Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design is a mobile graphics card for laptops that is based on the Turing architecture (TU116 chip). It is designed for thin and light laptops and about 10-15% slower than a regular GTX 1660 Ti for laptops (depending on the cooling capabilities). According to the specifications, the Max-Q variant clocks 22% slower for the base speed and 16% for the boost speed.

Compared to the faster RTX 2000 GPUs (e.g. RTX 2060), the 1660Ti integrates no Raytracing or Tensor cores. The performance is similar to the old GTX 1070 (Max-Q) but at a reduced TGP of 60 Watt (versus 80 of the laptop version 115 Watt of the desktop version). 

In April 2020 Nvidia refreshed the GTX 1660 Ti with the new codename N18E-G0-A1 with similar specs and pin compatible to the refreshed RTX chips (e.g., RTX 2070 Super Mobile).

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal.

Nvidia specifies a power consumption of 60 Watt TGP (Total Graphics Power) and therefore 20 Watts lower than a normal (Max-P) 1660Ti for laptops. Therefore, the Max-Q variant is well suited for thin and light gaming laptops. The TU116 chip is manufactured in 12nm FFN at TSMC.

GeForce GTX 1600 Series

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) compare 1536 @ 1.5 - 1.77 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) compare 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compare 1536 @ 1.46 - 1.59 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) compare 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) compare 1280 @ 1.53 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 1536 @ 1.14 - 1.34 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compare 1024 @ 1.35 - 1.49 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) compare 896 @ 1.49 - 1.67 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile compare 1024 @ 1.38 - 1.56 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compare 1024 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 1.02 - 1.25 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
CodenameN18E-G0
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1536 - unified
Core Speed1140 - 1335 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed12000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory6 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption60 Watt
technology12 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement23.04.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
6.1 pt (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 4547     avg: 5197     median: 5072 (15%)     max: 6395 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 4867     avg: 5089     median: 5084.5 (13%)     max: 5440 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 16807     avg: 29350     median: 33027 (35%)     max: 39942 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 38321     avg: 63736     median: 63086 (17%)     max: 89505 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 10103     avg: 11548     median: 11615 (20%)     max: 12739 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 12903     avg: 13356     median: 13355 (15%)     max: 13870 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 12279     avg: 15364     median: 15913 (22%)     max: 17377 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 17010     avg: 17711     median: 17439 (15%)     max: 18653 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 24029     avg: 28247     median: 25211 (33%)     max: 38536 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 78.2     avg: 100.5     median: 96.9 (6%)     max: 130.7 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 94.2     avg: 104.8     median: 106.9 (24%)     max: 121 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4388     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (47%)     max: 0.537 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 34     avg: 43.4     median: 43.7 (70%)     max: 53.8 dB(A)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
55.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low-End TAAAA 1920x1080
57
low 1280x720
119  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
78  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
136.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
81.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
78.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
219  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
130  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
214.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
130.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
168.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
101.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
95.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
93.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
176.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
121.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
98.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
90.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
87.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
115.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
71.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
91.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
95.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
135.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
88  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
62.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Maximum Settings with Raytracing T2X Filmic SMAA 1920x1080
24.3
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
112.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
86.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
58.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
83 114 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
68 72 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
65 66 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48 51 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
147.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
145.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
141  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
139.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
87 116.5 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
72.1 81.5 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.9 54.9 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.5 42.3 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
158.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
155 183 ~ 169 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
119 140 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
106 117 ~ 112 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
71 77 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
144.1 209.4 ~ 177 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76.5 93.1 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54.7 57.1 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.1 41.6 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
146.4 154.7 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
70.9 76.2 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58.7 65.8 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
58.2 64.8 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
59.6 87.9 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
58.7 83.2 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.3 64.1 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26 33.2 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
110 142 ~ 126 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
80 87 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66 69 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49 50 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
181.2 194.2 ~ 188 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
102.6 139.9 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88.7 103.2 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57.3 59.2 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anthem

