Notebookcheck Logo

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop is a mobile graphics card from the Blackwell family for laptops, unveiled at CES 2025. It is based on the GB205 chip, featuring 5,888 shader/CUDA cores clocked at 847-1995 MHz (depending on the model) and 12 GB of GDDR7 memory with a 192-bit interface. The model also has 46 RT-cores, as well as 80 ROPs.

As a novelty, Blackwell offers support for Multi-Frame Generation (MFG) with DLSS4, thanks to the 5th generation of Tensor cores.

Performance

As our tests show, the RTX 5070 Ti laptop is 23% faster than the standard RTX 5070 laptop on average in benchmarks. Gaming performance delta is lower; here, the RTX 5070 Ti laptop is only 15% faster on average than the RTX 5070 laptop. The desktop counterpart, the RTX 5070 Ti, is 34% faster. Furthermore, with the mentioned Multi-Frame Generation (MFG) you can get impressive frame rates, but keep latency in mind.

Power consumption

The GB205 chip is manufactured at TSMC in the 4N (custom 4NP 5nm) process. The maximum allowed TGP for this model is 140 watts (including Dynamic Boost).

GeForce RTX 5000 Laptop GPU Series

GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop compare 10496 @ 0.99 - 1.52 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop compare 8192 @ 0.98 - 2.29 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 5888 @ 0.85 - 2.22 GHz192 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop compare 4608 @ 2.24 - 2.52 GHz128 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop compare 3328 @ 0.95 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 24000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop compare 2560 @ 1.02 - 2.66 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGN22-X7
ArchitectureBlackwell
Pipelines5888 - unified
TMUs184
ROPs64
Raytracing Cores46
Tensor / AI Cores184
Core Speed847 - 2220 (Boost) MHz
CacheL1: 5.8 MB, L2: 48 MB
Memory Speed32000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR7
Max. Amount of Memory12 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth677 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4
Power Consumption115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm
PCIe5
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.1b
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement02.01.2025

