Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Arc Graphics 140T

Intel Arc 140T

Intel Arc 140T is the iGPU used in the Intel Arrow Lake H/HX processor series. It is based on the Xe+ architecture (and not the newer Xe2 architecture that e.g. the Arc Graphics 140V in Lunar Lake uses). The graphics adapter features 8 cores (128 CUs, 8 Raytracing units) with XMX instructions for improved AI performance and 8 MB L2-Cache.

Thanks to the similar core count and clock speed but higher TDP, the performance should be similar to the Xe2 based Intel Arc 140V iGPU. First leaked benchmarks even showed a vastly better performance. All in all, we think that the Arc 140T will be only suited for entry level gaming in lowest settings.

The Arc 140T is integrated in the H and HX series of CPUs but use an own chiplet that is manufactured at TSMC in 5nm (N5P process).

ArchitectureXe+
Pipelines8 - unified
Raytracing Cores8
CacheL2: 8 MB
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12 Ultrimate
Date of Announcement06.01.2025
CPU in Arc 140TGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H16 x 4500 MHz, 45 W? MHz2350 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H16 x 4500 MHz, 28 W? MHz2300 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H16 x 4400 MHz, 28 W? MHz2250 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H16 x 4400 MHz, 28 W? MHz2250 MHz
min. - max.? MHz2250 - 2350 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.2 pt (10%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.05426 -98%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2.9 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
2.91 -10%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
2.96 -9%
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
2.97 -8%
AMD Radeon 780M
2.99 -8%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
3.13 -3%
Intel Arc A310
3.17 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
3.17 -2%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
3.19 -2%
Intel Arc Graphics 140T
3.24
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
3.27 1%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3.35 3%
AMD Radeon 890M
3.38 4%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
3.45 6%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
3.46 7%
AMD Radeon 880M
3.48 7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3.49 8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
3.62 12%
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
3.68 14%
...
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
19 486%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
33.3 928%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2769     avg: 4067     median: 4141 (11%)     max: 4694 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2466     avg: 3683     median: 3765 (8%)     max: 4212 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 497297     avg: 511305     median: 517962 (52%)     max: 518657 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 193121     avg: 209959     median: 204574 (24%)     max: 237569 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 31110     avg: 37274     median: 38257.5 (36%)     max: 40950 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 47072     avg: 50913     median: 50818.5 (13%)     max: 54553 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 4899     avg: 7919     median: 8093 (12%)     max: 9595 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5433     avg: 8576     median: 8663.5 (8%)     max: 10299 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 231964     avg: 262334     median: 250390 (28%)     max: 316591 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3927     avg: 5780     median: 5779.5 (7%)     max: 7632 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 29556     avg: 32219     median: 33359 (31%)     max: 33741 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 35478     avg: 38314     median: 39419 (15%)     max: 40046 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 9776     avg: 12675     median: 12839 (16%)     max: 14934 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 9684     avg: 12251     median: 12272 (9%)     max: 14932 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 52307     avg: 55095     median: 55017.5 (16%)     max: 58039 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 46778     avg: 49145     median: 48857.5 (27%)     max: 52086 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 48490     avg: 53521     median: 54520 (60%)     max: 57554 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 45558     avg: 47337     median: 47512 (62%)     max: 48766 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 25.4     avg: 27.3     median: 26.2 (8%)     max: 30.4 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 59.6     avg: 68.7     median: 65 (16%)     max: 81.6 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 3.75     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (1%)     max: 4.02 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 25.9     avg: 29.3     median: 27.7 (5%)     max: 34.2 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
19.3 fps (5%)
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 61.4     avg: 69.5     median: 69 (19%)     max: 78.2 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 0.79     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.92 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 32     avg: 34.7     median: 36.1 (14%)     max: 36.1 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 64.2     avg: 69.1     median: 71.4 (12%)     max: 71.8 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 64.9     avg: 67.9     median: 69 (10%)     max: 69.9 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 66.5     avg: 69     median: 67.1 (18%)     max: 73.4 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 6.43     avg: 6.7     median: 6.6 (1%)     max: 7.05 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 24.5     avg: 27.3     median: 26.9 (5%)     max: 30.5 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 31     avg: 31.1     median: 31.1 (5%)     max: 31.1 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 64.6     avg: 75.2     median: 78.3 (9%)     max: 82.7 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 6.33     avg: 6.5     median: 6.4 (2%)     max: 6.81 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 47.1     avg: 49     median: 48.8 (7%)     max: 51 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 94.7     avg: 97.1     median: 96.9 (11%)     max: 99.6 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 51     avg: 56.5     median: 58.1 (9%)     max: 60.5 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 6.48     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 7.02 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 16.9     avg: 17.3     median: 17.3 (5%)     max: 17.7 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 107     avg: 118     median: 119 (13%)     max: 128 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 6.38     avg: 6.7     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 6.89 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 34.8     avg: 36.9     median: 37.1 (13%)     max: 38.8 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 21.5     avg: 23.2     median: 23.8 (12%)     max: 24.3 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 23.9     avg: 25.3     median: 25.3 (7%)     max: 26.6 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
min: 6.13     avg: 6.4     median: 6.3 (1%)     max: 6.81 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 6.8     avg: 7     median: 7 (5%)     max: 7.08 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 44.9     avg: 49.8     median: 51.3 (7%)     max: 53.1 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 7.27     avg: 7.5     median: 7.4 (1%)     max: 7.94 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 19.9     avg: 23.5     median: 24 (11%)     max: 26.7 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 12.8     avg: 13.9     median: 14.3 (9%)     max: 14.6 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 14.6     avg: 16.3     median: 16.6 (6%)     max: 17.8 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 13323     avg: 17305     median: 16985 (12%)     max: 21927 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 155.37     avg: 161.3     median: 157.6 (52%)     max: 174.65 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 152     avg: 191.8     median: 201 (12%)     max: 219.75 fps
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 38.3     avg: 41.2     median: 41.2 (15%)     max: 44.1 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 81.3     avg: 90.8     median: 90.8 (16%)     max: 100.3 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 208.5     avg: 229.6     median: 229.6 (17%)     max: 250.7 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 155.2     avg: 164.9     median: 164.9 (16%)     max: 174.6 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 249.6     avg: 269.5     median: 269.5 (6%)     max: 289.3 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 374.3     avg: 405.3     median: 405.3 (17%)     max: 436.2 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 822.6     avg: 875     median: 874.8 (7%)     max: 927 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 508     median: 315 (8%)     max: 1528 fps
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 73.6     median: 73.6 (13%)     max: 143.6 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 28049     avg: 39273     median: 40934.5 (11%)     max: 43036 points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 26352     avg: 34489     median: 34813 (9%)     max: 40404 points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 965     avg: 1084     median: 1084.5 (4%)     max: 1203 Samples/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 3657     avg: 3841     median: 3785.5 (7%)     max: 4137 Samples/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 7612     avg: 7767     median: 7754 (6%)     max: 7948 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 42.7     avg: 49.9     median: 49.2 (7%)     max: 62.5 Watt
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 32.7     avg: 54.8     median: 55.1 (15%)     max: 70 Watt
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 44.3     avg: 54.7     median: 54.5 (7%)     max: 67.4 Watt
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.326     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.4468 fps per Watt
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
38.7 dB(A) (55%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
52.4 57.6 70.3 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45.3 49.1 60.9 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.7 37.9 47.2 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
15.4
30.5
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2

