Notebookcheck Logo

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop is a dedicated graphics card from the Blackwell family for laptops, which was presented by Team Green in June 2025. It uses the GB207 chip.

Like the RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, the GPU offers 2,560 unified shaders (CUDA cores) combined with a 128-bit memory bus for 8 GB GDDR7 graphics memory.

Other features of the GPU include native 5th generation ray tracing cores, PCIe 5 support, DisplayPort 2.1a and 440 TOPS AI performance (thanks to the built-in Tensor cores).

The performance without DLSS frame generation should be similar to the old RTX 4060 Laptop GPU laptop GPU. The RTX 5060 is 21 - 22% faster at 115 W (incl. Dynamic Boost) in 3DMark tests (via Videocardz). As usual, performance is heavily dependent on power consumption (TGP) and cooling. Therefore, there will also be significantly slower models in laptops.

The chip is produced at TSMC using the 4nm process (4N). The power consumption (TGP) is specified at 35-100 watts (115 watts incl. Dynamic Boost 2.0).

GeForce RTX 5000 Laptop GPU Series

GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop compare 10496 @ 0.99 - 1.52 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop compare 8192 @ 0.98 - 2.29 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop compare 5888 @ 0.85 - 2.22 GHz192 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop compare 4608 @ 2.24 - 2.52 GHz128 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop compare 3328 @ 0.95 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 24000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 2560 @ 1.02 - 2.66 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGN22-X2
ArchitectureBlackwell
Pipelines2560 - unified
TMUs80
ROPs32
Raytracing Cores20
Tensor / AI Cores80
Core Speed1020 - 2662 (Boost) MHz
CacheL1: 2.5 MB, L2: 32 MB
Memory Speed14000 effective = 1750 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth224 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2
Power Consumption100 Watt (35 - 100 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm
PCIe5
Displays4 Displays (max.), DisplayPort 2.1a
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement02.01.2025
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com
PredecessorNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
10.5 pt (32%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
9799 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
9784 Points (20%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
52328 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
149542 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
23840 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
28040 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
436477 Points (48%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
28133 Points (34%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
33119 Points (25%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
76534 Points (22%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
82905 Points (45%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
47989 Points (63%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
50 Seconds (7%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
29 Seconds (11%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
15349 points (11%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
135.1 fps (44%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 166.8     avg: 173.9     median: 173.9 (10%)     max: 180.9 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
100.4 fps (38%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
232.1 fps (42%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
609 fps (45%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
104.6 fps (3%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
91972 points (24%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
10922 points (3%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
5328 Samples/s (19%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
11437 Samples/s (20%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
20725 points (17%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
150.7 Watt (20%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
173.4 Watt (48%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
171.9 Watt (22%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 25

F1 25

2025
med. 1920x1080
157  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
132  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
5  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
58.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
52.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
31.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
49.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
52.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
48.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
13.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
26.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
29  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
90.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
73.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
51.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
36.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
50.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
52.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
9.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
med. 1920x1080
56.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
39.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
29  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
62.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
79.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
54.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
41.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
30.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
39.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
79.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
75.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
70.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
49.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
65.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
46.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
41.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
33  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440 cinem.
23.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440 cinem.
32.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
50.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
35.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
24.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
39.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
75.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
68.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
54.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
39.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
55.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
86.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
64.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
45.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
58.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
98.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
87.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
76.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
47.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
69.1
med. 1920x1080
108.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
87.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
86.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
med. 1920x1080
278  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
220  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
189.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
132  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
98.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
88.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
77.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
139.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
102  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
73.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
165.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
137.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
131  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
119.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
med. 1366x768
177.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
170.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
117.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
93.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 25157132155
Doom: The Dark Ages58.452.65131.9
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered52.248.22513.4
Assassin's Creed Shadows51432925
Kingdom Come Deliverance 290.573.651.636.8
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle52.115.69.58
Stalker 256.44839.929
Until Dawn79.954.241.330.4
Space Marine 279.275.670.849.5
Star Wars Outlaws46.541.23323.2
Senua's Saga Hellblade 250.435.124.2
Ghost of Tsushima75.968.254.539.7
Horizon Forbidden West86.264.16245.7
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty98.187.776.947.2
Baldur's Gate 3108.487.386.360
Strange Brigade278220189.6132
X-Plane 11.1198.588.577.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark139.310273.6
Dota 2 Reborn165.7137.7131119.9
GTA V177.2170.4117.693.7
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1
1

6
8
5

8
8
4
4
6
6
1
7
7
3
1



For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 30. 20:33:18

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 30 Sep 2025 20:03:30 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12923 +0.03s ... 0.06s

#8 got single benchmarks 12923 +0.016s ... 0.076s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.076s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.56s ... 0.636s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.636s

#12 Got 89 rows for game benchmarks. +0.019s ... 0.656s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.656s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.011s ... 0.667s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.144s ... 0.811s

#16 return log +0.005s ... 0.817s

Notebook reviews with Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop graphics card

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 with RTX 5050 in review

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 Review: Evaluating the RTX 5050 Laptop's worth as a lower mid-range GPU

The Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 is the first notebook based on the GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop to land in our editorial office. Our review tests the RTX 5050 Laptop t...
Intel Core 5 210H | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | 17.30" | 2.7 kg

Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA63H: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Gaming A16 GA63H

Acer Nitro V15 ANV15-52: Intel Core i7-13620H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V15 ANV15-52

LG gram Pro AI 17 17Z90TR: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 17.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » LG gram Pro AI 17 17Z90TR

Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UH: AMD Ryzen 7 260, 18.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A18 FA808UH

Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608JHR: Intel Core i7-14650HX, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608JHR

Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608JHV: Intel Core i5-13450HX, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608JH

Asus V16 V3607VH: Intel Core 7 240H, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus V16 V3607VH

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Adreno 840 *
Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-12-30)