ARM Mali-G68 MP5
The ARM Mali-G68 MP5 (or G68MC5) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). The MP5 version uses five of the six possible clusters / cores.
It was introduced early 2023 in the Samsung Exynos 1380 SoC . It is based on the Valhall architecture and is advertised by ARM as a "sub-premium GPU". It offers all features of the Mali-G78 series including improvements for battery runtime and machine learning.
Mali-G Series Codename Valhall Architecture Valhall Pipelines 5 - unified Shared Memory no technology 5 nm Date of Announcement 14.09.2021 Link to Manufacturer Page www.arm.com
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 6103 avg: 6217 median: 6224 (27%) max: 6317 Points
...
...
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 7030 avg: 7122 median: 7134 (16%) max: 7189 Points
...
...
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 4897 avg: 4978 median: 5002 (25%) max: 5043 Points
...
...
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5118 avg: 5208 median: 5233 (16%) max: 5323 Points
...
...
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 2796 avg: 2911 median: 2955 (1%) max: 2987 Points
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 796 avg: 1252 median: 825 (1%) max: 3001 Points
...
Qualcomm Adreno 720
...
max:
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.8 avg: 5.9 median: 5.9 (2%) max: 6 fps
...
...
max:
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 13 avg: 13.4 median: 13 (2%) max: 14 fps
...
...
max:
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 34 avg: 34.4 median: 34 (3%) max: 35 fps
...
...
max:
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 30 avg: 30.8 median: 31 (3%) max: 31 fps
...
...
max:
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 52 avg: 52.2 median: 52 (1%) max: 53 fps
...
...
max:
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 78 avg: 79 median: 79 (5%) max: 80 fps
...
...
max:
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 118 avg: 119 median: 119 (1%) max: 120 fps
...
...
max:
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 143857 avg: 147409 median: 148214 (18%) max: 149350 Points
...
...
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 41.45 avg: 41.7 median: 41.7 (0%) max: 41.92 fps
...
...
max:
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 2971 avg: 3046 median: 3069 (1%) max: 3098 points
...
...
max:
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 3039 avg: 3083 median: 3102 (1%) max: 3109 points
...
...
max:
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
12517 Points (13%)
...
...
max:
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
3997 Points (7%)
...
...
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.32 avg: 5.1 median: 5.2 (2%) max: 6.04 Watt
...
Qualcomm Adreno 720
...
max:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Tooltip Samsung Galaxy A54 5G: Ø4.32 (4.08-4.55)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G: Ø4.37 (3.89-5.98)
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 5G: Ø5.21 (3.38-6.23)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE: Ø5.4 (4.89-6.13)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus: Ø6.04 (5.7-7.45)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
0 Tooltip Galaxy A54 5G 1.8.0: Ø55.5 (39-61)
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
0 Tooltip Galaxy Tab Active5 5G 4.4.0_20481013_20559831: Ø49.6 (38-56)
Galaxy Tab S9 FE 4.2.1_18831865_18963989: Ø53.6 (27-61)
Galaxy A54 5G 3.6.0_13833164_13951843: Ø56.7 (31-61)
...
0 Tooltip Galaxy A54 5G 3.6.0_13833164_13951843: Ø43.1 (26-58)
Galaxy Tab S9 FE 4.2.1_18831865_18963989: Ø50.3 (24-60)
0 Tooltip Galaxy A54 5G 3.6.0_13833164_13951843: Ø36.5 (23-53)
Galaxy Tab Active5 5G 4.4.0_20481013_20559831: Ø38.1 (27-49)
Galaxy A35 5G 4.5.0_21307647_21321795: Ø39.7 (31-56)
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
0 Tooltip Galaxy A54 5G 2.5.0: Ø30 (29-31)
Galaxy Tab S9 FE 2.9.0: Ø30 (29-31)
Galaxy Tab Active5 5G 3.0.0: Ø29.4 (16-31)
...
...
0 Tooltip Galaxy A54 5G 2.5.0: Ø30 (29-31)
...
...
0 Tooltip Galaxy A54 5G 2.5.0: Ø30 (29-31)
Galaxy Tab S9 FE 2.9.0: Ø30 (29-31)
Galaxy Tab Active5 5G 3.0.0: Ø29.3 (21-31)
Galaxy A35 5G 3.1.0: Ø39.8 (32-41)
...