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
16.7 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 13812     avg: 16409     median: 16839.5 (45%)     max: 17747 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 14945     avg: 16838     median: 17225 (35%)     max: 17981 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
882191 Points (89%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
659227 Points (77%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 61167     avg: 73232     median: 74060 (70%)     max: 82832 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 134306     avg: 166921     median: 155373 (38%)     max: 223650 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 32615     avg: 36726     median: 36215 (55%)     max: 42125 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 39170     avg: 44122     median: 44603.5 (41%)     max: 47933 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
760743 Points (84%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 28297     avg: 31578     median: 33562 (39%)     max: 33585 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
82266 Points (78%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
182827 Points (70%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 37247     avg: 44080     median: 45294 (55%)     max: 47299 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 50966     avg: 56687     median: 56824 (43%)     max: 61651 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 121273     avg: 122137     median: 122137 (35%)     max: 123001 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 122701     avg: 128541     median: 128540 (70%)     max: 134380 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
68580 Points (75%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 60964     avg: 65414     median: 65214 (85%)     max: 70064 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
198.1 fps (60%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 24     avg: 25.7     median: 24.5 (4%)     max: 33 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 13     avg: 14.8     median: 15 (6%)     max: 16 Seconds
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
92.2 fps (23%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
18.5 fps (3%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
190 fps (33%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
98.6 fps (25%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
188 fps (51%)
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
29 fps (26%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
90.3 fps (36%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
171 fps (28%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
284 fps (43%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
92.9 fps (25%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
14.1 fps (2%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
91.3 fps (16%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
36.2 fps (6%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
202 fps (23%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
22.6 fps (7%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
152 fps (22%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
92.7 fps (10%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
166 fps (26%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
33.6 fps (4%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
50.8 fps (14%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
503 fps (54%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
26 fps (4%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
85.1 fps (29%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
39.1 fps (19%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
76.8 fps (20%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
24671 points (18%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
236.6 fps (78%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 271     avg: 311.9     median: 327 (19%)     max: 335.41 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
184.7 fps (69%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
403.5 fps (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
960 fps (71%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
859 fps (81%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
983 fps (21%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
1084 fps (45%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
3321 fps (26%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 68.3     avg: 430     median: 114.4 (3%)     max: 1863 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (1%)     max: 6.84 fps
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 67235     avg: 145675     median: 155654 (41%)     max: 178141 points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 7769     avg: 58670     median: 40229 (10%)     max: 166112 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 7623     avg: 7789     median: 7788.5 (28%)     max: 7954 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 15570     avg: 15671     median: 15671 (27%)     max: 15772 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 40170     avg: 41323     median: 41323 (34%)     max: 42476 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 163.3     avg: 187.7     median: 185.3 (25%)     max: 203 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
221 Watt (31%)
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
0.7 fps per Watt (58%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 221     avg: 245.1     median: 245 (68%)     max: 285 Watt
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 217     avg: 241     median: 242 (31%)     max: 278 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.4258     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (2%)     max: 0.509 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
50.4 dB(A) (72%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
181.7 188.4 242 260 ~ 218 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
181.2 184.5 217 243 ~ 206 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
168.3 170.8 171.9 225 ~ 184 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.3 35 35.3 42.1 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
18 20 21.3 25 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
32 36.9 39.3 45.9 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
69.7
64.7
61
85.3
low 1920x1080
93  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
77.5 94.8 94.9 ~ 89 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
67.3 84.3 86.1 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
65 82.7 85.4 ~ 78 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
45.7 57.9 59.1 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
61 79.1 82.5 ~ 74 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
116  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
86.9 94 112.6 ~ 98 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
78.2 81.8 90.8 ~ 84 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
40 42.9 44 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
28 30.1 30.9 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
41.9 44.7 47.4 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
81 85 90 93 94 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76 77 84 84 89 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63 66 70 72 77 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47 52 52 53 55 55 58 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
40 41 42 44 45 47 48 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31 32 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
41 44 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
49 51 58 59 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 2560x1440
78
70
84
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 3840x2160
56
low 1920x1080
443  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
192.1 212 261 ~ 222 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
187.5 202 213 ~ 201 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
129.1 141.9 144 ~ 138 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
93.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
84  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
67.2 70.8 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
54.7 55 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.4  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
66.6 70.6 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
189.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
145.2 152.4 153.5 ~ 150 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
118.8 125.2 126.7 ~ 124 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
84.1 88.2 90 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
59 62.7 65 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
79.2 86.1 94.7 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
126.7 144.4 158.1 ~ 143 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
93.5 102.4 118.6 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
82.2 89.9 101 105.1 107.4 ~ 97 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
63.5 68.4 77.6 80.8 82.5 ~ 75 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
31.7 43.1 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
91.1 96 99.9 ~ 96 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame Generation 2560x1440
20.2
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
med. 1920x1080
84.6 89.8 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
73.6 76.6 ~ 75 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
62 65.5 ~ 64 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
46.9 49.9 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
100.8 104.6 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
138 152 159 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
135 142 150 ~ 142 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
100 100 121 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
94 94 97 112 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
65 68 68 89 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
37  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
58  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
98  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
99.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
85.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
67.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
48  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
61.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
90.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
88.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
87.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
73.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
84.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080 cinem.
86.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
70.7 82.3 ~ 77 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
66.5 72.2 ~ 69 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
55.9 60.3 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440 cinem.
40.3 43.5 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440 cinem.
