Motorola Moto G24 smartphone review – An attractive phone with a 90 Hz display
Possible competitors compared
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price from |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
78.8 % | 05/2024 | Motorola Moto G24 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 181 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.56" | 1612x720 | |
79 % | 04/2024 | Motorola Moto G24 Power Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 197 g | 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash | 6.56" | 1612x720 | |
77.7 % | 03/2024 | Xiaomi Redmi 13C Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 192 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.74" | 1600x720 | |
77.2 % | 07/2023 | Nokia G11 Plus T606, Mali-G57 MP1 | 192 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.52" | 1600x720 | |
80 % | 04/2024 | Samsung Galaxy A15 Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2 | 200 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.50" | 2340x1080 |
Case and connectivity – Nice-looking plastic
The Moto G24 follows Motorola's design philosophy of this year by integrating the phone's camera module very seamlessly into the top left of its case: The material and color around the lenses are the same as the rest of the case and a slight curve embellishes the transition between the flat back and the slightly thicker camera module. The material used is plastic, which has a matte shimmer in all three color variants: black, light green and rosé.
The case is stable and can only be dented slightly in the middle. It isn't possible to twist the phone and it doesn't creak with pressure applied to it. The manufacturer has given the phone an IP52 certification, so it can withstand dust and splashes of water but shouldn't be submerged in any liquids. The Moto G24 is ever so slightly thinner and 5 grams lighter than the Moto G24 Power and in general, it is a compact phone.
Until a year ago, significantly less storage was standard within this price range; this year, 128 GB of flash storage is the norm. 8 GB of RAM should be sufficient for most applications. Fortunately, the Moto G24 also comes with NFC, so you can use mobile payment services or interact with other devices nearby. A 3.5 mm jack makes it possible to connect headphones and other audio devices.
Our test device can handle two SIM cards at once, whereas it doesn't feature eSIM support. In addition, there is a separate slot for a microSD card. The card reader worked quite fast during our test using the Angelbird V60 as a reference card.
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Angelbird V60) | |
Motorola Moto G24 Power (Angelbird V60) | |
Motorola Moto G24 (Angelbird V60) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 13C (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (12.1 - 77, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Nokia G11 Plus (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
Communication, software and operation – 3 years of updates guaranteed
The Moto G24 doesn't support 5G, so it is a pure LTE phone. The frequencies available on our test device are limited to the bare minimum to ensure operation in Central Europe, where this test was carried out. The same applies to models purchased in other parts of the world, which are limited to the common local frequencies. If you want to use your smartphone abroad to access the web, then you may have to look for a different phone.
Reception was quite good during our test using several random samples, but it couldn't come close to high-end smartphones.
In terms of Wi-Fi, the Moto G24 supports Wi-Fi 5 as the fastest standard and, as a result, achieves the expected 300 - 350 MBit/s that is usual for the price range. The transmissions ran at a fairly constant speed, even with the test repeated several times.
On the software side, Motorola has installed fairly pure Android 14 and has made additional functions accessible via the Moto app. This is clever, as additional features can be easily added via app updates. The latest security patches are from March 2024, so still reasonably up-to-date at the time of testing. Motorola has promised updates every two months until January 2027. It is not known whether the phone will see any further operating system versions.
The phone is DRM L1-certified, so you can stream content from most major providers in HD.
Its screen can display up to 90 images per second, meaning it reacts quickly to inputs. The touchscreen works very precisely—even in the corners and along the edges. A fingerprint sensor is integrated into the standby button on the right-hand side of the case. It recognizes fingerprints very precisely after one or more prints have been saved and there is only a minimal delay when unlocking the phone.
Facial recognition is also possible which works via the front-facing camera without an additional sensor. It is also fairly accurate. In darker environments, the screen light is usually sufficient for recognition.
Networking | |
Motorola Moto G24 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Motorola Moto G24 Power | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Xiaomi Redmi 13C | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Nokia G11 Plus | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Cameras – Decent photo quality
Motorola uses a 50-megapixel sensor from Samsung as the Moto G24's main camera, which usually only uses 1/4 of its resolution for photos. This results in larger pixels and a bigger light yield.
HDR shots look rather mediocre; the plant in the foreground remains quite dark, whereas the bright background is easy to recognize. The camera's overall image sharpness isn't the best; the sunlit areas of the photo of our surroundings are slightly too bright but overall, the image looks okay.
In low light and high contrasts, the picture brightening works well but its sharpness is visibly reduced. Without a light source in the picture, the phone's camera is no longer able to adequately brighten the picture in low light conditions.
Videos can be recorded at a maximum of 1080p and 30fps. The autofocus works quite fast but it doesn't always work invisibly.
The device also features a macro lens for extreme close-up shots—it has a very low resolution of 2 megapixels. Snapshots look acceptable but you shouldn't enlarge the pictures too much.
The selfie cam on the front has a resolution of 8 megapixels and takes decent photos in good light. The photos' brightness could be a little better, but you can enlarge them without losing too much quality.
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low lightDisplay – 90 Hz but with a blue tint
The screen shows no major differences compared to the Moto G24 Power: Its resolution of 1,612 x 720 pixels is not unusual for the price range, but it is still quite low. Fonts in particular appear visibly blurrier than on Full HD screens of a similar size.
Its maximum brightness is around 510 cd/m², so it can also be used in somewhat brighter environments but in direct sunlight, it is almost impossible to see anything due to reflections.
We discovered a visible blue tint when testing the screen using software from CalMAN and our spectrophotometer. Strong red tones in particular are somewhat distorted by this and the display appears quite cool in general.
We did not notice any PWM flickering even at low brightness levels.
