Notebookcheck Logo
Best smartphones of the smaller kind tested and ranked by Notebookcheck

Ranking: Best compact smartphones reviewed by Notebookcheck

Q3 2025 update.

Smartphones with large displays are omnipresent now. Ubiquitous. It's small phones that are hard to find, which is why we came up with a list of the most compact smartphones currently available on the market that have been extensively tested by Notebookcheck and got a good to very good rating.
Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪 🇹🇷 ...
Smartphone Apple Android Charts

Just what is a compact smartphone? This is certainly a question that different consumers have a different answer to. The width/length of the case as well as the display diagonal are the most obvious criteria but with display edges becoming ever narrower, the phone's display-to-surface ratio is certainly an important factor, too. Foldables bring another level of complexity int the picture. Although these are rather narrow (or short) when folded, they are considerably thicker than regular phones.

We decided to use the volume of a smartphone as the main criteria. To make the list, a smartphone can't have a volume large than 88,000 mm³ or a length of over 156 mm. Below are the best phones that meet the threshold and were reviewed by us over the last 18 months (full reviews are linked in the table).

Smaller smartphones tested and ranked

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Dimensions
Display
Screen / Body
1.
88.9%
Samsung Galaxy S25
Samsung Galaxy S25
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $7.39
amFilm Auto-alignment OneTou...
2. $7.58
firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree...
3. $9.72
Ferilinso 3 Pack Privacy Scr...
List Price: 899€
162 g70.5 x 146.9 x 7.2 mm
74566 mm³
6.20"
2340x1080
416 PPI
AMOLED
91.1 %
2.
88.4%
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $11.99
Ibywind for Xiaomi 15 Ultra ...
2. $11.99
Ibywind 2 Pack Screen Protec...
3. $19.98
120W Fast Wall Charger Block...
List Price: 760€
191 g71.2 x 152.3 x 8.08 mm
87618 mm³
6.36"
2670x1200
460 PPI
OLED
94 %
3.
88.2%
Apple iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16
Apple A18 ⎘
Apple A18 GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $899.00
iPhone 16 / 128GB / Black (S...
2. $39.99
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Silicone...
3. $39.99
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Sili...
List Price: 1329€
170 g71.6 x 147.6 x 7.8 mm
82432 mm³
6.10"
2556x1179
460 PPI
Super Retina XDR OLED
86 %
4.
87.9%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Apple A18 Pro ⎘
Apple A18 Pro GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe
Amazon:
1. $39.99
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Silicone...
2. $39.99
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Sili...
3. $8.98
Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto...
List Price: 1200 Euro
199 g71.5 x 149.6 x 8.25 mm
88780 mm³
6.30"
2622x1206
460 PPI
Super Retina XDR OLED
91 %
5.
86.2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Samsung Exynos 2500 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 950 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon: $1,069.99
List Price: 1199€
188 g75.2 x 166.7 x 6.5 mm
81483 mm³
6.90"
2520x1080
397 PPI
AMOLED
88.7 %
6.
85.7%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon:
1. $925.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro - Unlocke...
2. $1,505.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - Un...
3. $9.99
OMOTON 3+2 Pack for Google P...
199 g72 x 152.8 x 8.5 mm
93514 mm³
6.30"
2856x1280
495 PPI
OLED
87 %
7.
84.9%
Google Pixel 9
Google Pixel 9
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon:
1. $699.00
Google Pixel 9 - Unlocked An...
2. $1,505.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - Un...
3. $138.90
Original for Google Pixel 9a...
List Price: 899€
198 g72 x 152.8 x 8.5 mm
93514 mm³
6.30"
2424x1080
421 PPI
OLED
87 %
8.
84.8%
Vivo X200 FE
Vivo X200 FE
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $10.89
TNKISRY Tempered Glass for V...
2. $7.99
Lucyliy (3 packs) Compatible...
3. $15.99
AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr...
List Price: 799€
186 g71.76 x 150.83 x 7.99 mm
86480 mm³
6.31"
2640x1216
461 PPI
AMOLED
90 %
9.
84.1%
Apple iPhone 16e
Apple iPhone 16e
Apple A18 ⎘
Apple A18 GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe
Amazon:
1. $34.99
Apple iPhone 16e Silicone Ca...
2. $5.99
Ailun Screen Protector for i...
3. $7.99
iPhone 16e Charger Block USB...
List Price: 699 Euro
167 g71.5 x 146.7 x 7.8 mm
81815 mm³
6.10"
2532x1170
460 PPI
OLED
87 %
10.
81%
Google Pixel 9a
Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon:
1. $7.99
Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design...
2. $7.87
Ferilinso 3 Pack Privacy Scr...
3. $138.90
Original for Google Pixel 9a...
List Price: 549€
185.9 g73.3 x 154.7 x 8.9 mm
100922 mm³
6.30"
2424x1080
421 PPI
pOLED
84 %