56.8 59.6 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
ultra, RT ultra, DLSS, FG RR 2560x1440 cinem.
64.9
low 1280x720 cinem.
84.7
low 1920x1080
133  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
100  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
33  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
49  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
192
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 2560x1440
59
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
247 322 ~ 285 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
226 236 350 ~ 271 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
217 223 232 250 291 ~ 243 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
87.2 93 98.7 106.4 107.6 108 114.8 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
53.2 60.4 66.4 68.5 69.4 71.2 72.1 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28.1 35.6 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
38.6 61.4 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
78.1 88.5 94.1 98.4 106 115.8 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
113.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
77.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
40  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
59.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
106.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
102  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
83.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
60.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
83.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
131.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
97.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
96  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
72.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
93.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
74.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
143.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
141.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
141.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
101.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
358  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
358  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
357  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
126  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
114  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
98  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
74  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
47  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
183
low 1920x1080
93.2 93.2 108.9 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87.2 88.3 103.5 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.5 81.7 95.8 96 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
54.5 54.6 63.9 64.5 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing 3840x2160
13.1
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS 3840x2160
22.9
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 2x 3840x2160
39.8
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 4x 3840x2160
72.4
low 1920x1080
521.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
317.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
200.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
161.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
127.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
641.8
med. 1920x1080
316  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
265  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
222  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
174.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
131.6 149.4 150.4 161.7 175.1 188.6 203 ~ 166 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
127.4 134.4 138.5 139.8 156.8 166.9 169.2 178.7 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
115.9 117 126.4 133.9 135.4 138 143.2 144.6 154.1 ~ 134 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
104.9 105.4 115.7 119.6 124.1 126.7 129 129.9 132.4 135.5 ~ 122 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
68.4 71.7 75 80.8 81 81.6 82.6 84.3 87.5 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35.9 37.1 37.3 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
57.4  fps    + Compare
4K FSR 3840x2160
33.6  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
81.5 83.6 91.2 91.6 93.9 94.2 102.1 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
206
157
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
60.7
Ultra Preset (FSR2 on) 1920x1080
157.7
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
17.7
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
104.9
122.6
104.9
99.1
110.5
120.5
116.2
113.2
103.9
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset (no DLSS, no FG) 3840x2160
3.7
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality (no FG) 3840x2160
19.4
19.9
18.9
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation (M)FG 2x 3840x2160
34
35.8
31
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation MFG 4x 3840x2160
61.8
66.8
54
low 1920x1080
167.7 175.8 175.9 176.3 202.6 ~ 180 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
129.1 131.1 150.1 154.7 172.8 179.1 188 ~ 158 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
108.1 111.1 131.7 137.6 151.9 154.2 161 ~ 137 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
108.3 131.2 131.7 138.9 147.4 153.9 156 157 158.6 246.1 ~ 153 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
91 93.9 97.6 99.1 103 108.6 109.2 112.4 175.5 ~ 110 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
46.6 59.2 91.4 ~ 66 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
72.4 94.6 102.5 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
130  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
245
233
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
170.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
150.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
136  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
135.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
116.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
164.6
Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR TAA 1920x1080
102.4
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
182.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
164.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
133.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
86.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
76.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
392 403 438 483 585 643 ~ 491 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
201 338 348 362 464 479 ~ 365 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
156.5 294 308 328 381 403 ~ 312 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
136.4 266 276 303 337 347 353 ~ 288 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
103.8 198.9 209 228 229 246 250 ~ 209 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
131.7 138.1 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
174  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
155  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
145  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
142  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
144  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
170
low 1280x720
107.9 121.8 138.7 144.1 155.1 155.8 156.9 165 173.7 ~ 147 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
99.8 110.2 114.7 123.7 136.4 140.1 142.2 144.1 145.4 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
80.7 90.6 101.6 106.6 115.5 116 117.5 118.3 124.6 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
91.8 108.2 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
195.7 213 217 223 231 234 ~ 219 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
164.7 180.2 183.4 197.6 208 216 221 230 ~ 200 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
135.8 144.3 147.8 156.8 163.1 166 167.2 173.1 180.1 181.4 ~ 162 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
107.6 109 119.7 125.2 126.2 127 129.5 132.4 134.2 139.2 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
74.1 77.5 78.8 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
166.9 170.3 209 213 223 223 228 256 263 ~ 217 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
153.7 155.7 183.9 186 192.9 198.2 199.7 217 222 ~ 190 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
145.7 152.7 175.8 178.8 185.5 189.3 189.7 213 215 ~ 183 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
134.2 141.1 164.7 165.4 171.4 174 174.8 193 193.9 ~ 168 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
170.7 173.1 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
686  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
517  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
341  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
154 176.2 ~ 165 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
130  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
394
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
185.8 187.6 ~ 187 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
185.4 185.6 186 187.6 ~ 186 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
164.5 179 180.2 181 184.7 ~ 178 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
124.7 144.8 147.6 149 152.9 161 161 164.6 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
117.3 123.8 138.8 139.1 143 147.3 147.3 151.4 ~ 139 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
124.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
83.3
62.5
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
184.1
187.2
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
186.3
187.9
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 252182061843621
Doom: The Dark Ages9389797854
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered11698844230
Assassin's Creed Shadows898270534432
Civilization 7443222201138
Monster Hunter Wilds93.184695533.4
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2189.31501248762
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle143105977537
Stalker 287756448
Call of Duty Black Ops 6150142107997337
Until Dawn99.385.967.748
Space Marine 290.988.887.773.1
Star Wars Outlaws86.877695842
Black Myth: Wukong133100784433
F1 242852712431026632
Senua's Saga Hellblade 277.25540
Ghost of Tsushima106.510283.860.7
Horizon Forbidden West131.197.59672.6
Dragon's Dogma 28374.8
Helldivers 2143.8141.7141.4101.6
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown358358357356
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora126114987447
Alan Wake 29893885933.6
Total War Pharaoh521.4317.1200.2161.4127.4
Counter-Strike 2316265222174.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty1661511341227937
Baldur's Gate 318015813715311066
Far Cry 6170.9150.2136135.7116.7
Anno 1800182.4164.8133.586.476.6
Strange Brigade491365312288209135
Far Cry 5174155145142144
X-Plane 11.11147129108100
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark21920016212577
Dota 2 Reborn217190183168172
The Witcher 3686517341165130
GTA V187186178151139124.2
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