...
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
0 Tooltip Galaxy Tab S9 FE 4.3.3a: Ø59.7 (56-61)
...
...
0 Tooltip Galaxy Tab S9 FE 4.3.3a: Ø58.6 (48-62)
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 58.5 Genshin Impact 55 47 38 PUBG Mobile 30 30 32 Asphalt 9: Legends 60 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 1 2 1 1 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 10. 05:10:46
#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s
#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 May 2024 05:40:33 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#3 composed specs +0.051s ... 0.052s
#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.052s
#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.052s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11584 +0.014s ... 0.066s
#7 got single benchmarks 11584 +0.016s ... 0.081s
#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.081s
#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.304s ... 0.385s
#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.385s
#11 Got 19 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.393s
#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.393s
#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.395s
#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.083s ... 0.477s
#15 return log +0.043s ... 0.52s
Notebook reviews with ARM Mali-G68 MP5 graphics card
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G review - A powerful all-rounder with Galaxy S design for under $300 With the Galaxy A35, Samsung has put together a strong smartphone package. The newest mid-range model in the popular Galaxy A series scores points for a wide ra...
Samsung Exynos 1380 | ARM Mali-G68 MP5 | 6.60" | 209 g
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 5G tablet review – Handy, robust and with removable battery The Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 is a water- and dust-resistant tablet with physical buttons, cellular connectivity and a bundled S Pen. It is suitable for those ...
Samsung Exynos 1380 | ARM Mali-G68 MP5 | 8.00" | 433 g
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Tablet in review - The gap filler Samsung is introducing a fan edition of the Galaxy Tab S9, called the Galaxy Tab S9 FE. With this move, Samsung aims to bridge the gap between its flagship mode...
Samsung Exynos 1380 | ARM Mali-G68 MP5 | 10.90" | 524 g
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) in review - Waterproof XXL tablet with S Pen and a bright display The IP certification and extended upgrades make the Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus stand out among tablets in the upper mid-range segment. Large display and optional 5G ...
Samsung Exynos 1380 | ARM Mali-G68 MP5 | 12.40" | 627 g
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G review - A powerful, mid-range smartphone with many upgrades The Galaxy A54 5G is the poster child for Samsung's mid-range devices. Our review highlights upgrades over last year's model, especially the SoC, display bright...
Samsung Exynos 1380 | ARM Mali-G68 MP5 | 6.40" | 202 g
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 5G : Samsung Exynos 1380, 8.00", 0.4 kg
External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 5G
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G : Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.60", 0.2 kg
External Review » Samsung Galaxy A35
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE : Samsung Exynos 1380, 10.90", 0.5 kg
External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus : Samsung Exynos 1380, 12.40", 0.6 kg
External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Samsung Galaxy F54 5G : Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.70", 0.2 kg
External Review » Samsung Galaxy F54 5G
Samsung Galaxy M54 : Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.70", 0.2 kg
External Review » Samsung Galaxy M54
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G : Samsung Exynos 1380, 6.40", 0.2 kg
External Review » Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 5G : Samsung Exynos 1380, 8.00", 0.4 kg
» Samsung Galaxy Tab Active5 – Rugged tablet with many qualities
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE : Samsung Exynos 1380, 10.90", 0.5 kg
» Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Android tablet hits record-low on Amazon
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus : Samsung Exynos 1380, 12.40", 0.6 kg
» Review of the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+: The Samsung tablet fits into the Galaxy universe
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE : Samsung Exynos 1380, 10.90", 0.5 kg
» Review of the Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE - Samsung tightens the performance screw
Please share our article, every link counts!
» Comparison of GPUs Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.
» Benchmark List Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.
» Notebook Gaming List Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.
Class 3 UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
Adreno 720 *
Class 4
Class 5
Class 6 * Approximate position of the graphics adapter
Working For Notebookcheck
Are you a techie who knows how to translate? Then join our Team!
Details here
Top 10 Laptops Multimedia , Budget Multimedia , Gaming , Budget Gaming , Lightweight Gaming , Business , Budget Office , Workstation , Subnotebooks , Ultrabooks , Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros , under 500 USD/Euros , 1,000 USD/Euros , for University Students , Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones Smartphones , Phablets , ≤6-inch , Camera Smartphones
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-04-26)