Intel Arc A370M
The Intel Arc A370M is a dedicated mobile entry level graphics card for laptops based on Xe HPG microarchitecture. It uses the ACM-G11 chip and offers all 8 Xe-cores (128 ALUs), 8 ray tracing units and a 64-bit memory bus for 4 GB GDDR6 graphics memory. The chip integrates 7.2 billion transistors and the die measures 157 mm2.
The performance is in the entry level of dedicated graphics cards for laptops in 2022. AMD did publish some gaming benchmarks with medium settings in 5 games that showed that the Radeon RX 6500M is clearly faster. Intel only compared the A370M (with a faster CPU) to the slower Iris iGPU in the i7-1280P (see below). Thanks to the additional 2 cores and higher clock speeds, the entry level Arc A350M should be clearly left behind.
The chip also integrates two media engines for VP9, AVC, HEVC, and AV1 8k en- and decoding. The 4 display pipes support up to 4x 4k120 HDR via DMI 2.0B or DisplayPort 2.0 10G.
The A370M is produced in 6nm at TSMC (N6 process) and supports dynamic power share (using Deep Link) with 12th gen Intel CPUs (Alder Lake).
Arc Series Arc A770 4096 @ 2.1 - 2.4 GHz 256 Bit @ 16000 MHz Arc A750 3584 @ 2.05 - 2.4 GHz 256 Bit @ 16000 MHz Arc A580 3072 @ 1.7 - 2 GHz 256 Bit @ 16000 MHz A770M 512 @ 1.65 GHz 256 Bit @ 16000 MHz A730M 384 @ 1.1 GHz 192 Bit @ 14000 MHz A570M 16 @ 0.9 - 1.3 GHz 128 Bit @ 14000 MHz A550M 16 @ 0.9 - 2.01 GHz 128 Bit @ 14000 MHz A530M 12 @ 0.9 - 1.3 GHz 128 Bit @ 14000 MHz A370M 8 @ 1.55 GHz 64 Bit @ 14000 MHz Arc A380 1024 @ 2 GHz 96 Bit @ 15500 MHz A310 6 @ 2 GHz 64 Bit @ 15500 MHz A350M 6 @ 1.15 GHz 64 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Codename Alchemist Architecture Xe HPG Pipelines 8 - unified Raytracing Cores 8 Core Speed 1550 MHz Cache L1: 1.5 MB, L2: 4 MB Memory Speed 14000 MHz Memory Bus Width 64 Bit Memory Type GDDR6 Max. Amount of Memory 4 GB Shared Memory no Memory Bandwidth 112 GB/s API DirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.3 Power Consumption 50 Watt (35 - 50 Watt TGP) Transistor Count 7.2 Billion Die Size 157 mm² technology 6 nm PCIe 4 8x Displays 4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 2.0 10G Ready Date of Announcement 30.03.2022 Link to Manufacturer Page www.intel.com
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3505 avg: 4023 median: 4255 (12%) max: 4308 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 100% 99% 81%
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 3167 avg: 3650 median: 3885 (10%) max: 3899 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 100% 100% 81%
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 27250 avg: 28035 median: 28128 (30%) max: 28727 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 98% 100% 95%
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 33721 avg: 36141 median: 35604 (9%) max: 39098 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 86% 100% 91%
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 7699 avg: 7735 median: 7717 (14%) max: 7789 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 99% 100% 99%
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 8015 avg: 8157 median: 8149 (9%) max: 8307 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 96% 100% 98%
...
...
max:
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 12308 avg: 12563 median: 12520.5 (17%) max: 12902 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 100% 100% 97%
...
...
max:
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 11748 avg: 12066 median: 12089.5 (10%) max: 12338 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 98% 100% 95%
...
...
max:
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
60.4 fps (16%)
...
...
max:
specvp13 snx-03 + SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
2 fps (0%)
...
max:
specvp13 showcase-02 + SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
30.2 fps (7%)
...
...
max:
specvp13 medical-02 + SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
28 fps (6%)
...
...
max:
specvp13 maya-05 + SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
75.1 fps (9%)
...
...
max:
specvp13 energy-02 + SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
3.9 fps (1%)
...