The table above shows an overview of the best compact smartphones tested by Notebookcheck in the last 18 months along with other relevant models that are still available. If multiple products have the same rating, the newer review is ranked higher. Prices are updated daily and may change accordingly.
Link: all tested products in this class according to volume or length
 

Editorial comment

This quarter we say goodbye to the Galaxy Z Flip6 and the Xiaomi Flip; new additions are the Galaxy Z Flip7 and the Vivo X200 FE.

Both the Honor 400 as well as the Fairphone 6 fail by half a centimeter, but would also have had a hard time based on the rating. Promising candidates for the next quarter are the iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Pro, Pixel 10 and Pixel 10 Pro.

1st place - Samsung Galaxy S25

The Galaxy S25 is the best compact phone currently available (Image source: Daniel Schmidt)
Samsung Galaxy S25

The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a compact flagship smartphone with a screen size of 6.2 inches. It is equipped with the Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, which promises a significant increase in performance compared to the previous model. The device offers 12 GB of RAM and is available in storage variants of 128 GB, 256 GB and 512 GB.

The AMOLED display supports an adaptive refresh rate of up to 120 Hz and offers a Full HD+ resolution. The camera equipment includes a main camera with optical image stabilization, a 12-megapixel ultra-wide-angle camera and a telephoto lens with triple optical zoom.

The Samsung Galaxy S25 is positioned as a powerful flagship smartphone with modern AI functions and is even more compact than its predecessor.

The 4,000 mAh battery supports wired charging with 25 watts as well as wireless charging via Fast Wireless Charging 2.0. The device is IP68 certified, which offers protection against water and dust. Despite its high-quality features, the Galaxy S25 remains light and compact with a weight of 162 grams. The Galaxy S25 also offers advanced AI functions, including the Google Gemini Assistant.

2nd place - Xiaomi 15

Xiaomi's 15 is a very good compact phone (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Xiaomi 15

The Xiaomi 15 is a compact flagship smartphone with a 6.36-inch display that offers top performance despite its compact size. It uses the new Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC from Qualcomm. The LTPO OLED display of the Xiaomi 15 is characterized by exceptional brightness. In HDR mode, peak values of over 3,500 cd/m² are achieved.

The Xiaomi 15 sets new standards in terms of performance and battery life in the compact flagship smartphone category.

Another highlight is the battery life. Thanks to a large battery with a silicon-carbon anode, which enables a higher energy density, the Xiaomi 15 lasts almost 23 hours of simulated web surfing. That's over four hours more than its predecessor. The triple camera with three 50 MPix sensors has been slightly adapted: The optical zoom of the telephoto lens is now 2.6x instead of 3.2x as in last year's model, which slightly reduces the flexibility of the Leica camera system.

The Xiaomi 15 is currently only available as an import, for example from TradingShenzhen, but should soon be available globally.

3rd place - Apple iPhone 16

The iPhone 16 is a very good compact phone (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Apple iPhone 16

The Apple iPhone 16 is surprisingly ahead of the Pro model in the overall rating, which is mainly due to its lower weight. It offers a fast SoC and a bright display, but has to make do with a meagre 60 Hz refresh rate.