Anthem

2019
low 1280x720
53.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
97  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
71  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
83.5 96.6 129.5 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53.9 60 66.5 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.1 46.6 49.1 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.1 36.8 38.3 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
144 144 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
105.3 133.9 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
90.1 99.6 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
89 99.6 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
135.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
85.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
77.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
94.3 117.4 152 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
74.6 82.9 102.6 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
65.9 77.5 92.2 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
61 73 85 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
37.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset DXR 1920x1080
29.1
low 1280x720
115.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
83.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
48 64 90 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43 56 71 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39 51 60 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33 42 44 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
62 82 113 126 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53 57 83 85 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52 53 74 75 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49 49 64 67 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
66.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
59.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
68 103 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54 84 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53 79 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50 74 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
59
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
376.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
215.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
117.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
60.6 68.8 93.7 102.3 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.5 62.9 80.4 88.1 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.8 55.4 67.8 75.4 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
125.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
77.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
78.4 106.4 131 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60.3 70.3 74.1 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.9 50 54.6 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
138  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
92.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
89.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
78.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
91  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
82  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
61  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
206.7 247.4 ~ 227 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
160.8 212.1 ~ 186 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
141.7 173.7 ~ 158 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
130.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
78.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
193.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
140.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
116  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
42.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
93.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
64.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
232.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
200.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
163.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
148.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
93.3 113 119 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
88.7 102.1 112 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
81.4 93.8 106 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
75.7 86.3 103 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
med (1/3) 1920x1080
93.3
low 1280x720
89  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
138.4 144.5 186.8 243 256.8 257.5 258.3 ~ 212 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
111.4 142.6 162.6 166.4 166.5 173.3 ~ 154 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64.4 83.9 89.9 92.1 94.5 95.2 95.3 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44.8 48.5 48.8 51.3 52.2 53.1 53.2 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
30.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
23.5
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
161.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
151.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
114.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
183.4 224.2 263.2 294 331.3 ~ 259 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
195.6 249.5 271.9 282 ~ 250 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
180.9 226.9 246.8 259.9 ~ 229 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
102.3 107.4 119.2 126.3 130 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
343.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
322.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
296.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
166.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Flight Simulator 202055.149.437.125.3
Horizon Zero Dawn119786551
Death Stranding136.187.781.378.4
F1 202021913011279
Gears Tactics214.7130.279.956.1
Doom Eternal168.9101.795.493.4
Hunt Showdown176.881.263.3
Escape from Tarkov121.298.390.587.7
Red Dead Redemption 2115.171.747.229.4
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order91.578.172.4
Need for Speed Heat95.88373.966.9
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019135.28872.662.6
GRID 2019112.986.57258.7
Ghost Recon Breakpoint99706650
FIFA 20147.9145.4141139.3
Borderlands 3102775442
Control158.363.747.1
F1 201916913011274
Total War: Three Kingdoms177855641
Rage 2151746262
Anno 180074715530
The Division 2126846850
Dirt Rally 2.01881219658
Anthem53.648.948.846.4
Far Cry New Dawn97817871
Metro Exodus103604737
Apex Legends1441209594
Darksiders III135.685.877.472.8
Battlefield V12187797337.9
Call of Duty Black Ops 4115.287.984.683.1
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey67575040
Shadow of the Tomb Raider96706457
Monster Hunter World66.959.359.550.8
Far Cry 58669666230
World of Tanks enCore376.8215.9117.3
X-Plane 11.11817162
Kingdom Come: Deliverance125.691.777.353.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1056850
Fortnite13892.289.578.6
Middle-earth: Shadow of War91827261
Rocket League227186158
Ghost Recon Wildlands130.478.172.441.5
Overwatch193.7140.7116
Ashes of the Singularity42.440.7
Rise of the Tomb Raider93.772.764.5
Rainbow Six Siege232.8200.1163.6148.8
Metal Gear Solid V606060
Dota 2 Reborn1081019488
Batman: Arkham Knight896951
The Witcher 3212154885030.9
GTA V161.3151.5114.659.6
BioShock Infinite259250229117
Tomb Raider343.8322.9296.9166.1
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
21
28

5
31
13

12
34
6
2
19
23
3




3

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 22. 10:50:25

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:40:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.047s ... 0.048s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.048s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9832 +0.03s ... 0.078s

