.736.639.140.936.73141.545.949.24645.5402729.331.532.932.15028.427.32825.227.96337.128.428.924.435.38044.725.218.817.543.810025.319.91916.826.112524.319.719.717.327.516027.622.419.918.429.620029.326.525.324.531.225030.325.521.419.431.231531.520.818.416.233.240034.921.217.613.135.850036.924.716.911.638.263038.923.516.711.339.480040.523.215.311.540.5100041.322.115.311.341.5125041.922.315.411.142.7160043.122.415.111.643.3200043.321.314.611.843.4250042.919.914.312.243.2315042.319.713.512.742.1400040.817.513.512.740.8500039.615.713.612.839.2630038.716.513.912.738.7800036.11613.813.236.11000033.416.91412.833.11250030.117.514.113.229.81600027.226.118.920.827.4SPL52.932.927.425.153.1N8.71.80.90.68.8median 36.9median 21.2median 15.3median 12.8median 38.2Delta5.82.52.22.45.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise
-5%
8%
5%
6%
off / environment *
25
26
-4%
24.7
1%
24
4%
23.9
4%
Idle Minimum *
27
26
4%
25.3
6%
29
-7%
24.3
10%
Idle Average *
28
32
-14%
25.3
10%
30
-7%
24.3
13%
Idle Maximum *
33
38
-15%
25.3
23%
31
6%
28.9
12%
Load Average *
52
54
-4%
31.7
39%
45
13%
45.8
12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
50
2%
53.8
-5%
44
14%
51
-0%
Load Maximum *
53
55
-4%
62
-17%
47
11%
56.6
-7%

* ... smaller is better

Temperature

The stress test and Witcher 3 test led the laptop to heat up considerably. At times, it hit values within the upper 50-degree-Celcius range. In everyday use (office, internet), the values generally remain within the green zone.

Max. Load
 48 °C
118 F
48 °C
118 F
47 °C
117 F
 
 43 °C
109 F
44 °C
111 F
42 °C
108 F
 
 33 °C
91 F
34 °C
93 F
33 °C
91 F
 
Maximum: 48 °C = 118 F
Average: 41.3 °C = 106 F
54 °C
129 F
56 °C
133 F
49 °C
120 F
50 °C
122 F
51 °C
124 F
41 °C
106 F
33 °C
91 F
33 °C
91 F
32 °C
90 F
Maximum: 56 °C = 133 F
Average: 44.3 °C = 112 F
Power Supply (max.)  44 °C = 111 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat
-5%
-14%
-6%
-8%
Maximum Upper Side *
48
41
15%
44.8
7%
49
-2%
43.8
9%
Maximum Bottom *
56
41
27%
48
14%
63
-13%
55.4
1%
Idle Upper Side *
28
37
-32%
37.2
-33%
30
-7%
32.8
-17%
Idle Bottom *
29
38
-31%
42
-45%
29
-0%
36
-24%

* ... smaller is better

Stress test

The extreme scenario simulated by the stress test (Prime95 and Furmark in continuous operation) checks the system's stability under full load. The CPU clock sank slowly and continuously from values slightly above the base clock rate to values below it. The graphics core ran at high speeds throughout.

Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3

Speakers

The laptop's stereo speakers produce a decent sound, but they lack bass. A better sound experience could be achieved by connecting headphones or external speakers.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.9452540.939.5314650.94032.933.45025.232.86324.433.88017.527.410016.826.912517.339.916018.453.620024.564.525019.468.731516.268.440013.171.950011.68163011.380.480011.574100011.369.9125011.170.6160011.670.6200011.872.8250012.270315012.769.3400012.768.3500012.865.9630012.773.8800013.273.31000012.869.31250013.268.91600020.869.5SPL25.185.1N0.667median 12.8median 69.5Delta2.42.640.238.141.53751.448.536.534.544.244.429.432.924.739.221.449.129.258.225.563.323.564.621.26716.267.21470.614.377.615.777.812.574.711.770.211.666.911.970.512.369.312.872.913.370.814.176.813.770.91465.513.868.213.270.112.971.612.465.826.584.50.865.9median 13.8median 70.13.53.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)Aorus 16X 2024
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Aorus 16X 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power management - The Fusion 15 delivers very good runtimes

Power consumption

Its power requirement is largely normal for the installed hardware. Exception: Despite a fully charged battery, we measured a power consumption value of about 20 watts with the laptop switched off. This is likely a bug. The Witcher 3 test and stress test ran with slightly sinking power consumption values. The power supply (280 watts) is sufficient in power.