The iPhone 16 is a great smartphone if the meagre 60 Hz refresh rate is not a knock-out criterion.

Although the dual camera has to make do without optical zoom, at least the 2x magnification works almost loss-free in everyday use thanks to the sensor crop. The limitations of the Pro models also apply here, and only USB 2.0 is on board, which is a bit meagre considering the price range.

4th place - Apple iPhone 16 Pro

The iPhone 16 Pro is a decent compact phone (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro

The Apple iPhone 16 Pro is powered by the Apple A18 Pro, which provides plenty of computing, AI and gaming power. The display is not only very bright, but also boasts accurate color reproduction. Thanks to LTPO technology, the refresh rate is dynamically adjusted up to 120 Hz.

The iPhone 16 Pro series offers a powerful overall package with only a few shortcomings.

The triple camera offers good to very good image quality with all lenses. In particular, the videography should be emphasized here again, which now also supports recordings in Ultra HD with up to 120 frames per second as well as Dolby Vision and is currently unsurpassed in its versatility.

The only points of criticism are the lack of support for 320 MHz Wi-Fi and the absence of high-res audio codecs for Bluetooth.

5th place - Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

The Galaxy Z Flip7 is a very good compact phone (Image source: Daniel Schmidt)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 presents itself as a high-quality foldable that has been improved in several ways. Thanks to Gorilla Glass Victus 2, a stable folding mechanism and IP48 certification, the casing is robust and has a high-quality finish. With a 6.9-inch main OLED that is very bright and high-contrast, as well as an enlarged 4.1-inch external display, the device offers an appealing picture quality and extended usage options.

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 is a high-quality flip smartphone with long updates and good battery life, but loses some of its appeal due to limited outdoor display functions, slow charging and weaker performance.

Nevertheless, the front panel remains limited in its functionality and cannot fully replace the internal display. The long update guarantee of seven years, the current software base with Android 16 and One UI 8 and the increased battery capacity of around 4,300 mAh compared to its predecessor, which provides a solid battery life, are positive points. However, there is criticism of the charging speed, which remains relatively slow both wired and wirelessly, as well as the performance: in Europe, the smartphone is delivered with the Exynos 2500, which lags behind the Snapdragon version and is noticeably throttled under load.

If you are interested in the cheaper entry-level model with the Galaxy Z Flip FE, you should also take a look at the Flip6 from the previous year, as the two devices are almost identical.

6th place - Google Pixel 9 Pro

The Pixel 9 Pro is a decent compact phone (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Google Pixel 9 Pro

The Google Pixel 9 Pro is a compact flagship smartphone with a 6.3-inch LTPO OLED display that achieves an impressive brightness of up to 3,000 cd/m² in HDR mode. Powered by the Google Tensor G4 SoC and equipped with 16 GB of RAM and up to 512 GB of UFS 3.1 storage, it offers solid performance, although it lags behind some of its competitors in benchmarks.

The Pixel 9 Pro scores points with its bright display, versatile camera and long update guarantee, while there are slight compromises in terms of charging speed and performance.

The triple camera includes a 50-megapixel main camera, a 48-megapixel telephoto lens with 5x optical zoom and a 48-megapixel ultra-wide-angle camera, which together deliver excellent image quality in various shooting situations. The 4,700 mAhbattery enables a runtime of almost 17 hours when surfing the web, although wired charging is comparatively slow at up to 27 watts. On a positive note, Google has promised to provide the device with software and security updates for a period of seven years.

7th place - Google Pixel 9

The Pixel 9 is a decent compact phone (Image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Google Pixel 9

The Google Pixel 9 has a 6.3-inch OLED display, which has a refresh rate of up to 120 Hz and can be very bright. The dual camera on the back takes beautiful photos, but has no optical zoom.

The Pixel 9 not only offers a compact form factor, but also seven years of updates.

The features are rounded off by Wi-Fi 7, 5G with wide frequency coverage, USB 3.2, wireless charging and IP68 certification. However, the SoC is the slowest in the high-end range and the charging speed also leaves a lot to be desired.

