HP Pro Mini 400 G9 Mini-PC review: NUC PC with good efficiency thanks to Intel Core i5-13500T and modular design
![](fileadmin/_processed_/3/1/csm_Pro_Mini_400_G9_30_0a52f3f4dd.jpg)
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- News Writer
Details here
The well-known manufacturer HP sells a variety of Mini-PCs for every budget. The HP Pro Mini 400 G9 models start at just under 400 euros, while the most expensive devices are still within a reasonable range at just under 1,000 euros. All devices have one thing in common: only T-models based on the LGA-1700 socket are used as processors. In this test, we look at the HP Pro Mini 400 G9 with Intel Core i5-13500T a conventional, economical desktop processor with low power consumption. We will see in the test whether HP succeeds in holding its own against the wide range of Mini-PCs based on mobile processors. The working memory in our test sample comprises 16 GB RAM and a 512 GB SSD is installed for the mass storage. The device can be purchased directly from the manufacturer in the online store for 870 euros. A Windows 11 Professional license as well as a keyboard and mouse are included.
As a compact office device, the HP Pro Mini 400 G9 has to compete against powerful Mini-PCs. We take a closer look at the duel with the HP Elite Mini 800 G9, which is equipped with the Intel Core i5-13500 ran through our test course. We have compiled all comparison devices in the following table.
Possible competitors
Date | Version | Model | Memory | Weight | Height | price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/2024 | v8 (new) | HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA i5-13500T, UHD Graphics 770 | 16384 MB | 1.2 kg | 34 mm | 870 Euro |
06/2024 | v8 (new) | HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA i5-13500, UHD Graphics 770 | 16384 MB | 1.3 kg | 34 mm | 1085 Euro |
06/2024 | v8 (new) | Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 440 g | 37 mm | 930 EUR |
05/2024 | v7 (old) | Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 615 g | 55 mm | 709 EUR |
05/2024 | v7 (old) | Minisforum MS-01 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 1.5 kg | 48 mm | 979 EUR |
04/2024 | v7 (old) | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 32768 MB | 768 g | 57 mm | 1199 EUR |
08/2023 | v7 (old) | Khadas Mind i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 32768 MB | 438 g | 20 mm |
Note: We have updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7 here available here.
Case - Sturdy metal chassis with modular design
The HP Pro Mini 400 G9 is visually similar to the HP Elite Mini 800 G9 is very similar. However, a closer look reveals clear differences. The top of the all-metal casing is now completely closed and does not have any ventilation openings. We will take a look at the extent to which this affects performance and temperatures later. This design certainly has one advantage, as dirt and dust cannot get into the system so easily. A plastic panel is mounted on the front, which fits in perfectly with the overall look. The workmanship of the HP Pro Mini 400 G9 is high quality and offers no cause for criticism. The modular design, which makes it possible to quickly remove some components and carry out minor repairs yourself, should be emphasized.
Equipment
At first glance, there is a lot on offer in terms of connectivity. However, you should not be fooled by this, as modern interfaces such as USB4 or OCuLink have to be dispensed with. In terms of connectivity, however, the HP Pro Mini 400 G9 is clearly superior to most other Mini-PCs. Screens can be connected via HDMI or DisplayPort.
Communication
The HP Pro Mini 400 G9, like the HP Elite Mini 800 G9, have an Intel Wi-Fi 6E-AX211 wireless module installed. In our test sample, however, the Wi-Fi module delivers a slightly better performance, which puts the HP Pro Mini 400 G9 in a good second place. Only the Minisforum MS-01 was able to consistently deliver slightly better results. The WLAN module can work in both the 5 and 6 GHz frequency bands. We used the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 for this test. A wired network connection is also possible. However, HP only installs an RJ45 socket here, which only works at GBit speed at best.
Accessories
Maintenance
The HP Pro Mini 400 G9 is always sold with RAM and a mass storage device. It is therefore not necessary to disassemble the device for the first start in order to install missing components, as is the case with barebone devices. The mini-PC can be opened easily and even without tools. The case cover is only held in place by a small knurled screw. Once this is loosened, the cover can be pushed back slightly and then removed upwards. The RAM is located directly under the CPU fan, which can simply be flipped upwards. In order to access the mass storage, you have to use a tool because the 2.5-inch bay has to be removed. In the HP Pro Mini 400 G9, however, the M.2 memory can only be replaced. It is not possible to install a second M.2 SSD. If you want to use a second mass storage device, you have to resort to a 2.5-inch model.