Kingdom Come Deliverance 2

2025
low 1920x1080
37.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
29.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
53.5 69.6 75.5 76 76.5 77.7 77.7 78.7 82.3 86.4 86.5 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47.4 66.7 69.3 69.4 69.5 69.6 70.3 71.5 74.1 77.6 79 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.5 51.7 53.3 54.2 54.5 55.2 56.6 58.9 59.3 59.6 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.4 17.8 18.1 18.1 18.2 19.3 19.5 19.9 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
low 1920x1080
107.8 127.8 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
82.9 88.3 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63.3 66.5 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55.7 59.8 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
202.1
189.5
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
24.8 30.3 32.5 35.8 35.9 35.9 37.3 37.3 37.6 38 38.4 38.8 40.8 41.7 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.8 25.3 26.1 30 30.4 30.5 30.8 31.4 32.3 33.5 34.7 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17 21.3 22.8 24.3 25.2 26.4 26.6 26.7 27 27.7 28.7 29.7 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.4 18.6 20.7 20.7 20.9 22.8 23.5 23.9 24.1 24.5 24.7 24.8 24.8 26.5 27.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
54.2
57
53.8
57.2
27.5
27.5
55.2
47.7
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
9.3
8.3
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
21
24.8
26.2
21.1
21.5
23.2
21.7
21.9
14.8
23.5
23
17.8
20.1
19.4
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