#7 got single benchmarks 9832 +0.035s ... 0.114s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.114s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.658s ... 0.772s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.772s

#11 Got 341 rows for game benchmarks. +0.03s ... 0.803s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.803s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.038s ... 0.84s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.814s ... 2.654s

#15 return log +0.049s ... 2.703s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q graphics card

HP Pavilion Gaming 15 in review: Inexpensive gaming laptop with a lot of power under the hood

HP Pavilion Gaming 15 in review: Inexpensive gaming laptop with a lot of power under the hood

The Pavilion's hardware (Ryzen 7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q) brings all modern computer games smoothly onto the 15.6-inch matte screen (IPS, Full HD, 144 ...
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 15.60" | 2 kg
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS Debut: Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU Laptop Review

AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS Debut: Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU Laptop Review

Even the slowest mobile Ryzen 7 H-series Renoir CPU is able outperform most laptops running on the latest 10th gen Core i7 Comet Lake-H CPU. Though raw CPU perf...
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 15.60" | 2.1 kg
Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 Convertible Review: Still great, but is it better than its predecessor?

Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 Convertible Review: Still great, but is it better than its predecessor?

We are pushing the almost unrivaled 15-inch convertible Surface Book 3 through our various test scenarios. Both the tablet hardware (i7 Ice Lake, G7 graphics) a...
Intel Core i7-1065G7 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 15.00" | 1.9 kg
HP Pavilion Gaming 15 in Review: HP's 15.6-inch laptop combines gaming prowess and stamina

HP Pavilion Gaming 15 in Review: HP's 15.6-inch laptop combines gaming prowess and stamina

The HP Pavilion Gaming 15 runs all current games smoothly and displays them on its matte 15.6-inch screen (FHD, IPS). The laptop is well-equipped: 16 GB of RAM ...
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 15.60" | 2.3 kg
HP Gaming Pavilion 15 Laptop Review: A powerful yet pleasingly quiet gaming laptop

HP Gaming Pavilion 15 Laptop Review: A powerful yet pleasingly quiet gaming laptop

The HP Gaming Pavilion 15 handles all modern games with ease on its matte 15.6-inch 1080p display thanks to its powerful hardware. The device can even make use ...
Intel Core i7-9750H | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 15.60" | 2.4 kg

HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl: Intel Core i7-9750H, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 17 Review: Finally, a Quiet Gaming Laptop

Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU: AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G GA502DU (Ryzen 7 3750H, GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q) Laptop Review

HP Envy 15-ep0017np: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep0017np

HP Envy 15-ep0123tx: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep0123tx

HP Envy 15-ep0813no: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep0813no

MSI Stealth 15M A11SDK-085: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 15.60"
  External Review » MSI Stealth 15M A11SDK-085

MSI Stealth 15M A11SDK-032RU: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 15.60"
  External Review » MSI Stealth 15M A11SDK-032RU

MSI Creator 15 A10SD-276ES: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60"
  External Review » MSI Creator 15 A10SD-276ES

HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0011ns: Intel Core i7-10750H, 16.10", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0011ns

HP Envy 15-ep0060ng: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep0060ng

Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU

HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0272ng: Intel Core i7-10750H, 16.10", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0272ng

HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd1275ng: Intel Core i7-10750H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd1275ng

Microsoft Surface Book 3 15: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Book 3 15

Microsoft Surface Book 3 15-SLZ-00005: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Book 3 15-SLZ-00005

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IU-HE001T: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IU-HE001T

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IU-HE021T: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IU-HE021T

Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-AL011T: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-AL011T

Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU-BQ015T: AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502DU-BQ015T

HP Pavilion Gaming 15-dk0045cl: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 15-dk0045cl

HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng: AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng

HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng

HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng: AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, 15.60", 2 kg
   » The HP Pavilion Gaming 15 comes with a convincing 144 Hz display

Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, 15.60", 2.1 kg
   » Rare AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS runs as fast as some 10th gen Core i9-10980HK laptops and at a lower TDP

Microsoft Surface Book 3 15: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.00", 1.9 kg
   » Surface Book 3 15 reviewed: Predecessor achieves similar results

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2019-04-23)