AMD Radeon Pro 455
The AMD Radeon Pro 455 is mobile graphics card for laptops that can be found in the high-end model of the Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 Late 2016. It is based on the small Polaris 11 chip which is manufactured in 14 nm FinFET at Globalfoundries. Compared to the Radeon RX 460 (see for benchmarks) , the Pro 455 features only 768 instead of 896 shaders and definately lower clock speeds. The peak performance is rated at 1.3 TFLOPS and therefore 30% faster than the Pro 450, but clearly slower than the 1.86 TFLOPS of the Pro 460 and 2.2 TFLOPS of the RX460. The performance of the card could be similar to the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M as the RX 460 is similar to the GTX 965M . A major drawback is the small VRAM size of only 2 GB GDDR5. The optional Radeon Pro 460 offers 4 GB of VRAM, 1024 shaders and 1.86 TFLOPS and should be similar to the RX 460.
Apple and AMD don't provide driver updates for Windows using Bootcamp. The only option is to use modified drivers from BootcampDrivers.com .
The features of the Radeon Pro 455 are identical to the faster RX 460 and all other Polaris chips. See more details on the Polaris architecture here . According to AMD, the Pro 455 support DisplayPort 1.2 (altough 1.4 is supported by Polaris) and HDMI 2.0 (via USB-C adapter).
The power envelope of the faster Radeon Pro 460 is rated at 35 Watt according to the AMD blog post . Due to the slower specs, the Radeon Pro 455 should use slightly less.
Radeon RX 400M Series Codename Polaris 11 Architecture Polaris Pipelines 768 - unified Core Speed 855 MHz Memory Speed 5000 MHz Memory Bus Width 128 Bit Memory Type GDDR5 Max. Amount of Memory 2048 MB Shared Memory no API DirectX 12, OpenGL Vulkan Power Consumption <35 Watt Transistor Count 3 Billion technology 14 nm Features DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSync Notebook Size large Date of Announcement 27.10.2016 Link to Manufacturer Page creators.radeon.com
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
1254 Points (4%)
...
unknown
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1118 Points (3%)
...
unknown
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
229045 Points (26%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
15766 Points (17%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
23434 Points (6%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
3463 Points (6%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
3759 Points (4%)
...
...
max:
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
5774 Points (8%)
...
...
max:
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
5388 Points (5%)
...
...
max:
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
16522 Points (5%)
...
...
max:
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
14879 Points (8%)
...
...
max:
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
25873 Points (34%)
...
...
max:
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
16.4 fps (5%)
...
...
max:
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
47.4 fps (12%)
...
...
max:
specvp12 snx-02 + SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
13.9 fps (2%)
...
...
max:
specvp12 showcase-01 + SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
20.3 fps (4%)
...
...
max:
specvp12 mediacal-01 + SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
10.8 fps (3%)
...
...
max:
specvp12 maya-04 + SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
30.2 fps (8%)
...
...
max:
specvp12 energy-01 + SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
0.2 fps (0%)
...
...
max:
specvp12 creo-01 + SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
32.8 fps (13%)
...
...
max:
specvp12 catia-04 + SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
31.2 fps (5%)
...
...
max:
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
26.4 fps (5%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
12740 points (9%)
...
...
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
100 fps (6%)
...
...
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
...
...
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
92.2 fps (5%)
...
...
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
229 fps (2%)
...
...
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
483 Samples/s (2%)
...
...
max:
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
918 Samples/s (2%)
...
...
max:
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
3049 points (3%)
...
...
max:
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
56.1 Watt (8%)
...
...
max:
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
48.3 Watt (7%)
...
...
max:
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.3 fps per Watt (24%)
...
...
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
...
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
...
...
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
...
...
max:
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
...
...
...
...
...
max:
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
...
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
...
...
...
...
...
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
...
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1920x1080
...
...
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
...
...
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
...
...
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
...
...
max:
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
...
...
max:
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 09. 17:51:52
#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s
#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 May 2024 05:40:33 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#3 composed specs +0.065s ... 0.066s
#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.066s
#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.066s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 7592 +0.013s ... 0.079s
#7 got single benchmarks 7592 +0.008s ... 0.087s
#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.087s
#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.566s ... 0.653s
#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.653s
#11 Got 74 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.66s
#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.66s
#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.019s ... 0.679s
#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.614s ... 1.292s
#15 return log +0.037s ... 1.329s
Please share our article, every link counts!
» Comparison of GPUs Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.
» Benchmark List Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.
» Notebook Gaming List Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.
Class 1
Class 2 Radeon PRO W6600M *
Class 3 UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
Class 4
Class 5 * Approximate position of the graphics adapter
Working For Notebookcheck
Are you a techie who knows how to translate? Then join our Team!
Details here
Top 10 Laptops Multimedia , Budget Multimedia , Gaming , Budget Gaming , Lightweight Gaming , Business , Budget Office , Workstation , Subnotebooks , Ultrabooks , Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros , under 500 USD/Euros , 1,000 USD/Euros , for University Students , Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones Smartphones , Phablets , ≤6-inch , Camera Smartphones
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2017-02- 1)