The modular design also makes it much easier to clean the device and the CPU fan. As a special feature, it should be mentioned that the CPU of the Pro Mini 400 G9 can be removed, as the Intel Core i5-13500T is a conventional desktop CPU and is installed in the LGA1700 socket.
Sustainability
HP packs the Pro Mini 400 G9 and the included accessories in a simple cardboard box. Individual components, such as the device itself and the power supply unit, are packed in separate plastic sleeves, which could certainly be saved in the interests of sustainability. The modular design, which allows minor repairs, is commendable. HP offers several parts in its spare parts store. The SSD, RAM, and CPU are not proprietary components and can also be purchased from third-party suppliers. As the manufacturer informed us, so-called ocean-bound plastic
is used for the production of the devices, which would otherwise have ended up in the oceans. The manufacturer also relies on innovative recycled raw materials such as used cooking oil, fishing nets, and coffee grounds. This is underpinned by various certifications from external partners such as "Blue Angel", "EPEAT" and "TCO".
Performance - Economical Core i5-13500T with 14 cores and 20 threads
The HP Pro Mini 400 G9 presents itself as a compact office PC. With the Intel Core i5-13500T, HP installs an economical processor, which nevertheless delivers good multi-core performance due to its number of physical computing units. However, the biggest weakness is probably the 3D performance, as the iGPU of the desktop processor is inferior to most iGPUs of the mobile processors.
Test conditions
We use the "HP Optimized" energy profile for all performance tests with the HP Pro Mini 400 G9. HP itself does not offer any further options for customizing the system's performance. The processor's power limits can be adjusted via the XTU (Intel Extreme Tuning Utility) tool. However, we do not recommend increasing the values. This is because the power consumption is too high and the power supply unit is not designed for this.
Processor
The Intel Core i5-13500T is a conventional desktop processor and belongs to the Raptor Lake series. With 6 P and 8 E cores, the processor can process 20 threads simultaneously. Unlike conventional Mini-PCs, the processor in the HP Pro Mini 400 G9 is not permanently soldered. The abbreviation "T" reveals that the CPU installed is a particularly economical model, which is specially designed for use in compact systems. With this in mind, the choice of the Intel Core i5-13500T in combination with the small case is the right decision. Intel specifies a power limit of 35 watts under continuous load for the processor installed here, although up to 92 watts are possible in Turbo mode. However, HP cuts the maximum value and sets the limit at 74 watts. However, the Intel Core i5-13500T does not reach this value in the further course of the test. It doesn't have to, because the performance of the processor is good and compared to the HP Elite Mini 800 G9б which is equipped with the Intel Core i5-13500б our test sample only loses 9 percentage points in the average performance comparison.
All rivals offer more performance, which cannot be denied and the results do not lie. Nevertheless, one should not underestimate the performance of the HP Pro Mini 400 G9, which ensures good efficiency concerning the power consumption.
For further comparisons and benchmarks, please refer to our CPU comparison table.
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Khadas Mind | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Khadas Mind | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Khadas Mind |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Khadas Mind | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A |
WinRAR - Result | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Khadas Mind |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Khadas Mind | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Khadas Mind |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum MS-01 |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum MS-01 |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Khadas Mind | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Khadas Mind | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Khadas Mind | |
Minisforum MS-01 |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Khadas Mind | |
Minisforum MS-01 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC | |
Khadas Mind | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Average of class Mini PC (561 - 27538, n=110, last 2 years) | |
Khadas Mind |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (3604 - 116903, n=110, last 2 years) | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Khadas Mind |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Khadas Mind | |
Average of class Mini PC (225 - 5096, n=110, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Average of class Mini PC (8172 - 119802, n=110, last 2 years) | |
Khadas Mind |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (408 - 15525, n=110, last 2 years) | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Khadas Mind |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (1958 - 62378, n=110, last 2 years) | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Khadas Mind |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Khadas Mind | |
Average of class Mini PC (3691 - 177158, n=110, last 2 years) | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Khadas Mind | |
Average of class Mini PC (74.8 - 1233, n=110, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Average of class Mini PC (308 - 14722, n=110, last 2 years) | |
Khadas Mind |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Khadas Mind | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (4408 - 45560, n=110, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
The Cinebench R15 continuous loop makes it clear that the Intel Core i5-13500T loses performance after the first run. The Turbo can be used less and less and the performance only stabilizes after the 6th run. Under continuous load, the Intel Core i5-13500T can outperform the Intel Core i7-1360P of the Khada's Mind by a narrow margin.