8th place - Vivo X200 FE

The X200 FE is a decent compact phone (Image source: Marcus Herbrich)
Vivo X200 FE

The Vivo X200 FE is a compact premium smartphone that impresses with its high-quality workmanship, IP68/IP69 certification and a very bright 6.31-inch LTPO OLED display. Thanks to the large battery, it offers excellent battery life, supports fast charging and delivers strong performance with the MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, although this is noticeably throttled under load.

The Vivo X200 FE impresses with a strong display, long battery life and a good main camera, but falls short when it comes to USB speed, additional cameras and performance stability.

The main camera with Zeiss optics takes very good pictures, especially in daylight, while the ultra-wide-angle and telephoto cameras perform less well due to a lack of image stabilization. Modern standards such as WiFi 7 are integrated, but the USB port is limited to 2.0 speed.

9th place - Apple iPhone 16e

The iPhone 16e is a decent compact phone (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Apple iPhone 16e

The iPhone 16e is Apple's most affordable model of the current range. Equipped with the powerful A18 chip, a 6.1-inch OLED display (60 Hz) and a 48 MP main camera, it is aimed at users who are looking for an up-to-date iPhone without paying extra for premium features. The design is reminiscent of the iPhone 14, with a high-quality finish, compact and lightweight. However, features such as Dynamic Island, MagSafe, UWB or additional camera lenses are missing.

The iPhone 16e is a well-balanced smartphone with strong performance and long battery life, but with clear compromises in terms of features and display technology.

The camera delivers very good results in daylight, but lacks an ultra-wide angle, macro and cinema mode. The OLED display impresses with high brightness and color accuracy, but suffers from a low refresh rate. The 4,005 mAh battery ensures long battery life and even outperforms the regular iPhone 16.

Its strengths also include 5G, Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.3 and precise GPS. With iOS 18.4 and Apple Intelligence, the iPhone 16e is future-proof and receives long-term updates.

10th place - Google Pixel 9a

The Pixel 9a is a decent compact phone (Image source: Daniel Schmidt)
Google Pixel 9a

The Google Pixel 9a presents itself as a strong mid-range smartphone with excellent battery life and a sophisticated design. Its 6.3-inch POLED display offers a refresh rate of up to 120 Hz and a high brightness of up to 2,700 cd/m², and impressed with its color fidelity and good display in the test

The performance is based on the Google Tensor G4, 8 GB RAM and either 128 GB or 256 GB UFS 3.1 memory. In everyday use, the device performs well, only slowing down slightly during graphics-heavy tasks. The battery with 5,100 mAh enables exceptional runtimes.

The Pixel 9a offers a balanced overall package consisting of a strong battery, high-quality display, good camera and long-term update security.

The camera system impresses with a 48 MP main camera and 13 MP ultra-wide-angle camera, delivers detailed photos and supports macro and night shots. Selfies are okay, but remain below flagship level. The features include IP68 protection, wireless charging, eSIM support and seven years of software updates. Weaknesses can be seen in the limited storage options without the possibility of expansion, slow charging time and partially limited GNSS indoors.

Best compact smartphones: Overview

Size comparison

166.7 mm / 6.56 in 75.2 mm / 2.96 in 6.5 mm / 0.2559 in 188 g0.4145 lbs154.7 mm / 6.09 in 73.3 mm / 2.89 in 8.9 mm / 0.3504 in 185.9 g0.4098 lbs152.8 mm / 6.02 in 72 mm / 2.83 in 8.5 mm / 0.3346 in 199 g0.4387 lbs152.8 mm / 6.02 in 72 mm / 2.83 in 8.5 mm / 0.3346 in 198 g0.4365 lbs152.3 mm / 6 in 71.2 mm / 2.8 in 8.08 mm / 0.3181 in 191 g0.4211 lbs150.83 mm / 5.94 in 71.76 mm / 2.83 in 7.99 mm / 0.3146 in 186 g0.4101 lbs149.6 mm / 5.89 in 71.5 mm / 2.81 in 8.25 mm / 0.3248 in 199 g0.4387 lbs147.6 mm / 5.81 in 71.6 mm / 2.82 in 7.8 mm / 0.3071 in 170 g0.3748 lbs146.7 mm / 5.78 in 71.5 mm / 2.81 in 7.8 mm / 0.3071 in 167 g0.3682 lbs146.9 mm / 5.78 in 70.5 mm / 2.78 in 7.2 mm / 0.2835 in 162 g0.3571 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Measurements

Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Response Times
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)
2.64 ?(1.538, 1.103)
0.86 ?(0.492, 0.3725)
2.9 ?(1.426, 1.473)
1.4 ?(0.7, 0.7)
0.64 ?(0.347, 0.2975)
3.28 ?(1.589, 1.693)
1.55 ?(0.9135, 0.6375)
1.51 ?(0.7815, 0.7275)
17.14 ?(0.4675, 16.67)
0.93 ?(0.4575, 0.474)
Response Time Black / White * (ms)
1.62 ?(0.8925, 0.729)
1.01 ?(0.5325, 0.4815)
2.31 ?(1.178, 1.136)
1.1 ?(0.5, 0.6)
1.05 ?(0.57, 0.4795)
1.04 ?(0.5135, 0.53)
1.04 ?(0.5335, 0.502)
1.35 ?(0.7575, 0.5955)
2.26 ?(1.058, 1.205)
0.81 ?(0.4405, 0.367)
PWM Frequency (Hz)
240
120
60
239
240
240
120
360
60
240
PWM Amplitude * (%)
13.54
17.54
25.75
15
13.64
16.62
22.22
16.22
15
12.82
Screen
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1301
1021
1101
1034
1349
2083
2063
1797
833
1978
Brightness (cd/m²)
1311
1018
1102
1034
1354
2016
1914
1802
837
1775
Brightness Distribution (%)
98
98
99
98
98
84
84
99
99
76
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.1
1.3
0.9
0.98
2.2
0.7
0.7
1
0.7
1.1
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.4
2.9
1.5
2.76
3.3
2
2.2
1.9
1.6
3
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
2.2
1.3
1.6
1.6
1.1
1.2
1.6
0.6
2.2
Gamma
2.01 109%
2.25 98%
2.16 102%
2.17 101%
2.06 107%
2.22 99%
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
2.19 100%
2.22 99%
CCT
6454 101%
6658 98%
6480 100%
6638 98%
6484 100%
6560 99%
6524 100%
6668 97%
6525 100%
6622 98%
Heat
Maximum Upper Side * (°C)
41.7
46.6
44.2
44.2
51.5
42.8
43.2
47.5
43.1
43
Maximum Bottom * (°C)
43.3
47
45.3
45.9
49.7
42.4
41.3
46.9
43.2
43.4
Idle Upper Side * (°C)
26.9
27.5
27.9
27
25.8
25.5
27
28.6
30.1
31.2
Idle Bottom * (°C)
27
26.6
25.6
27.3
25.3
24.6
25.5
27.5
28.9
29
Battery Runtime
Reader / Idle (h)
45.2
62.7
46.2
55.3
35
47.4
44.8
WiFi v1.3 (h)
18
22.8
18.3
16.4
18.9
17
16.5
22.6
23.2
21.2
Load (h)
3
5.4
3.6
3.6
3.9
4.1
4