Power Consumption
Idledarkmidlight 8 / 14 / 26 Watt
Load midlight 118 / 244 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-21%
-3%
-10%
-22%
Idle Minimum *
8
13
-63%
8.1
-1%
10
-25%
Idle Average *
14
18
-29%
13
7%
18
-29%
Idle Maximum *
26
35
-35%
40.3
-55%
32
-23%
Load Average *
118
138
-17%
79
33%
128
-8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
192.7
172.6
10%
188.1
2%
148.4
23%
Load Maximum *
244
222
9%
254.9
-4%
242
1%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø192.7 (182.8-220)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø195.5 (184.9-229)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø13.5 (8.11-25.8)

Power consumption with external monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø111.6 (110.9-114.8)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø109.5 (108.4-112.6)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø167.2 (164.2-172.9)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø187.8 (163.3-206)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø20.1 (16.6-24.4)

Runtimes

During our WiFi test (loading websites via a script) and video test (short film Big Buck Bunny (H.264 encoding, FHD) in a loop), we measured runtimes of 8:00 hours and 10:02 hours respectively. These are very good values.

The battery has a capacity of 99.8 Wh.
The battery has a capacity of 99.8 Wh.
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
15h 11min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 124)
8h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 02min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 44min
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-17%
-26%
-39%
-52%
-36%
Reader / Idle
911
753
-17%
758
-17%
403
-56%
H.264
602
541
-10%
WiFi v1.3
480
481
0%
483
1%
292
-39%
290
-40%
Load
164
100
-39%
60
-63%
65
-60%

Pros

+ bright QHD+ screen with 16:10 aspect ratio (240 Hz, Adaptive Sync, sRGB)
+ high system performance
+ two SSD slots (PCIe 4, M.2-2280)
+ RAM can be swapped/expanded
+ single-key RGB backlighting
+ Thunderbolt 4
+ Power Delivery
+ very good runtimes

Cons

- loud and hot under full load
- 8 GB VRAM not very future-proof
- no Advanced Optimus

Verdict - Portable, powerful, persevering

The XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24), test sample provided by Schenker.
The XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24), test sample provided by Schenker.

Compact dimensions and low weight (approx. 2.1 kg) don't come at the cost of reduced hardware performance. The Core i9 processor and GeForce RTX 4070 are able to work with consistently high clock rates. The laptop's fusion of performance and portability can be classed as a success.

The XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)—a powerful, portable laptop for gamers and creators.

The laptop gets quite hot under load and in doing so, it produces quite a bit of noise. More moderate emissions require sacrificing some computing power. Its 15.3-inch screen (2,560 x 1,600 pixels, IPS, 240 Hz, Adaptive Sync) featuring a 16:10 aspect ratio is impressive overall. Its high brightness is noteworthy.

One full charge (99.8 Wh) is enough for practical runtimes of about 8 - 10 hours—very good values. Positive: The battery can be charged via a USB-C power supply (min. 100 watts, 20 V)—the laptop's TB4 port supports Power Delivery. As a result, you don't necessarily have to carry the proprietary power supply (280 watts) with you all the time.

An alternative could be the Aorus 16X (2024). This laptop offers comparable computing power as well as similarly good runtimes.

Price and availability

The XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) can be configured and ordered directly via Schenker's online shop. The present test device costs around US$2,500. Prices start from approx. US$1,700.

SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) - 05/01/2024 v7
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
83 / 98 → 84%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
72 / 80 → 90%
Weight
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Battery
82 / 95 → 86%
Display
92%
Games Performance
99%
Application Performance
97%
Temperature
81 / 95 → 85%
Noise
68 / 90 → 76%
Audio
82%
Camera
46 / 85 → 54%
Average
79%
89%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Read all 2 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) review: A compact RTX 4070 laptop for gamers and creators
Sascha Mölck, 2024-05- 4 (Update: 2024-05- 4)