System performance
The HP Pro Mini 400 G9 performs worse than its competitors in the benchmark results with regard to system performance. The use of DDR4 RAM, which also only works in single-channel mode, certainly contributes to this result. This is particularly evident in the AIDA64 benchmarks. However, the HP Elite Mini 800 G9 could not perform significantly better. The subjective performance of our test system is nevertheless good and does not suffer from noticeable latencies.
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Khadas Mind | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Average of class Mini PC (6481 - 71990, n=110, last 2 years) | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Khadas Mind | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (6914 - 75449, n=110, last 2 years) | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Khadas Mind | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Average of class Mini PC (6862 - 89318, n=110, last 2 years) | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Khadas Mind | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 154.6, n=110, last 2 years) | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latencies
The HP Pro Mini 400 G9 struggles with increased latencies. The values already increase when opening several tabs in the Edge browser and already reach the maximum value. Playing the 4K test video or the short stress test does not worsen the latencies any further. However, some dropped frames can still be seen during 4K playback.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Khadas Mind | |
Minisforum MS-01 |
* ... smaller is better
Mass storage
An SSD with 512 GB storage space is installed in the HP Pro Mini 400 G9. The model comes directly from HP and is connected via PCIe 4.0 x 4. Despite the fast connection, the SSD does not manage to hold its own against its competitors with good results. Nevertheless, the SSD is up to everyday tasks. During the test phase, we had no problems installing our test programs. The HP Pro Mini 400 G9 does not use an active cooling unit. Under load, we noticed a significant loss of performance, although this only occurs after a while. Unlike the HP Elite Mini 800 G9, only one M.2 SSD can be installed in the HP Pro Mini 400 G9. Meanwhile, a second mass storage device can be accommodated in the 2.5-inch bay.
For further comparisons and benchmarks, please refer to our Comparison table.
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Khadas Mind | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Average of class Mini PC | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics
As a graphics adapter, the HP Pro Mini 400 G9 only has a weak iGPU. As part of the Intel Core i5-13500T, the iGPU is called Intel UHD Graphics 770 and only offers 32 EUs, which means that the graphics unit has no chance against most other Mini-PCs. The HP Elite Mini 800 G9 also has the same iGPU and had to accept a clear defeat in the test. Our test sample is even slower, which can be attributed to the weaker processor in combination with the slower RAM.
Further comparisons and benchmarks can be found in our GPU comparison table.