* ... smaller is better

Benchmark scores

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3087 Points
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3001 Points
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
3377 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
3443 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2478 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1971 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1798 Points
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2234 Points
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
3338 Points
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1702 Points
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9776 Points
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9202 Points
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
8362 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
8524 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8098 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4820 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4501 Points
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7198 Points
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
8044 Points
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4453 Points
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
27327 Points
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24960 Points
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
16523 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
17967 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20027 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9476 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8998 Points
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12322 Points
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
14024 Points
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9302 Points
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6854 Points
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5995 Points
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
4255 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
4628 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5166 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2547 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2567 Points
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3465 Points
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
3330 Points
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2615 Points
Solar Bay Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11765 Points
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10764 Points
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
7453 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
7750 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11178 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5998 Points
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
6120 Points
Steel Nomad Light Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2362 Points
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
1803 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
1806 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2294 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1001 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1083 Points
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1323 Points
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
1517 Points
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1055 Points
GFXBench
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
279 fps
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
274 fps
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
165 fps
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
176.1 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
189 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
177 fps
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
140 fps
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
59.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
52.3 fps
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
69.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70 fps
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
50 fps
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
59.9 fps
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
59.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88 fps
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
59.2 fps
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20623 Points
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19192 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11823 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13948 Points
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14377 Points
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11398 Points
CrossMark
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1718 Points
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
1492 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
1455 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1021 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
951 Points
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
Productivity (sort by value)
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1392 Points
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
1477 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
1451 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1093 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1008 Points
Creativity (sort by value)
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1339 Points
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
1703 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
1680 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
986 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
955 Points
Responsiveness (sort by value)
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6805 Points
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
1034 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
951 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
921 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
804 Points
Antutu v10 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1975467 Points
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2677100 Points
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
1632305 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
1867306 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1716184 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1139380 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1022007 Points
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1404873 Points
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
1432050 Points
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
844082 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95809 Points
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78653 Points
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
96054 Points
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
98997 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65875 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60566 Points
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56737 Points
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49231 Points
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
97104 Points
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52224 Points
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3982.43 MB/s
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3934.92 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4044.67 MB/s
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1717.9 MB/s
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1584.56 MB/s
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1867.08 MB/s
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1688.82 MB/s
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2256.71 MB/s
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3889.06 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2981.82 MB/s
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
253.53 MB/s
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
256.48 MB/s
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1756.13 MB/s
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
853.5 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
299.89 MB/s
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
296.95 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
366.98 MB/s
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
218.41 MB/s
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
226.41 MB/s
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
300.78 MB/s
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
241.03 MB/s
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51.76 MB/s
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
360.36 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
143.67 MB/s
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
261.55 MB/s
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
266.19 MB/s
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
357.33 MB/s
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
261.8 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1167 (1006min - 1197max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
871 (785min - 951max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
776 (764min - 786max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
921 (876min - 946max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
799 (780min - 816max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
795 (680min - 916max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
911 (857min - 930max) MBit/s
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
877 (552min - 950max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
727 (715min - 739max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
920 (458min - 947max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
807 (348min - 873max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1058 (518min - 1295max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
876 (445min - 968max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
928 (893min - 950max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
622 (487min - 659max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
868 (438min - 950max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
955 (858min - 990max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
955 (739min - 994max) MBit/s
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
880 (537min - 977max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
765 (732min - 797max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1210 (998min - 1383max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1386 (628min - 1900max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
1401 (1319min - 1418max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
969 (436min - 1159max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1830 (1666min - 1889max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1855 (1826min - 1894max) MBit/s
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1686 (837min - 1911max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
780 (731min - 867max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1201 (1184min - 1221max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1793 (1671min - 1841max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
1257 (1214min - 1281max) MBit/s
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
1387 (1360min - 1402max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1602 (1387min - 1829max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1851 (886min - 1889max) MBit/s
Vivo X200 FE
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1820 (928min - 1882max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
833 (789min - 843max) MBit/s
PUBG Mobile - HD (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S25
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.7 (47min - 61max) fps
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
58.9 (47min - 60max) fps
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 128 GB NVMe
57 (50min - 60max) fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7
Xclipse 950, Exynos 2500, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.8 (47min - 61max) fps
Google Pixel 9
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.8 (41min - 61max) fps
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
58.5 (45min - 60max) fps
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.8 (39min - 60max) fps
Read all 15 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Ranking: Best compact smartphones reviewed by Notebookcheck
Daniel Schmidt, 2025-08-21 (Update: 2025-09-21)