2023
low 1920x1080
25.6 31.3 32 33.4 35.6 35.8 36.9 37.8 38.8 39.1 39.4 39.8 40.9 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.3 25.7 26.1 26.6 28.4 28.8 28.8 29.8 30 30.3 30.5 30.7 31.4 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.6 21.8 22.8 23.6 24.8 25.1 25.3 25.7 25.8 26 26 26.1 26.9 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.2 21 22.5 23 23 24.4 24.4 24.7 24.8 25.2 25.3 25.4 25.5 26.4 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
51.7
55.2
58
57.4
49.5
42.9
50.5
Low Preset FSR 2.2 Balanced 1920x1080
38.8
The Witcher 3 v4

The Witcher 3 v4

2023
low 1920x1080
54.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
42.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
37.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
99.4
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
92.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
50.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
102.2 158.1 160.5 162.3 167.7 187.7 190.3 194.2 200 208 216 ~ 177 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36 61.6 74.1 75.8 80.3 81.9 83.6 87 90.2 90.9 92.1 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.1 56.6 62.7 64.3 64.8 68.2 71.2 71.4 75.1 75.1 76.5 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.8 46.2 48.6 51.9 52.7 53.9 56.3 57.7 59 61.2 61.6 63.1 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
80 87 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48 48 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44 45 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38 42 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
51.5 52.1 53.1 53.3 55.7 56.3 56.4 56.5 56.5 58.8 61.7 61.7 62.9 63.5 64.3 73.4 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42.7 43.2 43.3 44.4 44.5 44.7 44.9 45.1 47.1 47.3 47.3 50.2 52 53.1 54.9 57.7 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.2 34.3 36.1 37 37.2 37.7 38.1 38.4 38.5 38.6 38.8 41 42.9 43.3 46.3 49.2 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
47 66.6 67.5 69.1 72.3 72.9 75.2 80.1 80.1 80.6 80.8 81.6 81.8 88.7 90.1 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.4 38.8 39.3 40.1 40.6 40.8 42 43.9 44.2 44.3 44.9 46.9 47.1 47.1 47.9 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.5 25.8 26 27.9 28.3 28.6 29.4 29.5 29.8 30.6 31.4 31.7 31.7 33 33.1 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.4  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
97.3 97.7 98.9 100.1 100.1 102.9 103.5 104.1 104.7 104.8 105.6 105.6 106.6 107.3 107.7 109.1 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.9 63.9 68.8 72.4 75.4 76.8 78.3 79.6 82.2 82.9 83.5 84.7 89.6 91.1 91.2 94.9 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.7 51.8 53.1 53.6 59.7 63.6 65 69.6 74.7 75.8 76.8 80.1 82.5 83.5 84.8 88.1 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51.5 61.1 61.9 68.9 69.5 71.2 71.5 75.5 76.7 77.5 80.1 81.4 82.1 83.2 83.8 94.9 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
158.7 164.4 166.8 ~ 163 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
100.9 107.2 109.9 ~ 106 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
54.9 56.8 63.6 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28.1 31 31.2 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
72.3
64.5
66.8
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
134.6 140.4 156.4 163.6 164 164.1 168.4 168.9 171 172 176.5 176.6 ~ 163 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
111.4 133.6 150.4 152.3 152.6 153.9 154 155 160 161.1 164.9 165.2 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.5 37.3 37.5 38.1 39 39.7 41.2 41.7 41.7 43.2 43.8 44.2 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.4 15.4 15.6 15.7 15.9 16.3 16.6 16.8 17 17 17.1 18 18.1 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
112.8
133.7
122.9
130
115.8
112.5
111.1
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
125
150.8
137.3
143
37
129.8
127.8
118.3
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2560524130.2
Kingdom Come Deliverance 237.329.824.518
F1 2476695418
Total War Pharaoh118866558
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty36302523
Baldur's Gate 336282424
The Witcher 3 v454.142.737.532.8
Anno 180092.750.43728
Strange Brigade177786554
Far Cry 584484540
X-Plane 11.11594839
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark76422923.4
Dota 2 Reborn104807074
The Witcher 31631065830
GTA V1631513916
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
5
7
3		2
7
5
1		4
8
3
6
6
1
1