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Khadas Mind | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Khadas Mind | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Khadas Mind | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
DaVinci Resolve PugetBench - GPU Effects 0.93 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
Photoshop PugetBench - GPU Score | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
Premiere Pro PugetBench - GPU 0.9 | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Khadas Mind | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA, Intel UHD Graphics 770 i5-13500T | HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA, Intel UHD Graphics 770 i5-13500 | Minisforum MS-01, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-13900H | Geekom GT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-13900H | Minisforum Venus Series NAB9, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900HK | Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 7 155H | Khadas Mind, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i7-1360P | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPECviewperf 12 | 15% | 129% | 95% | 88% | 149% | 80% | 982% | |
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05) | 24.7 | 29.8 21% | 46.7 89% | 41.4 68% | 40.2 63% | 49.8 102% | 37.8 53% | 71 ? 187% |
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) | 20.8 | 23.4 13% | 41.7 100% | 38.6 86% | 35.9 73% | 48.2 132% | 39.4 89% | 62 ? 198% |
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) | 15.4 | 16.7 8% | 30 95% | 28.2 83% | 27.7 80% | 23.1 50% | 7.37 -52% | 35 ? 127% |
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01) | 0.2 | 0.19 -5% | 0.5 150% | 0.41 105% | 0.4 100% | 0.91 355% | 0.46 130% | 12.8 ? 6300% |
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) | 19.7 | 25.1 27% | 51.9 163% | 42.4 115% | 39.8 102% | 54.9 179% | 41.3 110% | 61.6 ? 213% |
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) | 4.98 | 5.18 4% | 14.5 191% | 12.2 145% | 12.2 145% | 16.9 239% | 12 141% | 26.7 ? 436% |
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) | 8.53 | 11.5 35% | 24.8 191% | 19.1 124% | 17.4 104% | 18.2 113% | 21.2 149% | 34.4 ? 303% |
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) | 35.6 | 41.1 15% | 53.1 49% | 46.6 31% | 47.3 33% | 42.7 20% | 41.6 17% | 69.5 ? 95% |
SPECviewperf 13 | 16% | 135% | 114% | 101% | 157% | 109% | 353% | |
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) | 24.3 | 29.7 22% | 46.5 91% | 41.2 70% | 39.9 64% | 46.4 91% | 39 60% | 70.4 ? 190% |
Catia (catia-05) | 30.5 | 33.8 11% | 58.9 93% | 54.7 79% | 51.6 69% | 71.6 135% | 57.1 87% | 89.8 ? 194% |
Creo (creo-02) | 22.5 | 24.6 9% | 46.2 105% | 42.7 90% | 40.2 79% | 29.6 32% | 37.5 67% | 69.6 ? 209% |
Energy (energy-02) | 1.36 | 1.4 3% | 4.72 247% | 4.62 240% | 4.39 223% | 5.69 318% | 4.34 219% | 16.4 ? 1106% |
Maya (maya-05) | 27.4 | 34.6 26% | 58.4 113% | 51.6 88% | 48.3 76% | 59.5 117% | 46.3 69% | 94.2 ? 244% |
Medical (medical-02) | 5.46 | 5.57 2% | 15.8 189% | 15.6 186% | 14.4 164% | 29.7 444% | 16 193% | 33.2 ? 508% |
Showcase (showcase-02) | 8.53 | 11.6 36% | 25 193% | 19.1 124% | 17.3 103% | 18.2 113% | 21.4 151% | 34 ? 299% |
Solidworks (sw-04) | 43.3 | 49.7 15% | 63.7 47% | 58.3 35% | 57.4 33% | 44.8 3% | 53.7 24% | 74.4 ? 72% |
SPECviewperf 2020 | 15% | 173% | 121% | 119% | 195% | 118% | 514% | |
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 1.32 | 1.34 2% | 2.72 106% | 2.69 104% | 3.48 164% | 5.05 283% | 2.67 102% | 6.93 ? 425% |
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 0.76 | 0.76 0% | 4.75 525% | 3.17 317% | 3 295% | 4.61 507% | 2.97 291% | 10.9 ? 1334% |
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 7.73 | 9.08 17% | 19.2 148% | 16.3 111% | 15.1 95% | 17.9 132% | 16.9 119% | 29.2 ? 278% |
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 4.61 | 5.56 21% | 9.99 117% | 8.53 85% | 8.08 75% | 10 117% | 8.82 91% | 18.3 ? 297% |
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 5.53 | 6.66 20% | 11.6 110% | 10.3 86% | 9.78 77% | 12.9 133% | 10.1 83% | 21.2 ? 283% |
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | 5.4 | 5.98 11% | 6.9 28% | 6.62 23% | 6.67 24% | 5.7 6% | 6.01 11% | 39.1 ? 624% |
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 12.2 | 16.1 32% | 34.1 180% | 27.3 124% | 24.4 100% | 35.4 190% | 27.8 128% | 56.1 ? 360% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 15% /
15% | 146% /
144% | 110% /
110% | 103% /
102% | 167% /
166% | 102% /
101% | 616% /
621% |
3DMark 05 Standard | 27996 points | |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 20029 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 12664 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 3665 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 79087 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 14271 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2163 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 994 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 768 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 63 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 485 points | |
Help |
Gaming performance
As we have already seen from the synthetic benchmark results of the Intel UHD Graphics 770 used here, the 3D performance is by no means sufficient to achieve adequate frame rates in modern games. The iGPU can only be expected to handle the simplest casual or browser games, if at all. You get noticeably more performance with the latest iGPUs, such as the AMD Radeon 780M or an Intel Arc 8. At this point we refer to the Geekom A8 and the Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti which are equipped with these.
FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 41.8 | |||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 21.3 | 11.3 | 8 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 18.6 | 15.2 | 14.6 | |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 8.2 | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 7.95 | 6.1 | 5.3 | |
F1 24 (2024) | 21.2 | 18.1 | 12.9 |
Emissions - Intel Core i5-13500T is easy to control
Noise emissions
The HP Pro Mini 400 G9 has a compact metal casing with very few ventilation openings. Based on the economical processor, this decision is understandable, although the noise level is slightly higher compared to the HP Elite Mini 800 G9. In the stress test, we only measured 38.2 dB(A), which is the best result in comparison. The HP Pro Mini 400 G9 is barely audible in idle mode. However, the CPU fan always has to work.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 27.6 / 27.7 / 27.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 33.6 / 38.2 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA i5-13500T, UHD Graphics 770 | HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA i5-13500, UHD Graphics 770 | Minisforum MS-01 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Khadas Mind i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 1% | -23% | -12% | -11% | -8% | -24% | |
off / environment * | 24.7 | 24.4 1% | 24.4 1% | 24.3 2% | 25.4 -3% | 24.9 -1% | 25.2 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 27.6 | 28.1 -2% | 33.7 -22% | 27.9 -1% | 27.5 -0% | 25.4 8% | 34.4 -25% |
Idle Average * | 27.7 | 28.1 -1% | 33.9 -22% | 27.9 -1% | 28 -1% | 25.7 7% | 34.4 -24% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.7 | 28.2 -2% | 34.7 -25% | 28 -1% | 33 -19% | 25.7 7% | 34.5 -25% |
Load Average * | 33.6 | 29.8 11% | 47.7 -42% | 43.8 -30% | 42.8 -27% | 47.8 -42% | 44.7 -33% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 36.2 | 33.9 6% | 45.4 -25% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 38.2 | 40.7 -7% | 49.1 -29% | 48.5 -27% | 44.9 -18% | 49 -28% | 50.4 -32% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.9 | 44.5 | 45.23 | 49 |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
The HP Pro Mini 400 G9 has a sturdy metal casing that does not heat up significantly under load. At a maximum of 38.4 °C, the casing even remains comparatively cool, although there are no additional ventilation openings on the top like on the HP Elite Mini 800 G9. Due to the economical Intel Core i5-13500T the heat development is also kept within limits, which is why this design makes sense. In the stress test, we only measured a maximum of 70 °C for the processor. We also see that the power consumption of 35 watts can easily be maintained over a longer period of time.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.2 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.1 °C / 90 F.
Speaker
Unlike most Mini-PCs, HP installs a small speaker on the front of the Pro Mini 400 G9. This is no replacement for an external sound system, that much should be clear. Nevertheless, the small speaker can be used well in everyday life to listen to quiet music, among other things.