6
20


13
21

1
16
18

5
13
12
1
11
13
9

7
3
3

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 29. 20:28:51

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 29 Sep 2025 12:27:33 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.032s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.032s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12926 +0.028s ... 0.06s

#8 got single benchmarks 12926 +0.043s ... 0.103s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.103s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +1.304s ... 1.407s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.407s

#12 Got 581 rows for game benchmarks. +0.246s ... 1.653s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.653s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.026s ... 1.679s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.362s ... 2.041s

#16 return log +0.006s ... 2.047s

Notebook reviews with Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop graphics card

The cheapest Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti laptop GPU - XMG Focus 17 M25 gaming laptop review

The cheapest Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti laptop GPU - XMG Focus 17 M25 gaming laptop review

The new XMG Focus 17 M25 is the most affordable way to get the new Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti laptop GPU. The 17-inch gaming laptop is out now starting at €1,84...
Intel Core i9-13900HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | 17.30" | 2.8 kg
Chuwi Gamebook

Gaming notebook with Ryzen 9 9955HX and RTX 5070 Ti laptop GPU - Chuwi Gamebook review

The Chuwi Gamebook has a high-quality casing design with more powerful components. This brings the laptop closer to higher-class gaming models, both functionall...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | 16.00" | 2.5 kg
RTX 5070 Ti in overdrive: Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 gaming laptop review

RTX 5070 Ti in overdrive: Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 gaming laptop review

Medion's Erazer Major 16 X1 pairs a robust chassis with rock-solid performance driven by the RTX 5070 Ti. In our review, the 16-inch gaming laptop goes head-to-...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | 16.00" | 2.5 kg
The most powerful RTX 5070 Ti gamer so far - Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10H OLED review

The most powerful RTX 5070 Ti gamer so far - Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10H OLED review

What does it take to make one of last year's standout gaming laptops an even better new model? Maintain the strengths and work on the weaknesses! That's exactly...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | 16.00" | 2.4 kg
MSI Vector 16 HX AI review: A feature-rich gaming laptop powered by RTX 5070 Ti

MSI Vector 16 HX AI review: A feature-rich gaming laptop powered by RTX 5070 Ti

With the Vector 16 HX AI, MSI delivers a compelling gaming notebook powered by cutting-edge Intel (Arrow Lake) and Nvidia (Blackwell) hardware. However, a close...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | 16.00" | 2.6 kg

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 5070 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » Slim gamer impresses with RTX 5070 Ti laptop - Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 in review

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » RTX 5070 Ti laptop GPU almost as fast as RTX 5080 laptop GPU - Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 review

MSI Vector A18 HX A9W: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 18.00", 3.5 kg
  Review » MSI Vector A18 HX A9W laptop review: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the way to go

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25): Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » The RTX 5070 Ti Laptop and up to 128 GB RAM inside a gaming/workstation hybrid - XMG Pro 16 (E25) laptop review

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Engineering Sample: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  Review » GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop vs. RTX 5070 Laptop - The successors to the RTX 4070 Laptop in review

Asus ROG Strix G18 G815LR: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G18 G815LR

Alienware 16 Area-51, RTX 5070 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16 Area-51, RTX 5070 Ti

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 Ti

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 5070 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 5070 Ti

Chuwi Gamebook, R9 9955HX: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Chuwi Gamebook, R9 9955HX

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CR: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CR

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LR: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LR

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti

MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG, Ultra 9 275HX: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG, Ultra 9 275HX

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614FR: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G614FR

MSI Stealth A18 AI+ A3XWHG: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 18.00", 2.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth A18 AI+ A3XWHG

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403WR: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403WR

MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG

Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 with RTX 5070 Ti and OLED display gets $400 price cut

MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
   » Discounted MSI Vector 16 HX AI with free AAA games: RTX 5070 Ti-powered gaming laptop is now $250 off

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2025) with RTX 5070 Ti, Ryzen AI 9 HX and 3K OLED hits lowest price yet

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 M25: Intel Core i9-13900HX, 17.30", 2.8 kg
   » XMG's Focus 17 M25 with the RTX 5070 Ti is currently the best value gaming laptop

Chuwi Gamebook, R9 9955HX: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
   » Chuwi ventures into gaming - powerful notebook with AMD Ryzen 9 and Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti laptop GPU reviewed

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » Lenovo Legion Pro 5 Gen 10 with RTX 5070, Core Ultra 7 and 2.5K OLED gets huge 38% discount

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14: OLED gaming laptop with RTX 5070 Ti has never been cheaper

MSI Vector A18 HX A9W: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 18.00", 3.5 kg
   » These are the slowest and fastest laptops with GeForce RTX 5070 graphics currently available

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » Lenovo Legion Pro 5i 16 vs Legion Pro 7i 16: We reviewed both

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » Verdict on the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16: Powerful, but still slower than its smaller G14 sibling

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 5070 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » Verdict on the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16: Powerful, but still slower than its smaller G14 sibling

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » The Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 is unrivaled since the Razer Blade 14 is limited to the RTX 5070 Laptop

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25): Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
   » RTX 4080 Laptop performance for RTX 4070 Laptop money - XMG Pro 16 with the new 5070 Ti Laptop GPU shows strong performance in our review

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » Lenovo and other laptop makers abuse their control centers by placing ads, as seen on the Legion Pro 5

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Adreno 840 *
Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-01- 5)