For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 29. 23:38:44

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 29 Sep 2025 12:27:33 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12966 +0.03s ... 0.038s

#8 got single benchmarks 12966 +0.059s ... 0.096s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.096s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +1.093s ... 1.19s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.19s

#12 Got 583 rows for game benchmarks. +0.124s ... 1.314s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.314s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.01s ... 1.324s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.146s ... 1.47s

#16 return log +0.003s ... 1.474s

Notebook reviews with Intel Arc Graphics 140T graphics card

Intel subnotebook regains ground — Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA review

Intel subnotebook regains ground — Asus ZenBook 14 OLED UX3405CA review

Intel Evo or AMD Ryzen AI ZenBook – which one takes the crown this year as the better subnotebook? Which is lighter, faster, or simply the more well-rounded pac...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 14.00" | 1.3 kg
Eurocom Blitz Ultra 2 14 laptop review: Strong serviceability at the cost of weight

Eurocom Blitz Ultra 2 14 laptop review: Strong serviceability at the cost of weight

The Blitz Ultra 2 14 is one of the very few 14-inch laptops with support for two M.2 2280 SSDs and two removable DDR5 SODIMM modules for a total of up to 128 GB...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 14.00" | 1.6 kg
Dell 14 Premium laptop review: An XPS 14 in all but name

Dell 14 Premium laptop review: An XPS 14 in all but name

The revered XPS name may be gone, but it lives on in the new Dell 14 Premium. The latest model includes a faster Arrow Lake-H processor with better Turbo Boost ...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 14.50" | 1.7 kg
1 kg Ultrabook with Arrow Lake and excellent input devices - Honor MagicBook Art 14 2025 Review

1 kg Ultrabook with Arrow Lake and excellent input devices - Honor MagicBook Art 14 2025 Review

Honor updates its slim and light MagicBook Art 14 with Intel's Arrow Lake processors as well as a new OLED screen, that is supposed to reach up to 1600 nits. Th...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 14.60" | 1 kg
GMKtec EVO-T1

High-end mini PC – GMKtec EVO-T1 review with Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 80W TDP, 64 GB RAM, and eGPU option

GMKtec presents the EVO-T1, a visually elegant yet powerful mini PC based on the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H. The manufacturer promises high performance and versati...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 946 g

Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G7-21SYS00H00: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G7 review - The affordable office laptop stands out from the competition with its 120 Hz display

Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 0.6 kg
  Review » 2025 Mini PC review: Geekom Mini IT15, a mini-workstation with Intel Core Ultra for professionals and creatives, reviewed

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » This affordable Lenovo laptop is more upgradeable than most ThinkPads: ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 IAL review

Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  Review » Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 convertible review: Double the screen without double the weight

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 review - Now with Arrow Lake and 16 hours of battery life

Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » Intel Arc Graphics 140T analysis – Arrow Lake-H iGPU gains frame generation support

MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » Intel Arc Graphics 140T analysis – Arrow Lake-H iGPU gains frame generation support

Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » Intel Arrow Lake-H CPU analysis: Core Ultra 200H makes Lunar Lake almost redundant

MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » Intel Arrow Lake-H CPU analysis: Core Ultra 200H makes Lunar Lake almost redundant

Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » Asus Zenbook Duo OLED review - The multi-screen convertible now with Intel Arrow Lake

MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo review - The multimedia laptop with a speedy Arrow Lake CPU and impressive runtimes

Acer Aspire Vero 16 AV16-71P: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Vero 16 AV16-71P

Asus Vivobook S16 S3607CA: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S16 S3607CA

Acer Swift Go 16 OLED SFG16-73: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 16 OLED SFG16-73

LG gram Pro 16Z90TP: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » LG gram Pro 16Z90TP

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IAH10: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IAH10

Asus Vivobook S14 S3407CA: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S14 S3407CA

Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10

Asus VivoBook S16 OLED S5606CA: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S16 OLED S5606CA

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UX3405CA: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UX3405CA

Honor MagicBook Pro 14 (2025): Intel Core Ultra 9 285, 14.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook Pro 14 (2025)

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 9 285H: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UX3405CA, Ultra 9 285H

LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90TP: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 16.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » LG gram Pro 2-in-1 16T90TP

MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG

Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA

Eurocom Blitz Ultra 2 14: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » Eurocom Blitz Ultra 2 comes standard with features that most other 14-inch laptops omit

Honor MagicBook Art 14 2025: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 14.60", 1 kg
   » Honor advertises a peak brightness of up to 1600 nits for the MagicBook Art 14 2025, but we only measure 740 nits

Dell 14 Premium: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 14.50", 1.7 kg
   » The XPS 14 lives on through the Dell 14 Premium with very few changes

   » Dell 14 Premium costs as much as the lighter and more powerful Razer Blade 14

Honor MagicBook Art 14 2025: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 14.60", 1 kg
   » Honor's new MagicBook Art 14 2025 has a better keyboard than modern ThinkPads

GMK EVO-T1: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 0.9 kg
   » GMKtec EVO-T1 review: Mini PC with Intel Core Ultra 9 for AI models, LLMs and gaming via OCuLink

Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G7-21SYS00H00: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » Lenovo ThinkPad E14 & ThinkBook 14 - Business vs. prosumer in comparison

   » Lenovo finally offers a better 120 Hz display for the affordable ThinkPad E14

   » 14-inch office laptop with great maintenance options: ThinkPad E14 G7 offers 2 SSD and 2 RAM slots

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 Gen 8 21SJ007SGE: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » This Lenovo ThinkBook laptop is an upgradeability dream - and it is affordable

Lenovo ThinkPad E16 G3-21SSS00E00: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
   » Is the Core Ultra 7 255H worth it in the ThinkPad E16 G3? We tested it

Khadas Mind 2s: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 0.4 kg
   » Modular Khadas Mind 2s mini PC reviewed: Portable desktop replacement can fit into pockets

Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14 Arrow Lake CPU throttling is a bit steeper than we would like

   » Latest Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14 weighs even less than the smaller 13-inch version while offering larger displays

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon RX 6850M XT
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
RTX A4500 Laptop GPU
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop *
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6800M
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
RTX A4000 Laptop GPU *
Radeon RX 6800S
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
Radeon 8060S *
Radeon RX 7600M XT *
Radeon RX 7700S *
M3 Max 40-Core GPU *
M2 Max 38-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Radeon RX 6700M
M3 Max 30-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 7600M *
M4 Max 32-Core GPU *
M2 Max 30-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 7600S
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
A770M
Radeon RX 6650M XT *
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6700S
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Radeon 8050S *
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU *
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q *
Radeon RX 6600S *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) *
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Generation Laptop *
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
A730M *
Radeon 8040S *
Radeon Pro 5600M *
Radeon RX 5600M
Quadro P5000
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
A570M *
RTX A1000 Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Arc 140T *
A550M *
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Radeon 890M *
Arc 130T *
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Class 3

A530M *
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
RTX A500 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 6550M *
Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6550S *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro M5500
Quadro P4000
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
A370M *
Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M *
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6450M *
Arc 8-Core *
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Arc 140V *
Radeon RX 6300M *
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce MX570
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) *
Arc 130V *
Adreno 840 *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Arc 7-Core *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
M4 8-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q *
T1200 Laptop GPU *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
A310 *
A350M *
T600 Laptop GPU *
T550 Laptop GPU *
GeForce GTX 980M
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon 880M *
Adreno 830 *
Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS *
Radeon 780M *
GeForce MX550
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
GeForce GTX 970M
T500 Laptop GPU *
GeForce MX450 *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Vega M GL / 870
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 860M *
Radeon 760M *
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS *
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
GeForce GTX 965M
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro M2200
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro M1200
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 640
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
GeForce MX150
Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Radeon 840M *
Radeon 740M *
Graphics 4-Core *
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon RX 540 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS *
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M470X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
Quadro M620 *
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
UHD Graphics 64EUs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS *
Radeon R9 M470 *
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
GeForce MX230
Vega 8 *
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GeForce MX130
GeForce 940MX
Quadro M520
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
GeForce 930MX
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Radeon R7 M445
Quadro M500M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
GeForce 930M
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 530
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 645
GeForce MX110 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
GeForce 920MX
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) *
Radeon R7 M460 *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon R8 M445DX
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M440
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 820M *
Radeon 520
Radeon 610
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
UHD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
Radeon R5 M430
Vega 3 *
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520
Iris Graphics 6100

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-02- 4)