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 521 cd/m²
Contrast: 1336:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.111
Motorola Moto G24 IPS, 1612x720, 6.56 | Motorola Moto G24 Power IPS, 1612x720, 6.56 | Xiaomi Redmi 13C IPS, 1600x720, 6.74 | Nokia G11 Plus IPS, 1600x720, 6.52 | Samsung Galaxy A15 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.50 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | -21% | -31% | -18% | 93% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36 ? | 39 ? -8% | 44.9 ? -25% | 47.7 ? -33% | 2 ? 94% |
Response Time Black / White * | 21.4 ? | 28.6 ? -34% | 29.2 ? -36% | 21.8 ? -2% | 1.7 ? 92% |
PWM Frequency | 187 | ||||
Screen | -6% | 3% | -19% | 42% | |
Brightness middle | 521 | 499 -4% | 430 -17% | 395 -24% | 731 40% |
Brightness | 510 | 497 -3% | 424 -17% | 385 -25% | 711 39% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 93 0% | 92 -1% | 94 1% | 93 0% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.49 -26% | 0.28 28% | 0.3 23% | |
Contrast | 1336 | 1018 -24% | 1536 15% | 1317 -1% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.83 | 4.82 -0% | 4.06 16% | 6.21 -29% | 2.31 52% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.71 | 7.76 -1% | 8.11 -5% | 10.61 -38% | 3.51 54% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.3 | 4.7 11% | 5 6% | 8.3 -57% | 1.7 68% |
Gamma | 2.111 104% | 2.073 106% | 2.35 94% | 2.639 83% | 2.091 105% |
CCT | 7021 93% | 7445 87% | 7813 83% | 7999 81% | 6424 101% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -14% /
-9% | -14% /
-4% | -19% /
-19% | 68% /
55% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
21.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise | |
↘ 8.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.9 ms rise | |
↘ 16.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17803 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Performance, emissions and battery life – Good speakers, good runtimes
A MediaTek Helio G85 is used as the phone's SoC. It is a popular choice within this price range and is also used inside the Xiaomi Redmi 13C, for example. The processor is by no means capable of miracle performance levels, but it is sufficient for smooth navigation through the device's menus in most cases. However, more complex apps reveal where its performance limits lie. The Samsung Galaxy A15 4G, for example, offers significantly more power.
The SoC doesn't do well with complex graphics either, but that isn't to be expected in this price range. It is annoying that Motorola has also chosen to use very slow storage: Although eMMC flash is the standard inside inexpensive phones, the Galaxy A15 4G shows that much faster storage modules enable shorter loading times and a generally smoother system.
After 1 hour of our stress test, we measured the Moto G24's surface temperatures. The result: 39.1 °C was the maximum value we noted—this is noticeable but not critical. However, we measured this at room temperature, so it could easily be even higher in the summer or in hot environments. The SoC's performance isn't throttled even after prolonged full load scenarios.
The speaker on the bottom edge of the phone does not have to do its job alone, as it is supported by the phone's earpiece, making stereo sound possible. The sound is quite good for the price range and even a few low mids are audible. External audio devices can be connected via the 3.5mm audio jack or Bluetooth. Lots of codecs are available for wireless audio transmission, including hi-res-audio-capable ones such as LDAC and more exotic variants such as Opus.
The phone's 5,000 mAh battery is exactly 1,000 mAh weaker than that of the Moto G24 Power. This made itself noticeable during our WLAN test: Its runtimes turned out to be over 2 hours shorter, but they are still decent compared to the rest of the comparison field. 16:09 hours of continuous use without needing to recharge the phone should make it well-equipped for everyday use.
It should be noted that its charging speed is reduced compared to the Moto G24 Power, with a maximum of only 15 watts. This means that it takes up to 2:30 hours for the battery to be fully charged again.
Motorola Moto G24 | Motorola Moto G24 Power | Xiaomi Redmi 13C | Nokia G11 Plus | Samsung Galaxy A15 | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 5% | 5% | -13% | 162% | -17% | 292% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 291.9 | 297 2% | 300.2 3% | 270.6 -7% | 967.8 232% | 283 ? -3% | 1526 ? 423% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 252 | 253.2 0% | 179.4 -29% | 196 -22% | 488.5 94% | 194.6 ? -23% | 1139 ? 352% |
Random Read 4KB | 86.3 | 100 16% | 101.5 18% | 81.5 -6% | 233.2 170% | 82.7 ? -4% | 250 ? 190% |
Random Write 4KB | 90.9 | 92.2 1% | 114.8 26% | 77.1 -15% | 229.6 153% | 55.1 ? -39% | 275 ? 203% |
Temperature
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
Speakers
Motorola Moto G24 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A15 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Runtimes
Pros
Cons
Verdict – Simple but appealing
The Motorola Moto G24 is a decent budget phone in its own right with a bright display, decent cameras, good speaker sound and runtimes suitable for everyday use. However, it also faces some great in-house competition: the Moto G24 Power offers a larger battery, faster charging and more storage.
However, if you are content with fewer features and want to save a few dollars, the Moto G24 boasts a good overall package including NFC, a 90 Hz display and a very stylish and well-made case in modern but not obtrusive colors.
In terms of performance, you shouldn't set your expectations too high, but the same can be said for the entire price class. If you predominantly write messages, surf the web and make phone calls, then the Moto G24 will be totally sufficient.
The Moto G24 is a simple phone for little money which offers a decent range of features and an attractive case.
A further alternative could be the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G which is pretty cheap these days, plus, it offers considerably better performance.
Price and availability
The Motorola Moto G24 can currently be found on Amazon for US$195.
Motorola Moto G24
-
05/08/2024 v7
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.