...
specvp13 creo-02 + SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
61.1 fps (9%)
...
...
max:
specvp13 catia-05 + SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
85.8 fps (10%)
...
...
max:
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
62.7 fps (11%)
...
...
max:
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
20.9 fps (4%)
...
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
1.9 fps (0%)
...
max:
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
13.1 fps (9%)
...
max:
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
3.9 fps (3%)
...
max:
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
15.7 fps (10%)
...
max:
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
20.3 fps (9%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 125.4 avg: 148.3 median: 129.1 (8%) max: 190.4 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 100% 66% 68%
...
...
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 100% 100% 100%
...
...
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 57.7 avg: 68.1 median: 58.8 (8%) max: 87.7 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 100% 105% 105%
...
...
max:
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 Tooltip Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX: Ø57.7 (51.4-83.7)
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE: Ø58.8 (53.5-76)
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD: Ø87.7 (85.4-92.8)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 61.3 avg: 70.4 median: 65 (9%) max: 85 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 100% 103% 104%
...
...
max:
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Tooltip Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE: Ø61.3 (56.7-75.4)
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX: Ø65 (60.7-101.5)
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD: Ø85 (81.4-100.8)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 65 avg: 73.1 median: 68.8 (15%) max: 85.6 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 100% 105% 106%
...
...
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Tooltip Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE: Ø65 (60-77.7)
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX: Ø68.8 (63.6-91)
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD: Ø85.6 (82.7-107.3)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3014 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (38%) max: 0.3846 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 78% 99% 100%
...
...
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.3035 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (34%) max: 0.4078 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W 74% 99% 100%
...
...
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
45.2 dB(A) (72%)
...
...
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
...
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
...
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Tooltip
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
max:
max:
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
0 100 200 Tooltip Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX: Ø45.5 (30.596-228)
...
...
max:
0 Tooltip Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX: Ø35.7 (29.108-55.3)
...
...
max:
0 100 Tooltip Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX: Ø32.3 (23.227-164.9)
...
...
max:
0 Tooltip Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX: Ø23.9 (15.231-53.8)
...
...
max:
0 Tooltip Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX: Ø17.5 (10.684-78.2)
...
max:
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1920x1080
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1920x1080
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
0 100 Tooltip Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE: Ø86.6 (49-103)
...
...
max:
0 Tooltip Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE: Ø48.1 (43-58)
...
...
max:
0 Tooltip Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE: Ø44.6 (40-53)
...
...
max:
0 Tooltip Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE: Ø42.2 (39-50)
...
...
max:
0 Tooltip Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE: Ø28.1 (25-34)
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Tooltip Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX: Ø191.2 (159.04-1400)
...
...
max:
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Tooltip Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX: Ø113.6 (93.343-602)
...
...
max:
0 Tooltip Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX: Ø56.2 (46.206-87.4)
ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD: Ø54.5 (52-57)
...
...
max:
0 Tooltip Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE: Ø22.8 (21-26)
Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX: Ø26.3 (24-28)