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 16%, average was 23%, worst was 38%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Minisforum Mars Series MC560 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (62.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (20.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 16%, average was 23%, worst was 38%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Energy management
We approve of the use of the economical desktop processor. In terms of efficiency, our test device is significantly better and can even outperform the Minisforum MS-01 can even outperform it. Without load, our test device is very economical with 6.3 to 12.9 watts, and is in no way inferior to the Mini-PCs with laptop technology. Under average load, our measuring device only shows just over 45 watts, which is significantly less than most competitors. At the peak, we briefly see 84 watts, which is not a great challenge for the power supply unit. This is specified with a maximum output of 90 watts.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA i5-13500T, UHD Graphics 770 | HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA i5-13500, UHD Graphics 770 | Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 i9-12900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Minisforum MS-01 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | Khadas Mind i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Average Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -2% | -31% | -53% | -91% | -26% | -4% | -10% | -25% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.3 | 3.5 44% | 7.9 -25% | 12.1 -92% | 14.4 -129% | 9.1 -44% | 7.8 -24% | 4.5 ? 29% | 9.63 ? -53% |
Idle Average * | 8.6 | 7.9 8% | 10.3 -20% | 13.2 -53% | 16.1 -87% | 10.3 -20% | 10.9 -27% | 7.9 ? 8% | 11.5 ? -34% |
Idle Maximum * | 12.9 | 13.2 -2% | 22.3 -73% | 14.1 -9% | 25.5 -98% | 14.4 -12% | 11.8 9% | 11.6 ? 10% | 14.7 ? -14% |
Load Average * | 45.3 | 52.7 -16% | 57.44 -27% | 82.9 -83% | 87.3 -93% | 54.9 -21% | 39.2 13% | 55.8 ? -23% | 53.5 ? -18% |
Load Maximum * | 84 | 122.2 -45% | 93.4 -11% | 106.8 -27% | 123.3 -47% | 110.4 -31% | 76.4 9% | 145.6 ? -73% | 87.7 ? -4% |
* ... smaller is better
Efficiency
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA |
Power Consumption | |
Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Acemagic F2A | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor) | |
Acemagic F2A | |
Geekom GT13 Pro | |
Minisforum Venus Series NAB9 | |
Minisforum MS-01 | |
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA | |
HP Elite Mini 800 G9-5M9T9EA |
Power consumption with external monitor
Power consumption with external monitor
Pros
Cons
Verdict - Intel Core i5-13500T with good efficiency
The HP Pro Mini 400 G9 is a compact PC that can be combined with the Intel Core i5-13500T and achieve good efficiency. The processor is a conventional desktop processor, which can also be removed and replaced if necessary. This clearly sets the compact PC from HP apart from the masses of conventional Mini-PCs. In addition, the entire system has a modular design and can be easily dismantled. Most conventional Mini-PCs currently flooding the market do not offer this either. We very much welcome this approach, as it allows end users to carry out minor maintenance work themselves.
Based on the Intel Core i5-13500T, the HP Pro Mini 400 G9 impresses with good efficiency paired with a variety of external connection options. Unfortunately, there are no modern ports such as USB4 or OCuLink.
In terms of performance, our test sample based on the Intel Core i5-13500T is well equipped, although the competitors from the Far East are usually better positioned here. Nevertheless, the HP Pro Mini 400 G9 is perfectly suited for everyday use. The use of DDR4 could be criticized, especially since the processor also supports the faster DDR5 standard. However, there is no significant difference in comparison with the HP Elite Mini 800 G9. Unfortunately, HP only installed a single SO-DIMM module in our test device, which further limits the memory bandwidth. It would be better to install two modules.
Although the HP Pro Mini 400 G9 is very similar to the HP Elite Mini 800 G9, there are significant differences, which also affect the number of mass storage devices. Only two mass storage devices can be accommodated in the Pro Mini 400 G9, which should still be enough for most users. We see a much more important aspect in the selection of external interfaces. In terms of numbers, HP is clearly superior to the other competitors here too. Nevertheless, we criticize the lack of a Thunderbolt interface. It would also be easy for the system manufacturer to install an OCuLink connection. Unfortunately, HP does not offer this either. In relation to the sobering graphics performance, this would be a sensible approach to expand the device with an external graphics solution into a really good working device with a wide range of tasks.
HP charges 865 euros in its own store, which is significantly cheaper than an HP Elite Mini 800 G9, which does not perform significantly better. Regarding efficiency, the HP Pro Mini 400 G9 is the clear choice, even if it has a slightly lower CPU performance.
Note: We have recently updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. Further information can be found here available here.
Price and availability
The HP Pro Mini 400 G9 is available directly from the manufacturer. A price comparison is worthwhile, as various online stores offer the same device at significantly lower prices. The HP Pro Mini 400 G9 can be ordered via common retailers, Amazon for example.
HP Pro Mini 400 G9-936M3EA
-
06/24/2024 v8 (new)
Sebastian Bade
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.