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo 4 67.1 60.9 39.2 Star Wars Jedi Survivor 23 19.7 19.2 17.7 Resident Evil 4 Remake 45.7 26.3 11.6 3.52 Company of Heroes 3 55.7 47.8 37.2 37.1 Sons of the Forest 27.6 17.4 11.5 11.4 Atomic Heart 55.5 42.4 24 20.2 Returnal 27 26 22 10 Hogwarts Legacy 43.2 30.3 19.6 12.7 Dead Space Remake 22.6 17.8 12.1 8.86 High On Life 73.4 44.6 40.8 32.6 A Plague Tale Requiem 22.9 19.5 16.6 14.3 FIFA 23 70 62 40 41 30 F1 22 127.2 49.5 46.3 33 2.85 Vampire Bloodhunt 127 87 62 55 34 Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 46.1 37.1 25.4 21 GRID Legends 97 69 56 42 33 God of War 35 31 25 19 12 Guardians of the Galaxy 23 14 12 Far Cry 6 86 44 36 24 F1 2021 192 89 62 25 Hitman 3 85.7 54.9 50 46.2 23.4 Assassin´s Creed Valhalla 62 33 20 18 13 Dirt 5 80.4 40.7 32 23.1 15.2 Watch Dogs Legion 77 45 34 15 11 Horizon Zero Dawn 57 40 35 31 23 Gears Tactics 189 76.8 48.8 38.4 27.7 Borderlands 3 76.4 47.5 29.5 22 14.5 Metro Exodus 92.1 44.1 31.3 25.5 19.8 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 67 49 41 32 20 Strange Brigade 179 75 63 53 37.2 Far Cry 5 89 49 46 43 29 X-Plane 11.11 38 30 26 22.2 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 69 37 24 23 Middle-earth: Shadow of War 44 Dota 2 Reborn 95 82 68 64 39.5 The Witcher 3 152 95 51 26 GTA V 150 140 41 11 10 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 6 8 15 7 7 19 9 1 15 18 4 19 12 1 14 4 1 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 11. 03:02:04
#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s
#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 May 2024 05:38:50 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#3 composed specs +0.084s ... 0.086s
#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.086s
#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.086s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11306 +0.017s ... 0.102s
#7 got single benchmarks 11306 +0.026s ... 0.128s
#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.128s
#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.751s ... 0.88s
#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.88s
#11 Got 232 rows for game benchmarks. +0.07s ... 0.95s
#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.95s
#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.033s ... 0.983s
#14 benchmarks composed for output. +2.696s ... 3.679s
#15 return log +0.156s ... 3.835s
Benchmarks by AMD
Benchmarks by Intel
Notebook reviews with Intel Arc A370M graphics card
Acer Swift X 16 (2022) review: 16-inch laptop with powerful updates The Acer Swift X 16 (2022) is a light 16-inch laptop with additional graphics performance. The bright display finally comes in the 16:10 format and offers a hig...
Intel Core i7-1260P | Intel Arc A370M | 16.00" | 1.8 kg
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G in review: a laptop that balances efficiency and performance Thanks to the additional Intel Arc A370M graphics processor, Acer's notebook promises significantly better performance in image and video editing – even for gam...
Intel Core i5-1240P | Intel Arc A370M | 16.00" | 1.8 kg
Intel Arc A370M debut: Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD 2-in-1 review The Zenbook Flip 15 is back with 12th gen Intel Core H CPUs and the new Intel Arc A370M GPU to replace last year's Core U options and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q...
Intel Core i7-12700H | Intel Arc A370M | 15.60" | 1.8 kg
Dell XPS 15 9530, Intel Arc A370M : Intel Core i7-13700H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
External Review » Dell XPS 15 9530, Intel Arc A370M
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAH7, i5-12500H : Intel Core i5-12500H, 16.00", 2.2 kg
External Review » Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAH7, i5-12500H
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 Flip UP6502ZD, i7-12700H : Intel Core i7-12700H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
External Review » Asus ZenBook Pro 15 Flip UP6502ZD, i7-12700H
HP Spectre x360 16-f1180ng : Intel Core i7-1260P, 16.00", 2 kg
External Review » HP Spectre x360 16-f1180ng
Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX : Intel Core i7-1260P, 16.00", 1.8 kg
External Review » Acer Swift X SFX16-52G-77RX
»
Acer Swift X 16 (2022) tested: 16-inch laptop with many upgrades uses Intel Arc A370M
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD : Intel Core i7-12700H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
» Asus Zenbook Flip 15 Q539ZD OLED display is 40 percent dimmer than what the manufacturer is advertising
Please share our article, every link counts!
» Comparison of GPUs Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.
» Benchmark List Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.
» Notebook Gaming List Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.
Class 1
Class 2 Radeon PRO W6600M *
Class 3 UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
Class 4
Class 5 * Approximate position of the graphics adapter
Working For Notebookcheck
Are you a techie who knows how to translate? Then join our Team!
Details here
Top 10 Laptops Multimedia , Budget Multimedia , Gaming , Budget Gaming , Lightweight Gaming , Business , Budget Office , Workstation , Subnotebooks , Ultrabooks , Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros , under 500 USD/Euros , 1,000 USD/Euros , for University Students , Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones Smartphones , Phablets , ≤6-inch , Camera Smartphones
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2022-06-22)